It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Marxism To Destroy Patriotism, Family Unit, Christianity; Patriotic Americans Must Save USofA

page: 1
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 06:45 PM
link   
This article is a long ish read, so will share a portion below;


For 75 Years Cultural Marxism Worked to Destroy American Patriotism, The Family Unit, And Christianity; What Patriotic Americans Must Do to Save The Republic



By Capt Joseph R. John, June 10, 2024, Op Ed # 670



This below listed critically important essay about “Cultural Marxism” by William S. Lind was forwarded to us by LTG Thomas McInerny USMA ’59, USAF (Ret) who passed it on.

Every American Patriot should read the below history about how “Cultural Marxism” has been working to destroy America’s Patriotic Culture and the US Constitutional Republic for over 75 years.



Marxist’s Critical Theory became Critical Race Theory to be used to attack and vilify all white people in the United States. The attacks on the Family Unit and Christianity were part of the plan to destroy the peaceful and wholesome culture of the US Constitutional Republic.



The agent selected to be in charge of changing the US Constitutional Republic into a Marxist State was the dishonest Marxist Manchurian Candidate, Barrack Husein Obama, who misled Patriotic Americans to believe he intended to heal racial strife, but instead he has continued to aggravate and pour salt on that wound ever since his election; he continues to create policies that increase the racial strife in the US Armed Forces and on College campuses.



Obama, his fellow Marxist allies, including Michelle Obama, Valeri Jaret, the Radical Islamic Iranian Mullahs, Susan Rice, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, the Cuban Communist Party, George Soros, the UN WHO Director Tedros Ghebreyesus, Hillary Clinton, the Venezuelan Communist Party, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, John Brennan, Leon Panetta, Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, Ilhan Oman, and the elected Socialist Democrats in the US Senate and the US House have been working for over 65 years to destroy the US Constitutional Republic.



A Dark Money Network was exposed in the book, “Arabella: The Dark Money Network of Leftist Billionaires Secretly Transforming America” by Scott Walter. It consists of wealthy Progressive Leftists and Radical Marxist Organizations that have been funding the Cultural Marxist Programs in the US for over 50 years. They have been buying up radio networks, taking control of newspapers, buying TV Networks, taking control of media outlets, and have taken control of the Democrat Party and turned it into the Socialist Democrat Party. Their goal has been to instill their failed Marxist ideology into the culture of the United States; Marxism has never worked in any country over the past 150 years.



The Mega donors funding the Marxist Dark Money programs, to destroy the US Constitutional Republic, are promoting the invasion of the US by over 16 million Illegal Aliens from 180 countries, supporting the anti-police lawlessness, tearing down the US Justice System, and are violating the US Constitution. They include the Ford Foundation, Jeff Bezos, the Rockefeller Foundation, George Soros, the Chinese Communist Party, Mark Zukerberg, the Socialist Democrat Party, Mark Cuban, the Tides Foundation, and Bill Gates. The money is being used to tear down Patriotic America, indoctrinate America’s youth in Marxism, and eliminate the impressive US History of the Republic.



We recommend that every Patriotic American Citizen who receives this E-mail, should share the below listed historic information about the Marxist’s plan to destroy the US Constitutional Republic, with your fellow American Patriots. We encourage you to help us fight to prevent Obama and his fellow Marxist allies from succeeding in perpetrating their planned massive Voter Fraud to steal the 2024 Presidential Election, so they can change the US Constitutional Republic into a Marxist State.

United We Stand



If you're still reading, click that link and finish.

Star and flag, share I don't care, just get the word out and be brave enough to stand United.

Because we will fall if we don't.


edit on 10-6-2024 by ADVISOR because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 07:21 PM
link   
And a primer on how they plan to do it here, I have added in other threads, there is a short book called "Rules for Radicals".



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 07:41 PM
link   
a reply to: ADVISOR

umm dude, do you realize what it is your reading? It is not exactly hidden in the rant. If you do not see it that is fine but it is glaring one in the face. Interesting read though as I always love reading others opinions.



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 08:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman
And a primer on how they plan to do it here, I have added in other threads, there is a short book called "Rules for Radicals".
Prairie Fire is another

I think it’s a combination of Marxism and the coveted “brain power” brought over by Operation Paper Clip.

Ya know in order to stop the Soviets from attaining Nazi secret intel and programs.

Yet those folks brought more than brain power and secret projects that spawned everything from MKUltra to Operation Northwoods etc.

The OSS became the CIA right after the war.

Just like Dept of War became Dept. Of Defense.

I’m skeptical but it seems maybe by telling the world Uncle Sam won with the bomb and Adolf’s suicide, there was a perpetuation that the West won WWII outright.

I’m not so sure anymore.

Edit. What a coincidence the good guys always win every war ever according to history books.

Hail HYDRA.
edit on 10-6-2024 by SteamyAmerican because: (no reason given)

edit on 10-6-2024 by SteamyAmerican because: (no reason given)


(post by Euronymous2625 removed for political trolling and baiting)
(post by JinMI removed for a manners violation)

posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 09:46 PM
link   

Radical Marxist Organizations that have been funding the Cultural Marxist Programs in the US for over 50 years. They have been buying up radio networks, taking control of newspapers, buying TV Networks, taking control of media outlets,


Can someone please explain to me how the purchase of these corporate networks by even larger corporate networks is being done by socialists? Seems more that it is Capitalist corporations that have all the money to purchase and operate these network. We are not being over run by socialists but rather by the bastard mutations grown within the womb of the good old Capitalist system itself. Or is it that the entire Capitalist system has already been over taken by the radical Marxists.



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

It's Heil Hydra actually, like Heil Hitler.

Hydra is perfect description.


edit on 10-6-2024 by ADVISOR because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 10:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

Absolutely.

That with Cloward - Piven and Alinsky.

The columns of their "culture", are fifth columns in ours.


a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I believe the answer you're looking for, is yes.

By the way, capitalism is not a form of government.
It's a business model, you know, free trade.


www.britannica.com...
Capitalism | Definition, Characteristics, History ...
Capitalism is a widely adopted economic system in which there is private ownership of the means of production. Modern capitalist systems usually include a market-oriented economy, in which the production and pricing of goods, as well as the income of individuals, are dictated to a greater extent by market forces resulting from interactions between private businesses and individuals than by ...

www.investopedia.com...
What Is Capitalism: Varieties, History, Pros & Cons, Socialism
Capitalism is an economic system in which capital goods are owned by private individuals or businesses. The production of goods and services is based on supply and demand in the general market ...

en.m.wikipedia.org...
Capitalism - Wikipedia
Capitalism is characterized by private ownership of the factors of production. Decision making is decentralized and rests with the owners of the factors of production. Their decision making is coordinated by the market, which provides the necessary information. Material incentives are used to motivate participants.

www.dictionary.com...
CAPITALISM Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
Capitalism definition: an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth..

dictionary.cambridge.org...
CAPITALISM | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
CAPITALISM definition: 1. an economic and political system in which property, business, and industry are controlled by…. Learn more.



It's literally free trade, hence why, commies hate it.
It can't be micro managed, so they cronied their way in.

Hope that helps.
edit on 10-6-2024 by ADVISOR because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 10:14 PM
link   
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

After the fall of the OSS, they created the CIA so it could be infiltrated not even 3 years later.

The agency has been Corrupt, since it's inception.

The OSS, should never been stood down. They were loyal.



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 10:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: Justoneman

Absolutely.

That with Cloward - Piven and Alinsky.

The columns of their "culture", are fifth columns in ours.

Toss in the Khalergi Plan. For good measure.

I think it’s still an award given out to folks like Merkel under the name Charlemagne Award.

edit on 10-6-2024 by SteamyAmerican because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 10:19 PM
link   
a reply to: ADVISOR



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 10:20 PM
link   
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

I believe the point is well understood.
👍 👍

Now the hard part, helping the blind see.

🤠
edit on 10-6-2024 by ADVISOR because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Man, the last time I listened to Sting, was 1980s.

Thanks for the flashback buddy.

LoL


For those wondering what it says;

Soviet news report excerpt:]
"...и премьер охарактеризовала переговоры с главой делегации Михаила Сергеевича Горбачёва как конструктивный, реалистический, типовой и дружественный обмен... ...но послание заложено..."
[English translation:]
"...and the prime minister described the negotiations with the head of the delegation, Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, as a constructive, realistic, typical and friendly exchange... ...but the message is laid..."

In Europe and America there's a growing feeling of hysteria
Conditioned to respond to all the threats
In the rhetorical speeches of the Soviets
Mister Khrushchev said, 'We will bury you'
I don't subscribe to this point of view
It'd be such an ignorant thing to do
If the Russians love their children too

How can I save my little boy
From Oppenheimer's deadly toy?
There is no monopoly of common sense
On either side of the political fence
We share the same biology
Regardless of ideology
Believe me when I say to you
I hope the Russians love their children too

There is no historical precedent to put
The words in the mouth of the president
There's no such thing as a winnable war
It's a lie we don't believe anymore
Mister Reagan says 'We will protect you'
I don't subscribe to this point of view
Believe me when I say to you
I hope the Russians love their children too

We share the same biology
Regardless of ideology
What might save us, me and you
Is if the Russians love their children too

edit on 10-6-2024 by ADVISOR because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 10:48 PM
link   
a reply to: ADVISOR
Certainly it is an economic theory and system of which governments are a useful arm.


It's literally free trade, hence why, commies hate it.
It can't be micro managed, so they cronied their way in.


So, is it your suggestion that the owners, those few owners of the vast majority of our media corporations are really Marxists who are pretending to be Capitalists in order to cronie their way into power. If so, how would a Marxist exploiter pretending to be a Capitalist be any different from a Capitalist exploiter just doing what Capitalist exploiters do?



posted on Jun, 10 2024 @ 11:00 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

It is safe to say the Russians, the Chinese, and most of us love our children enough to do the right thing. Sting did the world a service with this song.

You gained some cool pts here .



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 01:30 AM
link   
a reply to: ADVISOR

Star and flag for you Dear Patriot ⭐️💎



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 07:14 AM
link   
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

It's no different than any other communist/marxist revolution.

Those directing and fomenting it don't necessarily believe in the idiology. They believe in power and control though. They always stay safe and fat in their bubbles of luxury.

The idiology and issues are just the tools and methods used to get the power.

It's how they motivate the useful idiots.

The issue is never the issue, the issue is always the revolution.



posted on Jun, 11 2024 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: watchitburn

You draw it up here just as I see it. It's those who hide behind ''issues'', behind ''ideology'' etc. I also see that way to often ideologues are so enmeshed within their own particular ideology that they are open to accepting into their ranks others, nay, even leaders who say the right words, express the right ideology when in reality they are nothing more than just those who pursue power for themselves.

I also agree with your final statement, that the issue is always the revolution. However I would add to that that I think a real revolution needs a real understanding of who the real oppressor is and not the hyped up image of partisan oppressor who is, most of the time from my point of view, those people who you point to in your comments.

To me, it's not communism but the the power seekers who are either using communism as a means to power OR those power seekers who use ANTIcommunism for the same goal. This follows with or is preceded by those using capitalism or anti capitalism for the same purposes.



posted on Jun, 19 2024 @ 06:30 PM
link   
Why can't it just be right va wrong.

Blurring the lines with isms it seems, is the thing.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join