Graph of failing magnetic protection.

a reply to: annonentity

They should not be killing Bee's annonentity i agree on that score.

Luckily while Bees are among the most effective and well-known pollinators.

There are other insects that also contribute to pollination.

As to finishing off the insects, eradicating all insects is neither feasible nor desirable.

And there are estimated to be around 30 million species of insects on the planet.

More chance of eradicating humanity really than there is of completing that task.

a reply to: andy06shake

Chemtrails are no longer a conspiracy theory, a few States are banning them. But as far as we know it might not be the chem trails causing the die off, it might be a natural cycle.

a reply to: annonentity
Tennessee and some other states have chemtrail legislation, but that doesn't make it not a conspiracy theory.
All it will do is prevent geoengineering research from taking place in Tennessee but I doubt much of that happened before anyway. So after the bill passes, people will still look up and see the same amount of vapor trails they've always seen, and it's not because they are breaking some new anti-geoengineering law, it's because they've always been vapor trails in Tennessee.

Tennessee lawmakers vote to ban geoengineering, with allusions to 'chemtrails' conspiracy theory

Most geoengineering options are theoretical and untested. Federal researchers have taken only a few small steps toward studying their feasibility, and atmospheric scientists say there is no evidence of any large-scale programs.

On its face, Tennessee’s bill represents an attempt to prevent experimentation with or deployment of such technologies...

Justin Mankin, a climate scientist at Dartmouth College, said: “It’s conspiratorial nonsense. The challenge here is that the whole chemtrails conspiracy has blurred and subsumed all these distinct technologies with distinct aims, which makes it challenging to disentangle.”

It's still a conspiracy theory. Even if all 50 states pass such legislation, it's not going to reduce the number of vapor trails that people see and call "chemtrails" and the geoengineering they are banning was mostly theoretical.

I'm not against banning geoengineering if that's what they are really for, but if anybody is expecting to see less vapor trails aka "chemtrails" after this legislation is in place, they are going to be still freaking out about the same stupid conspiracy theory and nothing in the skies will have changed.

Indiana passed a bill setting the value of Pi as 3.2, but that law didn't affect the actual value of Pi, and chemtrail legislation won't have any effect on non-existent chemtrails or vapor trails, so laws being passed don't really prove anything, change the value of Pi, or make chemtrails "real".

a reply to: annonentity

Yes they are.

Else present proof that they are no longer a conspiracy theory.

The logistics involved for a start are completely unimplementable.

And the chemtrail conspiracy theory has been debunked by science.

Dont bother with guff from Bitchute/Rumble.

We wish real proof and not the ramblings of the mental health cases.