History Repeating Itself Before Our Eyes

a reply to: CarlLaFong

I heard somewhere that the bird is the word.

originally posted by: charlest2
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

The audacity and hypocrisy of this son of a bitch. He left the event early. D Day commemorative cerimonies.
Jill, Ed.D., escorts Joe Biden out as French President Macron stays behind to greet veterans
X

In stark contrast, here is that same event with Trump attending.

Macron follows Biden about two seconds after Biden and his wife start walking to the edge of the stage. Biden talks briefly with several people on the way out, as did Macron. Macron is not standing around (in this video) talking to people while Biden makes a hasty exit.

And the Trump video? Fewer interactions than Biden had with the crowd.

Not sure what you intended, but the videos don't match the verbiage here.

a reply to: Byrd

That's true.

As an outsider, I think both Trump and Biden are, in their own ways, unfit for office.

What I am seeing is massive polarisation.

Orange man bad, evil Dems TDS, but then you get Biden, worst President ever, peodophile, crime family, etc.

The hatred and division is equally strong on both sides.

Isn't it time that the US just pulled together, for the common good?

And had candidates that were a better choice than between a senile old man and a nearly as old narcissistic rabble raising felon?

originally posted by: cocnutcrab883
a reply to: CarlLaFong

I heard somewhere that the bird is the word.

Word.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: CarlLaFong

Watched it too. Biden should stand down, he's clearly not well. But, I thought he gave a good speech, to be fair.

"I thought the way he colored in the lines was impressive." Yeah, that bar is set pretty low. You think he wrote it???? He probably had to be on a healthyxdust of magic Hunter fust just to read it. Still, he checked his watch while thenparents of the soldiers he killed watched their bodies be carried off. He can rot in hell.

a reply to: Boogerpicker

So much for pulling together for the common good. Divide away....

a reply to: Byrd

I actually agree with you, and I don't like making much ado about nothing. I didn't see Biden act notably different than any other official on the stage when I watched the full video. Well, other than his speech, where he stuttered numerous times, none too badly, but serious stutters all the same.

NOTE TO READERS - I am always objective.

However, Biden attempting to sit down in the imaginary chair WAS disturbing, and this was cut (out) from several of the released video versions. Granted, he'd had a chair to sit down in prior to this point, but his confusion about there not being one was more than notable. Jill Biden obviously noted this with her body language, and tried to distract from it, but there was no distracting from this moment. Biden had two excuses, he had a tablet in his hand, which he likely wanted to set down, BUT he'd set that tablet down earlier. Bottom line...he was lost. You can't deny this. He did not appear to know where he was, what was going on around him, and/or how to function.

Defend Biden as you may, but these things are obvious...and no normal person would do these things. Now, if it was 110F outside and blistering sun, in a 3-piece suit, and body armor, I could see it, but this wasn't the case in Normandy.

Just trying to inject some balance here.

Thanks.

History can instruct people, Snyder begins, even if it does not necessarily repeat itself. Informed by ancient philosophy, the American Founding Fathers feared the rise of tyranny — powerful people using their power to benefit themselves rather than the collective.

Tyranny: A Prologue

If everyone is thinking alike, then no one is thinking.

Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.


Since history repeats, here's a lesson.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Byrd

.

Isn't it time that the US just pulled together, for the common good?

And had candidates that were a better choice than between a senile old man and a nearly as old narcissistic rabble raising felon?

We the People, did pull together and voted for President Trump. Who's not charged with any felonies despite what the mockingbird media would have you believe.

Felons live in prison.

You should realize, we got Trump because of failures by dems under the O'buma Regime.

Now we will get Trump again, because of the persistent failure of dems under the o'biden regime.

Nothing changes, if nothing changes...





Replace Obama with Biden.


Democrats in DC are pathetic, and so are the ignorant fools voting for them.

Dems can't even keep their own cities safe...let alone the Country.

Yuri Bezmenov was correct, listen to what he warned about.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
A very serious question for you:- What would Bon Jovi be like without John Bon Jovi? Answer nothing or should I say a shadow of it's former self. Biden is just a front man, a puppet, haven't you learnt that yet? He's their poster boy, but he can also be used as a patsy come the time when they have to throw someone under the bus. The man hasn't been in charge for years.

a reply to: ADVISOR

Those are some chilling quotes. I had seen Casey's several times before, but not the others.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

RE: HISTORY repeating itself...
1962 all over again.

BREAKING: Four Russian warships and nuclear sub coming to Cuba for military exercises right under Biden’s nose…

therightscoop.com...

Biden is setting us up for direct US-Russia conflict right before the election.
It'll be his 'Hail Mary' to get re-elected.

a reply to: crayzeed

Trust I believe, to a degree, but my point is, there is a limit to what these puppet masters can do. They can do many things, but they lack one important thing...the title. Now, you may think this irrelevant, but it is only irrelevant up to a certain point after which it becomes very relevant. And, that point is global conflict (whatever form that takes). Yes, people could 'program' Biden to do many things, even pehaps (via teleprompter, coaching, whatever) make official declarations of war (as president). However, they won't do this, and here's why...

Even the saddest of strategists will not consciously enter into conflict without thinking they have a chance to win. Why? Because THEY themselves could die. More importantly, that 'hope' of being able to prevail has to be backed up by something of substance, and on a global scale that 'substance' is the nuclear option. That's the big stick, and without it losing is a very real proposition. That is the one thing no puppet master can stand in for the title of 'President' on. So, what would happen is, the moment that became the only remaining option the whole charade would have to be exposed for what it is, a charade.

Now, could someone stand over the shoulder of the president and pull the 'stings' in such a way to execute some sort of a diabolical plan. I suppose, but it would require full conscious will from the president to carry out. That may not be as easy as one thinks.

In any case, if this is what is really happening behind the scenes, this republic has already been destroyed without the public knowing it. There's only so much stuff which could be kept secret by these puppet masters. As long as things are bumping along, all the collateral parties who know the real story can be managed. But when the situation escalates to something as serious as the nuclear option, those parties are no longer going to remain silent. There's just too many of them. And, the reason for this is...they have families of their own, and they don't have a death wish. Loyalty only goes so far.

Now, you may think I'm an idealist (how bizarre is that, in the context of this discussion), but I don't think I am being idealistic with the words I say here, more just objective.

Anyway, those are my thoughts on your statement. So, yes, to your question; I do realize there are others pulling 'some' of the strings. Where our viewpoints diverge is when things get more serious.

I can agree with you with the nuclear option on the table, but, quite a few thousand men/ women get killed in "normal" warfare before that stage and that is where these "strategists" know they are safe in the knowledge that they would, 1. not be called to die for their country, but more importantly 2. they will not be held accountable. And in saying so there is an awful lot of "war hawks" in the US government that want a war, but more importantly a war they have no chance of winning. So with the whole sewerage farm of crap they hold over Biden he would just roll over and agree.
People do not realise the implications of Biden "giving" the green light for Zelenski to strike Russia itself. This is just like Vietnam, for a start they allude to "no boots on the ground" lie and from there it can escalate. Whether is was actually Biden (or his handlers) that came out with that is mute when the sh## hits the fan.

a reply to: crayzeed

No argument on any of your points.