It’s illegal to view crime in the UK

a reply to: Athetos

Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it…

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: Athetos

Prosecution of witnesses...that's what the monarchy did right before they went full tyranny.

Was also one of the reasons separatists left the European nation's and emigrated to the America's seeking individual liberty and escaped religious persecution;

Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We The People Do N O T Consent

You really have that all backwards. Certain religious groups had been persicuting the rest in Europe and those persicuted had decided they had had enough after 300 years. They were pushing for religious laws to be put in place. Slowly gaining political power by legislature. Persicuting of the persicuters if you will.

Fortunately, most of those that left mellowed out somewhat.

But if you're a pedophile or a rapist in the UK, they just let you go

Most of the judges sending people to jail for thought crimes have a record of letting pedos go.

Source

Which groups. Who exactly persecuted who and how.

If you don’t mind explaining yourself that is.

a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

For those in the UK, be sure to temper what you say here. I've read they're arresting people for posting online. I sometimes take the 1st for granted, but when I see behavior like that, I'm happy that it's there. Of course, the tacked-on "for now" is hanging in the air waiting to come down.

UK gov are clowns and the people there are enabling cowards

jail for viewing crime
jail for meme trolling
jail for the "wrong opinion" on social media

but they let pedos, murders and rapists free

frankly, i have zero sympathy for the UK people.. you get what you deserve

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: Athetos

My prayer for all of us. Today we need to focus on the UK and Ireland. Dear father in heaven, we ask you remove those from places of power over humanity who place pitfalls in our paths so they may abuse their power. Amen!

This is a culture war and they want us fighting others who are not from the religions we were born so they get to keep doing what they do.

Wherever you spend today, leave it better than you found it.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: charlest2

Absolutely not Charles. We have a Constitutional Monarchy. Since our Civil War the Monarch has been a figurehead and Parliament makes the laws etc.

Look to our new Labour PM.

Who gives the nod that prints the money?

a reply to: Athetos

I think the police would want bystanders filming events, so as to help catch the perpetrators.

originally posted by: Dalamax

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: charlest2

Absolutely not Charles. We have a Constitutional Monarchy. Since our Civil War the Monarch has been a figurehead and Parliament makes the laws etc.

Look to our new Labour PM.

Who gives the nod that prints the money?

The Bank of England and Parliament (the Chancellor) - the monarch isn't allowed any political opinion and is bound to carry out the will of Parliament in accordance with the Constitution.

For example Charles has always been a very vocal climate activist and speaks to plants but as soon as he became monarch the government banned him from attending any climate conferences.

a reply to: Dalamax

Bank of England and Parliament.

No nodding involved.

guillotine them and lets se if the country gets any worse?

It's a useful fiction that the monarch is ceremonial but there was plenty of evidence that the late Queen meddled with our laws immensely, and the then Prince Charles also, his bit was known as the Black Spider Memos

They exercise way more power over our elected officials than most people are comfortable admitting

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

He has no real power.

You have got to be kidding. 🙄

a reply to: 5thHead

No, I m not.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

No, the Fascist judge gives him self an out to excuse those observers he does approve off.

Refusing bail, Judge Rafferty said: “Anybody involving themselves in this type of behaviour, this type of disorder, be an active participant or a curious observer can expect to be, save for the most exceptional circumstances, remanded into custody, and this defendant is remanded into custody.”

a reply to: SprocketUK

From your source:

"Upon their release, the memos were variously described in the press as "underwhelming"[4] and "harmless",[5] and The Daily Telegraph claimed that their release had "backfired on those who seek to belittle him".[6][7]"

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SprocketUK

From your source:

"Upon their release, the memos were variously described in the press as "underwhelming"[4] and "harmless",[5] and The Daily Telegraph claimed that their release had "backfired on those who seek to belittle him".[6][7]"

Damage limitation.
These besuited quislings all know who they really have to keep happy to get their titles and it isnt whoever is in number ten until the next election.

You may like having a bunch of Normans lording it over us still, but I don't

a reply to: SprocketUK

Monarchs on odd occasions have let their opinions be known on certain subjects to Prime Minister's and have even very occasionally sought to influence government policy....with incredibly little success.
The ruling Monarch has no real power, which is as it should be.

As a bit of an aside; I know it won't happen, but I wonder what would happen if Charles came out in support of all those expressing concerns about unfettered immigration and its effects on British culture and society?

a reply to: SprocketUK

I thought Germans?

I'm all for thinning the Royals out, by the way.

a reply to: Freeborn
Myyyy..... wouldn't that be interesting IF he did! Maybe behind closed doors?
Rainbows
Jane