It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: EndTime
At this point in time, NOTHING Trump is accused of makes any difference to me. To many false claims, by 1,000 experts, crying wolf. The globalists blew it. I no longer pay any attention nor do I care what they accuse the man of.
I will still vote for him.
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: Boogerpicker
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: EndTime
do you have 51 former intel officers signatures to verify this?
"Trump’s attorney sent ProPublica a cease-and-desist letter demanding this article not be published. It warned that if the outlet and its reporters 'continue their reckless campaign of defamation, President Trump will evaluate all legal remedies,'" stated the post.
sounds like this will be sorted out in court, and could get expensive.
No. What is interesting is that it is not a denial lol.
I dunno, a lawsuit sounds like a denial to me. Ever sued someone because they're right?
A cease and desist is an order to stop doing something. Not a denial.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: EndTime
Nine witnesses in the criminal cases against former President Donald Trump have received significant financial benefits, including large raises from his campaign, severance packages, new jobs, and a grant of shares and cash from Trump’s media company.
The benefits have flowed from Trump’s businesses and campaign committees, according to a ProPublica analysis of public disclosures, court records and securities filings. One campaign aide had his average monthly pay double, from $26,000 to $53,500. Another employee got a $2 million severance package barring him from voluntarily cooperating with law enforcement. And one of the campaign’s top officials had her daughter hired onto the campaign staff, where she is now the fourth-highest-paid employee.
LINK
The article goes into detail on what each witness received to potentially modify or influence their participation in the cases against Trump.
Trump has already commented publicly that he will sue the publisher of the article, ProPublica.
Trump threatens to sue reporters who revealed that he's paying witnesses
Former President Donald Trump's legal team is threatening litigation against the nonprofit investigative outlet ProPublica, for a story published at the start of this month alleging his business and campaign are paying "significant financial benefits" to witnesses in cases against him.
ProPublica revealed the threat against them in a post on X Wednesday.
"Trump’s attorney sent ProPublica a cease-and-desist letter demanding this article not be published. It warned that if the outlet and its reporters 'continue their reckless campaign of defamation, President Trump will evaluate all legal remedies,'" stated the post.
LINK
A topic of discussion for tonight's debate?
Right here is the problem.
There's a certain segment of society that doesn't know what f'n evidence is....
People get paid and get raises all the time, but you haven't connected that to paying them to alter their testimony.
If you want to see how to do it right, watch the Young Thug trial..
Yup, it should be proven for Trump's attempt to enforce a cease and desist order.
While I agree with your comment regarding compensation not necessarily inferring a quid pro quo, it is apparent that you have not been in senior levels of management and had to deal with many anti-corruption policy meetings that are required for most corporations, as that really restricts certain "attempts" to game the system internally and externally.
Yes, those meetings are taken VERY seriously too, as CYA is very important.
Or do you mean strategy meetings?
At this point, if Trump openly cheated his way to POTUS this time, I'd be laughing my f'n ass off.
Game on..
originally posted by: stosh64
At this point in time, NOTHING Trump is accused of makes any difference to me. To many false claims, by 1,000 experts, crying wolf. The globalists blew it. I no longer pay any attention nor do I care what they accuse the man of.
I will still vote for him.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
Or do you mean strategy meetings?
At this point, if Trump openly cheated his way to POTUS this time, I'd be laughing my f'n ass off.
Game on..
originally posted by: Boogerpicker
a reply to: Boomer1947
Okay, Ive been straight up lied to about the evils of Trump more times than I can count, but I guess I'll believe it this time lol. That thought ever go through your head?
originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: DAVID64
Eight years ago the left couldn't stop clutching their pearls over the hyperbolic Trump quote:
“I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters”
Thanks to their ongoing antics they've actually made that quote true.
Something about "made your bed, now lie in it"...
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: EndTime
At this point in time, NOTHING Trump is accused of makes any difference to me. To many false claims, by 1,000 experts, crying wolf. The globalists blew it. I no longer pay any attention nor do I care what they accuse the man of.
I will still vote for him.
A serious question, with this approach do you worry that you might miss important matters that actually mean something to you if you willy choose to ignore information, whether it be about trump or not, and whether it is factual or not.
I dont like to be ignorant, I want to be aware of all information, fact based or fictional, to help me make important decisions. You do you i guess.
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: EndTime
At this point in time, NOTHING Trump is accused of makes any difference to me. To many false claims, by 1,000 experts, crying wolf. The globalists blew it. I no longer pay any attention nor do I care what they accuse the man of.
I will still vote for him.
A serious question, with this approach do you worry that you might miss important matters that actually mean something to you if you willy choose to ignore information, whether it be about trump or not, and whether it is factual or not.
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
I’m still voting for the guy that could serve a sentence vs the potato head that can’t put one together.