It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: CarlLaFong
Trump wanted us out. He made the plan. Biden just followed it.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: CarlLaFong
Again. To do that job. We'd have to send in troops. Do you really want a another forever war? More dead soldiers? Wasting billions of dollars?
Afghanistan Crapped the bed. It was their country to defend. They screwed it. If Trump was president the outcome would of been the same. Trump wanted us out. He made the plan. Biden just followed it.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: CarlLaFong
You can blame Biden all you want. But the truth is that Afghans failed to defend their country. They did not hold up their end of the bargain to defend it. The Taliban didn't honor their end either. And the Taliban took over. Also the Air force transported more than 124K people out of there in a week. It's sad that they couldn't take everyone. But they did what they could.
So again. Did you want to commit more troops to defend an airbase? Spend billions of dollars more? Sacrifice troops lives to defend an airbase? Military equipment etc?
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
Because it LOOKS like we're at war with Yemen.
US Navy faces its most intense combat since World War II against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels
The U.S.-led campaign against Iran-backed Houthi rebels has turned into the most intense running sea battle the Navy has faced since World War II.
The combat pits the Navy’s mission to keep international waterways open against a group whose former arsenal of assault rifles and pickup trucks has grown into a seemingly inexhaustible supply of drones, missiles, and other weaponry.
Near-daily attacks by the Houthis since November have seen more than 50 vessels clearly targeted, while shipping volume has dropped in the vital Red Sea corridor that leads to the Suez Canal and into the Mediterranean.
The Houthis say the attacks are aimed at stopping the war in Gaza and supporting the Palestinians, though it comes as they try to strengthen their position in Yemen. All signs suggest the warfare will intensify — putting U.S. sailors, their allies, and commercial vessels at more risk.
abcnews.go.com...
They're shooting missiles and launching drones at us...and we're shooting back at them.
Sure sounds like a war to me.
The Houthi’s have been a terrorist organization since the mid 90’s and have been in all kinds of internal Arab conflicts that had little to nothing to do with the US. Their actions are not necessarily being initially instigated by the US. They’re just bad people period, funded and supported by Iran who we keep shipping billions of taxpayer dollars to.
originally posted by: YouSir
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
Because it LOOKS like we're at war with Yemen.
US Navy faces its most intense combat since World War II against Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels
The U.S.-led campaign against Iran-backed Houthi rebels has turned into the most intense running sea battle the Navy has faced since World War II.
The combat pits the Navy’s mission to keep international waterways open against a group whose former arsenal of assault rifles and pickup trucks has grown into a seemingly inexhaustible supply of drones, missiles, and other weaponry.
Near-daily attacks by the Houthis since November have seen more than 50 vessels clearly targeted, while shipping volume has dropped in the vital Red Sea corridor that leads to the Suez Canal and into the Mediterranean.
The Houthis say the attacks are aimed at stopping the war in Gaza and supporting the Palestinians, though it comes as they try to strengthen their position in Yemen. All signs suggest the warfare will intensify — putting U.S. sailors, their allies, and commercial vessels at more risk.
abcnews.go.com...
They're shooting missiles and launching drones at us...and we're shooting back at them.
Sure sounds like a war to me.
Ummm...well...in the Houthi's defense...they didn't shoot anything at the navy...until the navy started to bomb them first...they limited their attacks to Israeli owned and bound merchant vessels initially...
Then the grande coalition showed up and began bombing the Houthi's...
The Houthi's just sank another merchant vessel bound for Israel with another one taking on water and in the process of sinking...just today...
Perhaps the US shouldn't be in the business of instigating all these conflicts around the world...
Nah...who am I trying to kid...it's the MO of the US to do just that...regardless which side of the Uniparty coin is on top at any given moment...
YouSir
God is the Greatest, Death to America, Death to Israel, A Curse Upon the Jews, Victory to Islam
Why can't you address these points. It's like you are being paid to post negatively about Biden. Who's paying you to ignore what I'm saying?
Ummm the deal Trump made was with the Taliban not the Afghan military and I remember hearing that part of that deal was for the US to maintain control of the city, whether that was 100% true IDK, but I did hear or read that. The city was not secured under Biden for any of the evacuation.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Again. That was only possible if the if the Afghan military was in control. And after the loss of control the only way to reestablish control was to send in more troops. Spending billions of dollars to get control back. And possibly having to be there for another decade. Losing more American lives.
[SNIP]
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Why can't you address these points. [SNIP]
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: CarlLaFong
So aside from talking points,
Have we held back any aid or military support?
White House Rips Up Meeting Plans With Israeli Officials After Getting Attacked for Withholding Weapons
A reportedly angry White House canceled a high-level intelligence meeting with Israeli officials after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attacked the Biden administration for withholding military aid.
Netanyahu said in a statement on Tuesday that it was “inconceivable” that the Biden administration was stonewalling military aid shipments to Israel, given Israeli forces’ ongoing war efforts against Hamas in Gaza.
Netanyahu claimed Tuesday that “for the past few months, the administration has been withholding weapons and ammunitions to Israel.” It was previously confirmed in May by Biden administration officials that one high payload munitions package was being put on hold over fears that it could be used in Gaza and have disproportionate effects on the civilian population.
Blinken Confirms US Is ‘Holding Back’ Military Aid To Israel After NBC Host Presses On Biden’s ‘Red Line’
Secretary of State Antony Blinken confirmed Sunday on NBC the U.S. is “holding back” specific military aid to Israel after being pressed on President Joe Biden’s “red line” as the Israel-Hamas conflict continues.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: CarlLaFong
That’s fair.
There is one shipment of 2,000lb bombs that was put on hold. Not cancelled.