It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Continued at: theconservativetreehouse.com... waukee-beloit-and-no-one-notices/
Once you see the strings on the marionettes you can never watch the performance, and not see them. The same thing happens when you know the details of how ballots are different than votes, and how the ballots are manipulated.
U.S. elections are no longer about âvotes,â modern elections in America are about âballotsâ. As we have seen in several election cycles, the election winner is not the person who gets the most votes â the election winner is the person who collects, submits and ultimately counts the most ballots. The same is true for the presidential electoral victory; itâs the person who gets the most ballots, not votes.
So, let us start by asking the right question: What is a representative from South Carolina doing in Wisconsin visiting ten key ballot counting precincts in three key cities, Madison, Milwaukee and Beloit? Anyone? Anyone? The story gets even more interesting when you see what text messages about âballot orderingâ followed James Clyburnâs visit!
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: WeMustCare
Every swing state voting station needs 24 hour surveillance to start a week before and go on until a week after the election.
We all know the Demwits are going to try something.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: WeMustCare
Every swing state voting station needs 24 hour surveillance to start a week before and go on until a week after the election.
We all know the Demwits are going to try something.
As the article states, and as we saw on election night 2020, the fraud happens at the BALLOT COUNTING point of elections.
Remember late Tuesday night on Nov 3, 2020 (about 2:00am Central) how a white van pulled up to a Wisconsin ballot counting station and unloaded 10 to 15 boxes of ballots?
Everyone felt there was something fishy going on, but no Republican officials in the state had the nerve to go look at the ballots. And the (Democrat) governor wouldn't allow a forensic audit of the ballots to see if they were cast by real Wisconsin adults.
President Trump quickly filed a suit. The corrupt liberal Wisconsin judge overseeing that district told the Trump legal team they should have filed their complaints with the court before the election occurred! (Another scum judge whose name is in the retribution book.)
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: WeMustCare
This should tell you how bad Kallama is. If she was ANY good, they would have replaced Biden months ago!
God I hope not.
originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
Serious question, is this how the next civil war starts? Weâve already seen the consequences of questioning the last election.
Right on time, in line with an economic collapse?
originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: Degradation33
There was cheating in 2016, with the ballots. Problem was the cheating wasn't enough
Trump won by MANY more votes in WI in 2016, but audit was called off after realizing HRC had a lot fewer votes than originally figured. Souce: I was on the audit team.
They knew they needed to up the cheat in WI, to be able to make up for Trump's popularity.
The Dems cheated in 2016 and 2020 and will do it this year.
originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: WeMustCare
I think ConservativeTreehouse is rotting people's mind with crap like this.
He lost 2020 by 20,000 votes (0.63%) and on won it in 2016 by 23,000 votes. (0.77%) A 43,000 vote shift. Currently they are the tightest of the swing states and if the election was held today Trump carries the state by 0.5% or about 15,000-16,000 votes.
I feel it's irresponsible of some conservative publications to omit that fact in favor of perpetuating a self-destructive narrative.
It's fine when Trump wins by a tiny percentage, but a steal when he loses? I feel they are using a guaranteed win/win situation in Wisconsin to rile people up regardless of outcome. It's like predicting the 405 will be crowed at 3PM.
It bugs me because it uses false causal connection to make people WANT to insurrect. And while I think it is a necessary balance to Huff Post pandering, I don't like when the lays the groundwork to set people off if Wisconsin does unexpected Wisconsin things again.... like vote for Dukakis
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: WeMustCare
Every swing state voting station needs 24 hour surveillance to start a week before and go on until a week after the election.
We all know the Demwits are going to try something.
Where voting rights were restricted in 2023 (so far)
Driven by many Republicansâ false belief that lax voting laws allowed the 2020 election to be stolen from former President Donald Trump, 2021 was a record-breaking year for voting restrictions. According to data from the Voting Rights Lab, a pro-voting-rights organization that tracks election-law legislation, state legislators introduced 566 bills restricting voter access or election administration that year, 53 of which were enacted. This year hasnât been quite so busy, but as of July 21, 366 laws with voting restrictions had been proposed and 29 had been enacted.
All but one of those 29 new laws1 came in states where Republicans have full control of the lawmaking process: Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana,2 Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming. Five of the laws include provisions that tighten voter-ID requirements, 11 include provisions that interfere with election administration and 13 have at least one provision that targets mail voting.Where voting rights were expanded in 2023 (so far)
Unlike two years ago, though, weâd argue that the bigger story of this yearâs legislative sessions was all the ways states made it easier to vote. As of July 21, according to the Voting Rights Lab, 834 bills had been introduced so far this year expanding voting rights, and 64 had been enacted. Whatâs more, these laws are passing in states of all hues. Democratic-controlled jurisdictions (Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island and Washington) enacted 33 of these new laws containing voting-rights expansions, but Republican-controlled states (Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming) were responsible for 23 of them. The remaining eight became law in states where the two parties share power (Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia).
That said, not all election laws are created equal, and the most comprehensive expansive laws passed in blue states