Graph of failing magnetic protection.

It is looking more certain that we are not dealing with a Mear magnetic excursion , but a magnetic field which is cycling toward a full flip. Which if the present graph indicating falling strength will occur within many peoples lifetimes. It is also looking likely that at the same time glaciation will also be occurring. This has to be affecting the general wellbeing of the planet as the present interglacial comes to an end. Some commentators are saying that they think the field strength is down as much as thirty seven percent as it appears to be falling at an exponential rate. Empires rise and fall on the mood of the Sun. But so does our health and wellbeing. We can all agree that these are difficult times, but the reality that they may have a primary driver cannot be ignored. Here is an update from Suspicious observer, suffice to say that the latest magnetic pole position from "Mavstar" is that it is speeding up and is well past his forty five degree flip theory mark. I wonder if the extensive DUMBS are more in preparation for the expected climate gyrations as they are for war?
It might be worth mentioning that home gardeners in the UK and Ireland are finding it very difficult to get a crop in this year.

Ben Davidson can lean towards being a dramatic fearmonger sometimes

He may be up to date on the known science, but he doesn't really understand toroidal equilibrium, or what this world actually is

The poles do not "reverse" in the way he believes they do

Every planet orbiting the sun, sits at an exact distance, which is equal to layers in the suns magnetic fields

There is a flux within the orbits, that acts like a pulse. With every planet keeping exact distance and measurements, based on vector equilibrium within the solar torus

All the planets are connected together, by a wave-form like stream, that runs through every one of them. Which gives each their own microcosm torus of polarity and magnetic influence

In the middle of the orbital plates of the solar torus, there is already a "return", which was often called things like "planetary crossing" in the ancient times

A point where the forces being put outwards within the solar torus, by the nuclear sun, meet with a return balance from the external edge of the orbital plate "shell", which pushes "inwards", out of necessity for the torus drinking in from the (Northern) source, of the oculus countenance, to the formation of the solar nucleus

The stream that created and sustains the sun, and all life within our system pours in from the North, and flows through to the south

Think of it like light pouring in through the pupil, to be focused into a point in the dead centre of the eyeball

That focus point in the middle is the sun

The pupil, that the light pours through, we refer to as a "black hole"

Though it is often referred to as "the all-seeing eye"

The reversal point within our solar system is Saturn. Which is, essentially, an inside-out version of Earth

Outside of this, you find seemingly "sideways" layers, of Neptune and Uranus, which stabilise layering within the Earth we know as the oceans (Neptune) and the atmosphere (Uranus)

My point is, there is phase wave which runs inwards and outwards from the sun, to the reversal point and extreme shell edge of the solar torus, which speeds up and slows down, which is mostly imperceptible to us within the waves

Think of it being like waves in a river, rising and falling, whilst flotsam on the surface does not move

This phase, pulls the magnetic spheres (microcosm torus) inwards and outwards towards the planets on either side

It is a pulse. Essentially

Within this pulse, our slipstream accelerates and compresses, at the waveform closes around the planet

Think of it like veins expanding and contracting, to push blood flow through tissue

Venus = Veins
Mars = Muscle

I am not being figurative or metaphorical when I tell you that Venus represents veins in a physical body, and Mars represents muscle

This is very literally what they are, and very literally why the planets are the colour they are and the way they are ... And why they are named what they are

Within the collapsing of the "pulse", it appears like the poles reverse. But this is not possible

We would very literally need to be knocked out of orbit of the sun for this to happen

Something does happen, where the magnetic sphere collapses in towards the magnetic centre, but this happens so a wave passes "over the top" of the poles, through the centre, to come back out the other side

The poles themselves never actually flip

They just contract, to allow a narrowing of a slipstream with the phase dynamics

The chaos and disasters we see, are no different to the massive influx of potential within blood being circulated within the body

A type of destructive cleansing

Nothing to fear

Though, it does not mean we should not try be more mindful and respectful of our planet

a reply to: annonentity

Having said all this ...

If you want to know the exact timing for the "pulse" of the planet, relative to the destruction and chaos?

A negative pressure dip "pulse" took place evening of December 24th, 1974
Cyclone Tracy, Darwin Australia

A positive pressure spike "pulse" took place the morning of December 26th, 2004
The Boxing Day Tsunami

These 2 incidents took part exactly 30 years apart. Originating from the exact same spot in the ocean

Right above Australia, because Australia is (essentially) the heart/nucleus of the world

Two small opposing spikes, that represent the start of a pulse, like a heartbeat

Meaning?

It would be a good idea, to be anywhere but Darwin, Australia, or anywhere along the south coasts of Asia, Christmas 2034

It should be pretty much EXACTLY Christmas Day, 2034 (between the other two dates, 24th and 26th)

Both the previous events are likely to be tiny, compared to whatever happens in 2034

There should also be another event, 2064. Also originating in the same spot

There is also a likelihood that the events may take place on the "outflow" side of the heart/Australia

If so, it would be very bad news for places around the Bermuda triangle, like Florida

a reply to: annonentity

The Earth's magnetic field is caused by the rotational currents within the solid core of iron and nickel that forms the core of the Earth. For the magnetic poles to 'flip' would require enormous forces, of which there aren't any evident, to move the core of the Earth out of place with respect to the crust.

a reply to: annonentity

It might be worth mentioning that home gardeners in the UK and Ireland are finding it very difficult to get a crop in this year.

Are they?

Im in Scotland and while it's not been the best of summers thus far(lots of rain).

My peas, carrots, potatoes, tomatoes, blackberries and raspberries are doing just fine and already producing fruit and vegetables.

a reply to: Compendium

Every planet orbiting the sun, sits at an exact distance, which is equal to layers in the suns magnetic fields

There is a flux within the orbits, that acts like a pulse. With every planet keeping exact distance and measurements, based on vector equilibrium within the solar torus

My understanding being planetary distances from the star are primarily governed by gravity not by the layers of the Suns magnetic field.

a reply to: andy06shake

Gravity is the effect of mass within an orbital position. Not the cause of its positioning

It does maintain the position though, relative to the other planets

But if we were not orbiting the sun, there would be no gravity. Or at least, not as we know it. If a sunless mass is moving, it has a centre of mass, equivalent to gravity. But it is not evenly distributed and constant like an orbiting mass. It fluctuates directionally, relative to the speed and arc of the mass, and the transiting invariant

If one of the suns orbiting bodies (or planets) was to fall out of orbit, the orbit of every other planet would change

As to then, would their mass, atmospheres, and every part of their composition, such as electric/chemical

The planets are not just aligned in the same solar orbit, they are very literally mechanics of the same organism

The chemicals we put into the atmosphere, affect Jupiter
The rubbish we put into the sea, affects Neptune

The waters of Neptune are very literally the oceans of Earth

Think of it like putting white light through a prism, so it breaks down into individual colours

Those colours are the planets

They are all connected, as layers, which combine to make the world we live in and perceive, within "the eye'

If a large asteroid wiped out Mars or Venus, all life on Earth would cease

As Venus is the veins of the solar body, destroying it would be like severing arteries and bleeding out

As Mars is the muscles/flesh of the body, destroying it would be like massive bodily trauma

Saturn, is Skeleton. The inside out, equivalent of the blood (water)

You get the idea

a reply to: Compendium

A lot of that sounds metaphorical rather than literal if I'm honest.

But the chemicals we put into the atmosphere do not affect Jupiter.

And the rubbish we put into the sea does not affect Neptune.

Or if you could explain how so from a scientific standpoint that might be nice?

Also the destruction of Mars/Venus by a large asteroid would not directly cause all life on Earth to cease.

It may have some gravitational effects on the solar system but it would not end life on Earth or even cause a significant change in Earth's orbit.

Ether way Compendium planetary distances from the star are governed by gravity and not the sun's magnetic field.

The again ... I could be completely wrong on everything

Who is to say what is certain in this world?

All we ever really have is the "most probable" understanding

👍😁

a reply to: andy06shake

You are looking at things linearly, not cyclically

The suns magnetic field, dictates gravity

Without its central pull to orbit, we would have no regulated rotation, and hence no gravity

And I assure you, those things do affect the other planets

There are mechanics of exchange between the planets, as they exist within a torus, with the sun at its centre

The solar system is a torus. Not a flat plate. The plate is just a disk centralised within the donut

EVERYTHING is connected

Everything we do, effects the other planets and vice versa

That's why what they refer to as "global warming" is happening on all planets not just Earth

Regardless of what you believe the cause is, it is uniform across all the planets, because they are connected

This is ancient knowledge, which has been suppressed

Mystery orders are not only given this information, but go through dimensional processes to experience it, so they can properly visualise and understand it

But the truth is you are living inside a giant body. Where the mind and manifest universe is a massive "all seeing" eye

We go beyond this physical world to learn these things

It is up up you if you believe it or not

The reason we have no problems with telling people, is that most cannot conceive such a thing, let alone believe it

a reply to: Compendium

The again ... I could be completely wrong on everything

Not everything.

Who is to say what is certain in this world?

Not who, but what.

Science relies on empirical evidence, and experimentation with reproducible results yet remains open to new findings.

Science is our best bet and the only tool we have in the bag that will allow us to understand the universe.

All we ever really have is the "most probable" understanding

That's true to a certain degree down to the fact that our personal beliefs and interpretations of the world are shaped by available information and experience.

a reply to: Compendium

You do realise that gravity itself is a fundamental force distinct from magnetic fields?

Our stars magnetic field and gravity are separate phenomena.

Gravity is determined by mass and described by gravity-related theories.

While magnetic fields affect charged particles and are described by electromagnetism.

a reply to: andy06shake

No it isn't

It is the phase differential between polarised magnetism

Within the Earth, the phase mechanism is density of mass. Gas, to liquid, to solid

We just do not properly understand it in this world yet

I can give you detailed rundown if you like

Also, I edited my last comment. To include more, after you replied. If you want to refresh and read it

a reply to: Compendium

Yes it is.

And again in mainstream physics, gravity and magnetic fields are treated as distinct forces, with their own governing principles.

Yes provide a detailed rundown that might be nice.

As to the edit, just opinion and not facts I'm afraid.

a reply to: andy06shake

It still remains that the solar system is a big clock, and when the time is midnight, the clanger goes off.

a reply to: annonentity

It still remains that the solar system is a big clock

I actually like that metaphor.

As it certainly illustrates the regularity and predictability of celestial mechanics.

Falls short in some other areas through.

Because while our solar system exhibits regularity, it is more complex than a simple clock with the dynamics being governed by gravitational forces, as opposed to mere mechanical gears and springs.

Also the star system is not a static system like a clock and over long timescales undergoes changes.

a reply to: andy06shake

When exceeding invariant potential permeates planetary atmosphere, the resistance it meets is a flux differential of equilibration, between its centrally-distributed nuclear impression ‘point of mass’, and the radiom expression of its ocular countenance.

‘Oculus’ is the overlooked but equally important partner and opposite of ‘Nucleus’. A consideration within all forms of nuclear physics that should be considered as vital as the nucle- itself.

The central nucleus and its surrounding oculus are a hyper-divergent binary stasis. The internalised to externalised duality of the pairs exception is not psiotic in its true form, by rather polyanthrophonic.

*Psiotic: Form of self, without influence.
*Polyanthrophonic: Many bodies of influence.

It needs to be understood (or at least visualised) that what we physically perceive as “internalisation” is not simply the countenance of a externalised parity, but actually is the externalised parity also.

BODY
A persons physical body is invariant expression which chemically seats a focus point of bioelectric recurrence. The result of perpetually promoted microcosmic off-set states. A calculated impression of that which is given by the layers of the world not only above and around it, but below and within it also.

BODIES
Whether it be tiny cells or a massive sun, all nuclear bodies work in much the same way. And all are formed in much the same way.

Exceeding surge paid inwards to a focus point causes hyper-interpolated transitioning within the concentration. This promotes exponential precipitation of cellular complexity, which in-turn translates into density as it is relayed into subsequent sub-layers. Inwardly filling the construct of the bodies focus point layer-by-layer.

Within a planetary perspective, we sit upon the edge of the Earths inward processes. This relegates our bodies precept subject to the forward propensity of angular momentum, towards the centrum point of density equalisation. Which is binary to its relative expartum dissipate equalisation.

The equilibration of the exceeding integration of angular motion potential over and into a torus, causes a centrally-distributed focal constriction within the parent equilibria, in which its microcosm promotion must be met with a equated dissonant distortion, which is relative and contrary to the constrictions propensity.

The exception of this pro- and con- relationship balances with itself, relative to vector equilibrium within the torus.

The prose force and its counter-force dysplasia promote a stabilisation dissident between them referred to as GRAVITY.

Within this dissident a point of biological stability is presented, where (energise) emanate potential is conducive in form and state to molecular aggregate.

Within all ‘nuclear’ microcosm torus, the proportions of the presented exceeding force permeate are at least equal to its countenance, as is essential to form and maintain a microcosmic stasis.

Besides gravity, the phase relationship between the hyper-commute of the ‘excelsior’ which exceeds of force/resistance, and the draught consumption of the ‘excalibur’ which inwardly recedes from force/resistance, creates a secondary polarisation which is moderate of the 'faster' accession of the parent macrocosm equilibria causing gravity and the 'slower' incision of the microcosm parabola.

This polarisation second of gravity, is referred to as MAGNETISM.

Magnetism is the expansive contraction of hyper-distillate sanctioning between two equilibria.

The comparative distress exchange of relative coalescence.

The recessive funnelling committed to its relative transitory phase, illustrates a recurrence of itself, within itself. Centring it and evenly distributing it’s ‘distress’ out to opposite sides of its form. The result is POLARISED MAGNETISM.

The directional distribution of this polarisation is relative and subject to the forward propensity of the macrocosm hyper-commute. Our minds physical perspective seated within the layering of both these fields of momentum, affords us the precept referred to as TIME.

The atmospheres exceeding permeate conveyance transmitted through, or super-exposed to the resistance of biological seatings within the same polarisation, are responsible for what is referred to as AGING.

The comparative isometric oppression within the biological seatings which resist and counter the conveyance of age-inducing permeate, find centre, and draw upon biological induction to rejuvenation the bodies construct and counter the decay effect caused by aging. This is what is referred to as GROWTH.

GROWTH < / > AGING

The divergence of this relationship relative to time, cannot be quantified beyond the designated cyclic indication markers we use to measure it, because its sync prevails the common perceptive congruence of the imperative by which it could be distinguished.

Meaning that time is promoted to us in such a way that it can only be ascertained as a comparative of itself within the given perspective we share with it. This allows us the deduction of its reception, exception and transitory comparative, but not its preeminent gestures.

Any physical baring upon, or within which extrapolation of such preeminent gestures could be correlated, sits well beyond the realms of physically manifested biological seatings, as well as all relative pre-, super,- and hyper-effigian realms.

It also sits well beyond any possible situational positioning of the biologically seated, and any other form-essences who may be seated 'relative' to the manifested effigian realm.

Basically, If we were to be, in such a way as to be able to perceive the 'dimensions' of time, then through the relatable precept, its function would cease.

a reply to: andy06shake

As far as I'm aware our understanding of gravity is at best incomplete. If quantum mechanics holds any ground it looks like we're actually quite wrong about gravity.

a reply to: Compendium

Well, i would need time to break that down buddy and assimilate properly.

But at a quick glance, a lot of what you're suggesting is more philosophical rather than scientific-based or proven via physics.

Also some pseudoscientific principles in there also if I'm not mistaken.

Again through, gravity and magnetic fields are distinct forces, with their own governing principles.

Ile get back to you if that's ok, summer holidays, and I'm on the way to swimming with the sprogs in tow. LoL

a reply to: Terpene

I think its a safe bet that a more complete theory incorporating quantum mechanics is required.

Especially so where a full understanding of gravitational interactions at the smallest scales is concerned.

That would be the holy grail really, or thereabouts, speaking from a physical and mathematical perspective and would go rather far as to formulating "theory of everything".

But at the macro scale, at which we exist, gravity as described by general relativity is very successful Terpene.

Again though I'm off swimming just now, so i cannot really answer accordingly.