World bank demands end to farming by 2030

originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: chr0naut

You're a fan of the World Bank now?

It's one of the most universally despised organisations in the world regardless of political leaning or country. Their predatory loans and hyper-capitalist shock therapy have destroyed dozens of developing countries.

Nah, just a realist.

The World bank made those loans because they thought the developing countries could pay them back.

If they didn't expect the countries to pay them back, it was charity.

And most of those developing countries probably have made good on the loans, turning them into GDP for the country, therefore justifying the loan, and enabling them to pay it back.

But no-doubt there have been loan defaulters. Can you blame the lender for that, because they'd be out of pocket, too?

That's the reality of a Capitalist system.

Also, if you are so concerned, I wonder how much money, time or effort you have given to aid developing countries?

Why do all those who are actually trying to help get lumped with blame, and their accusers sit on their wallets and in everything they do, just try and get more for themselves only?

a reply to: Degradation33

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face...

A gust of wind would take most of them out especially big scary Klaus. If the wind doesn't the depreciation of their bank accounts will as they try to manage all of that land.

You cannot negotiate with cancer. No matter how much you talk, no matter how much you ignore it, it will kill you. The same goes with tyrants, and tyranny. The only way this stops, is by putting each and every one of these tyrants in prison, or in the ground. a reply to: ScarletDarkness

a reply to: chr0naut

I Refuse to Eat Sheit to Survive . Yours to . The " World Bank " is just a Pretend World Intiminating Tyrant Corporate Organization Minus Anything of Consequence to Back Up such Outragious Proposals to the People of this Planet . Who Exactly Are the Corporate Heads of this Abomination on the Face of this Earth Anyway , and Why should Anyone Give a Fook what they Think or Imagine > ?

I wonder if there is a legal definition of a domestic vegetable garden that involves a size limit. Gardening may fall generally under agricultural pursuits and therefore within the definition of farming and be part of this initiative. Landscaping and general land management are other aspects that could be possibly within the scope of this agenda. Of course, activities such as hunting and gathering wild resources will be forbidden as this directly interferes with the balance of the natural habitat.

It seems to me that they would have given serious consideration to combining population reduction and an unspoiled natural environment by going straight to eating people.

originally posted by: ARM19688

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: chr0naut

Are you serious?

Didn't watch the video?

Didn't do your own search?

Just going to assume the wef gives a crap about the people?
They're trying to kill us off, we are the carbon they want to reduce.

Especially those of us who stand against globalist cabal.

Don't you want clean food?!

UN & World Economic Forum Behind Global “War On Farmers”

The escalating regulatory attack on agricultural producers from Holland and the United States to Sri Lanka and beyond is closely tied to the United Nations “Agenda 2030” Sustainable Development Goals and the U.N.’s partners at the World Economic Forum (WEF), numerous experts told The Epoch Times.

Indeed, several of the U.N.’s 17 “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) are directly implicated in policies that are squeezing farmers, ranchers, and food supplies around the world.

High-level Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members within the U.N. system helped create the SDGs and are currently helping lead the U.N.’s implementation of the global plan, The Epoch Times has previously documented.
You will eat ze bugs, own nothing and be happy

OMG.

This is so funny.

You think the World Bank is trying to cut off its main source of income.

And that the world is run by a conference company, the WEF.

And that 'they' are going to have the production capability to be able to feed the world with insects.

And that the CCP is directing the most capitalist organizations on the planet.

I suppose they are all shape-shifting lizzids, too running their evil pedo rings out of family pizza restaurants, too?

You are guzzling the kool-aid so fast you should really stop to breathe - or your brain might be starved for oxygen.

Well it would be funny yes, if it wasn’t true. You just have your head in the sand or somewhere else entirely. Are you actually involved in farming? I am and we are being strangled at every turn. It is deliberate and it is methodical. Your approach and motivations appear obvious, though, so no worries. I mean we are here to deny ignorance, so perhaps information from those with actual experience might carry a bit more weight, more than robotic rebuttal.

I have been involved in farming, running some stock on my property where I currently live. My son in law and daughter were share-farmers on a property that had nearly 80 times the stock I ran.

I always got good prices at the stockyard because of the care I gave to my stock and because I ran smaller numbers, and didn't run stock to the potential capacity of the farm. I also didn't particularly use many agrichemicals or supplement feed, if I could avoid it (grass-fed, except for locally baled straw in drought seasons). The farm was certified organic.

The farm also includes a small orchard and gardens that were planted according to permaculture principles. I largely let the orchard grow wild. Produce was for the family, or given away at church. The orchard is still a viable food-forest but the garden is fallow at the moment.

I was never in farming for the money (I had separate income streams) but I can appreciate how farming for profit could be difficult. I have seen it.

I don't think it is because governments or authorities are trying to throttle farming, though. I think it is because commercialism is counter to good balance in farm management.

Farming purely for profit leads to depleted land, malnourished and overcrowded stock, excess fuel and chemical use, and occasionally plague proportion pest species. It's big income, for a while, but turns around and becomes more and more costly over time.

If you are growing produce I suggest reading up on permaculture and biodynamic farming as a basis for planning, and pre-estimate sustainable yields and stick to maintaining that, rather than expecting more, more, more.

Also, volcanic soil and a good sub-tropical climate in New Zealand has meant it has been a good place for farming.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

I Refuse to Eat Sheit to Survive . Yours to . The " World Bank " is just a Pretend World Intiminating Tyrant Corporate Organization Minus Anything of Consequence to Back Up such Outragious Proposals to the People of this Planet . Who Exactly Are the Corporate Heads of this Abomination on the Face of this Earth Anyway , and Why should Anyone Give a Fook what they Think or Imagine > ?

Manure has been the cheapest fertilizer of choice of many of the foods you consume regularly, and has been so waaay back into pre-history.

I'm fairly sure that the World Bank, the Democratic Party, the CCP, alien cannibalistic pedo lizzid people, the USSR, the WHO, the WEF, the Bilderburgers, the Rothschilds, and any other pariah you can invent, had anything to do with that.

originally posted by: TheMichiganSwampBuck
I wonder if there is a legal definition of a domestic vegetable garden that involves a size limit. Gardening may fall generally under agricultural pursuits and therefore within the definition of farming and be part of this initiative. Landscaping and general land management are other aspects that could be possibly within the scope of this agenda. Of course, activities such as hunting and gathering wild resources will be forbidden as this directly interferes with the balance of the natural habitat.

It seems to me that they would have given serious consideration to combining population reduction and an unspoiled natural environment by going straight to eating people.

I though that the National Parks and Wildlife services of multiple countries use hunting to help manage balance and especially in regard to invasive species in natural habitats?

And cannibalism would lead to significant and uncontrollable levels of existing endemic disease, as well as specific diseases like Kuru that spread only by cannibalism.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: chr0naut

Are you serious?

Didn't watch the video?

Didn't do your own search?

Just going to assume the wef gives a crap about the people?
They're trying to kill us off, we are the carbon they want to reduce.

Especially those of us who stand against globalist cabal.

Don't you want clean food?!

UN & World Economic Forum Behind Global “War On Farmers”


The escalating regulatory attack on agricultural producers from Holland and the United States to Sri Lanka and beyond is closely tied to the United Nations “Agenda 2030” Sustainable Development Goals and the U.N.’s partners at the World Economic Forum (WEF), numerous experts told The Epoch Times.

Indeed, several of the U.N.’s 17 “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) are directly implicated in policies that are squeezing farmers, ranchers, and food supplies around the world.

High-level Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members within the U.N. system helped create the SDGs and are currently helping lead the U.N.’s implementation of the global plan, The Epoch Times has previously documented.
You will eat ze bugs, own nothing and be happy

OMG.

This is so funny.

You think the World Bank is trying to cut off its main source of income.

And that the world is run by a conference company, the WEF.

And that 'they' are going to have the production capability to be able to feed the world with insects.

And that the CCP is directing the most capitalist organizations on the planet.

I suppose they are all shape-shifting lizzids, too running their evil pedo rings out of family pizza restaurants, too?

You are guzzling the kool-aid so fast you should really stop to breathe - or your brain might be starved for oxygen.

You mean this thing from wef ????

www.weforum.org...

Insect protein has high-quality properties and can be used as an alternative source of protein throughout the food chain, from feed for aquaculture to ingredients for nutritional supplements for humans and pets. All animal species, regardless of their diet, eat insects in their natural diet.

Straight from their own website

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: TheMichiganSwampBuck
I wonder if there is a legal definition of a domestic vegetable garden that involves a size limit. Gardening may fall generally under agricultural pursuits and therefore within the definition of farming and be part of this initiative. Landscaping and general land management are other aspects that could be possibly within the scope of this agenda. Of course, activities such as hunting and gathering wild resources will be forbidden as this directly interferes with the balance of the natural habitat.

It seems to me that they would have given serious consideration to combining population reduction and an unspoiled natural environment by going straight to eating people.

I though that the National Parks and Wildlife services of multiple countries use hunting to help manage balance and especially in regard to invasive species in natural habitats?

And cannibalism would lead to significant and uncontrollable levels of existing endemic disease, as well as specific diseases like Kuru that spread only by cannibalism.

Why yes, of course, wildlife management hunts. Have you tried any of that? I haven't, never had the meat from it either, I wonder who does? And as far as diseases from things like human brain tissue and whatnot, that will cull even more humans, a win-win.

I see you conveniently left out a response concerning a legal definition of a garden and its size, the real gist of my post. The rest of my comments were merely to bait a response like you gave me or to rile up the Chicken Little gang. I don't why I bother with that, it bores me so as it is all too predictable.

originally posted by: TheMichiganSwampBuck

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: TheMichiganSwampBuck
I wonder if there is a legal definition of a domestic vegetable garden that involves a size limit. Gardening may fall generally under agricultural pursuits and therefore within the definition of farming and be part of this initiative. Landscaping and general land management are other aspects that could be possibly within the scope of this agenda. Of course, activities such as hunting and gathering wild resources will be forbidden as this directly interferes with the balance of the natural habitat.

It seems to me that they would have given serious consideration to combining population reduction and an unspoiled natural environment by going straight to eating people.

I though that the National Parks and Wildlife services of multiple countries use hunting to help manage balance and especially in regard to invasive species in natural habitats?

And cannibalism would lead to significant and uncontrollable levels of existing endemic disease, as well as specific diseases like Kuru that spread only by cannibalism.

Why yes, of course, wildlife management hunts. Have you tried any of that? I haven't, never had the meat from it either, I wonder who does?

A fair few people apparently.

I'm not an American or a hunter, but why don't you give it a try if that floats your boat?

Hunting - National Park Service

And as far as diseases from things like human brain tissue and whatnot, that will cull even more humans, a win-win.

I see you conveniently left out a response concerning a legal definition of a garden and its size, the real gist of my post. The rest of my comments were merely to bait a response like you gave me or to rile up the Chicken Little gang. I don't why I bother with that, it bores me so as it is all too predictable.

I do note that many of these alleged 'lefties' are promoting 'community gardens' in cities, too.

Sometimes I think that the right-hand doesn't know what they accuse the left-hand of doing, and the right-hand aren't doing much else!



I did find this:

The USDA is not requiring people to register home gardens, despite posts | Fact check

and this:

Fact check: False claim food plant fires are evidence of planned food shortages

Looks like the fringe rightards are in full doom-porn flight...

a reply to: RAY1990

I'm sick of people fearing these "elites". It gives them undo recognition. It's like a preference to see some wicked master controlling your world. You might as well craft little trinkets to toss at statues of them.

I really think they are overblown. Just a rich philanthropist jackass that wants to look like he cares about the planet. Behind all their climate pandering I feel is a distinct belief their getting together to save the world from Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize hell.

They are the full-on self-interest side of leading by example. It shows the benefit of faking altruism can be profitable.

World bank demands end to farming by 2030

I'd bet real money that whoever said this has never been outside of a large city.

World bank demands end to farming by 2030

I'd bet real money that whoever said this has never been outside of a large city.

a reply to: chr0naut

I'd much rather be alive for many decades longer in an environment where a small injury does not mean sepsis and death, and where I can enjoy reasonable health.

Right because subsistence living automatically means you don’t have access to basic hygiene. So much ignorance on so many topics from you.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ARM19688

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: chr0naut

Are you serious?

Didn't watch the video?

Didn't do your own search?

Just going to assume the wef gives a crap about the people?
They're trying to kill us off, we are the carbon they want to reduce.

Especially those of us who stand against globalist cabal.

Don't you want clean food?!

UN & World Economic Forum Behind Global “War On Farmers”

The escalating regulatory attack on agricultural producers from Holland and the United States to Sri Lanka and beyond is closely tied to the United Nations “Agenda 2030” Sustainable Development Goals and the U.N.’s partners at the World Economic Forum (WEF), numerous experts told The Epoch Times.

Indeed, several of the U.N.’s 17 “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) are directly implicated in policies that are squeezing farmers, ranchers, and food supplies around the world.

High-level Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members within the U.N. system helped create the SDGs and are currently helping lead the U.N.’s implementation of the global plan, The Epoch Times has previously documented.
You will eat ze bugs, own nothing and be happy

OMG.

This is so funny.

You think the World Bank is trying to cut off its main source of income.

And that the world is run by a conference company, the WEF.

And that 'they' are going to have the production capability to be able to feed the world with insects.

And that the CCP is directing the most capitalist organizations on the planet.

I suppose they are all shape-shifting lizzids, too running their evil pedo rings out of family pizza restaurants, too?

You are guzzling the kool-aid so fast you should really stop to breathe - or your brain might be starved for oxygen.

Well it would be funny yes, if it wasn’t true. You just have your head in the sand or somewhere else entirely. Are you actually involved in farming? I am and we are being strangled at every turn. It is deliberate and it is methodical. Your approach and motivations appear obvious, though, so no worries. I mean we are here to deny ignorance, so perhaps information from those with actual experience might carry a bit more weight, more than robotic rebuttal.

I have been involved in farming, running some stock on my property where I currently live. My son in law and daughter were share-farmers on a property that had nearly 80 times the stock I ran.

I always got good prices at the stockyard because of the care I gave to my stock and because I ran smaller numbers, and didn't run stock to the potential capacity of the farm. I also didn't particularly use many agrichemicals or supplement feed, if I could avoid it (grass-fed, except for locally baled straw in drought seasons). The farm was certified organic.

The farm also includes a small orchard and gardens that were planted according to permaculture principles. I largely let the orchard grow wild. Produce was for the family, or given away at church. The orchard is still a viable food-forest but the garden is fallow at the moment.

I was never in farming for the money (I had separate income streams) but I can appreciate how farming for profit could be difficult. I have seen it.

I don't think it is because governments or authorities are trying to throttle farming, though. I think it is because commercialism is counter to good balance in farm management.

Farming purely for profit leads to depleted land, malnourished and overcrowded stock, excess fuel and chemical use, and occasionally plague proportion pest species. It's big income, for a while, but turns around and becomes more and more costly over time.

If you are growing produce I suggest reading up on permaculture and biodynamic farming as a basis for planning, and pre-estimate sustainable yields and stick to maintaining that, rather than expecting more, more, more.

Also, volcanic soil and a good sub-tropical climate in New Zealand has meant it has been a good place for farming.

Surprised you have/had the time. Thread infection is at plague proportions.

originally posted by: ScarletDarkness
They will try to take total control of the food supply this is certain. This is 100% about control.

Yep. NWO. One World Government. We all will be slaves to the state.

originally posted by: AllisVibration
a reply to: chr0naut

I'd much rather be alive for many decades longer in an environment where a small injury does not mean sepsis and death, and where I can enjoy reasonable health.

Right because subsistence living automatically means you don’t have access to basic hygiene.

Yes, that is what it means.

All the mod cons like running treated and purified water from reticulated plumbing, sewage and waste disposal systems, antiseptics, antibiotics, immunizations don't exist.

Imagine how much fun it must be to go to the toilet in a hole in the ground and you reach for the toilet paper, but there isn't any. And the toilet never flushes, and there's no running water in a sink, nor is there any soap.

You'd better hope that leaf holds together enough to wipe with, and that someone isn't defecating in the source of where you wash and get your drinking and cooking water from!

originally posted by: ARM19688

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ARM19688

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: chr0naut

Are you serious?

Didn't watch the video?

Didn't do your own search?

Just going to assume the wef gives a crap about the people?
They're trying to kill us off, we are the carbon they want to reduce.

Especially those of us who stand against globalist cabal.

Don't you want clean food?!

UN & World Economic Forum Behind Global “War On Farmers”

The escalating regulatory attack on agricultural producers from Holland and the United States to Sri Lanka and beyond is closely tied to the United Nations “Agenda 2030” Sustainable Development Goals and the U.N.’s partners at the World Economic Forum (WEF), numerous experts told The Epoch Times.

Indeed, several of the U.N.’s 17 “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) are directly implicated in policies that are squeezing farmers, ranchers, and food supplies around the world.

High-level Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members within the U.N. system helped create the SDGs and are currently helping lead the U.N.’s implementation of the global plan, The Epoch Times has previously documented.
You will eat ze bugs, own nothing and be happy

OMG.

This is so funny.

You think the World Bank is trying to cut off its main source of income.

And that the world is run by a conference company, the WEF.

And that 'they' are going to have the production capability to be able to feed the world with insects.

And that the CCP is directing the most capitalist organizations on the planet.

I suppose they are all shape-shifting lizzids, too running their evil pedo rings out of family pizza restaurants, too?

You are guzzling the kool-aid so fast you should really stop to breathe - or your brain might be starved for oxygen.

Well it would be funny yes, if it wasn’t true. You just have your head in the sand or somewhere else entirely. Are you actually involved in farming? I am and we are being strangled at every turn. It is deliberate and it is methodical. Your approach and motivations appear obvious, though, so no worries. I mean we are here to deny ignorance, so perhaps information from those with actual experience might carry a bit more weight, more than robotic rebuttal.

I have been involved in farming, running some stock on my property where I currently live. My son in law and daughter were share-farmers on a property that had nearly 80 times the stock I ran.

I always got good prices at the stockyard because of the care I gave to my stock and because I ran smaller numbers, and didn't run stock to the potential capacity of the farm. I also didn't particularly use many agrichemicals or supplement feed, if I could avoid it (grass-fed, except for locally baled straw in drought seasons). The farm was certified organic.

The farm also includes a small orchard and gardens that were planted according to permaculture principles. I largely let the orchard grow wild. Produce was for the family, or given away at church. The orchard is still a viable food-forest but the garden is fallow at the moment.

I was never in farming for the money (I had separate income streams) but I can appreciate how farming for profit could be difficult. I have seen it.

I don't think it is because governments or authorities are trying to throttle farming, though. I think it is because commercialism is counter to good balance in farm management.

Farming purely for profit leads to depleted land, malnourished and overcrowded stock, excess fuel and chemical use, and occasionally plague proportion pest species. It's big income, for a while, but turns around and becomes more and more costly over time.

If you are growing produce I suggest reading up on permaculture and biodynamic farming as a basis for planning, and pre-estimate sustainable yields and stick to maintaining that, rather than expecting more, more, more.

Also, volcanic soil and a good sub-tropical climate in New Zealand has meant it has been a good place for farming.

Surprised you have/had the time. Thread infection is at plague proportions.

Farming, as I did it, wasn't a full-time job. And there was always family, friends, neighbourly assistance and veterinary help to hand if I ever needed them (the same as I gave assistance when they needed it).

originally posted by: AllisVibration
a reply to: chr0naut

I'd much rather be alive for many decades longer in an environment where a small injury does not mean sepsis and death, and where I can enjoy reasonable health.

Right because subsistence living automatically means you don’t have access to basic hygiene. So much ignorance on so many topics from you.

I know it is hard to see past the apparent attitudes but there is a middle ground where you live a balanced life in both the natural world and in the man-made world. If you want to do some rustic camping, I suggest that you get a copy of the Boy Scout Handbook, read it, and practice it. A greenhorn would get a lot of experience that way and be better prepared if they had to sleep rough.

As a civilized person used to a comfortable lifestyle, hard physical activities, and a nutritional diet are important of course. However, a soft sheltered lifestyle and a lack of real-world experience will make you vulnerable and weak. Being fat and lazy in the city will kill you as dead as being stupid and inexperienced in the wild.