No one is above the law....

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: network dude

FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE Penal Law § 175.10 (Committed on or after November 1, 1986) The (specify ) count is Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree. Under our law, a person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when, with intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof, that person: Select appropriate alternative: makes or causes a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or alters, erases, obliterates, deletes, removes or destroys a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or omits to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which he or she knows to be imposed upon him or her by law or by the nature of his or her position; or prevents the making of a true entry or causes the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise.1 The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning: ENTERPRISE means any entity of one or more persons, corporate or otherwise, public or private, engaged in business,

nycourts.gov..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">link to PDF.

This is what Trump was charged and convicted of.

I must have missed the important parts of the case. Trump either did, or conspired to alter the books, or make false entrys into his books. That is what is claimed here. The jury found him guilty. So who can explain what records he falisified? that part should be easy. It's in evidence. Jury conviced on it. Was it the payment to Cohen? The payment to the whore? The one's he didn't hide?

I have been trying to understand this, and to date, not ONE person has been able to explain it. Almost as if they are all really assholes and don't know anything other than OMB.

It's not complicated.
The indictment was not for the false entries (they were not false anyway - they were legal expenses unless accounting practices have now got a new entry in the ledger for 'paying off a whore')
The indictment was for a false book keeping entry to conceal a campaign finance violation - that the FEC already investigated and cleared as being OK.
In other words there is no book keeping issue or campaign finance violation anywhere in sight.

None of the above matters though and the actual words written in the indictment are completely irrelevant.
The strength of the case was not ever the driving force here.

You need to stop thinking about what is fair/just/right - those days are long gone.

You are correct, in many places in the US there is no justice for non-liberal leftists anymore.

Even regular people are no longer getting justice in Dem run cities, as criminals have more rights than victims, and victims who fight back are prosecuted rather than the criminal. There is no real justice in Dem land.

originally posted by: Dercones

originally posted by: Tolkien
a reply to: theatreboy

Rigged trial

Rigged conviction


The US has officially degraded to a banana republic, where political opponents are put on trial in kangaroo courts.

I ve see this argument made quite a lot by Trump supporter. Why is the US a banana Republic? Is it because Trump was convicted? I think you are making the same argument as many others have made so far with no much evidence provided.

A lot more evidence than was provided during this Kangaroo court trial
The judge actually instructed the jury that :
"To find Trump guilty of felony-level falsification of business documents, the jury must unanimously find that Trump falsified the documents in order to commit or conceal a separate crime. But the jurors do not all have to agree on what that separate crime was, Justice Juan Merchan ruled."
www.politico.com...

Maybe some jurors think that this separate crime was that he blasphemed the Biden name
Other jurors might think that the crime was that he hurt Stormy's fweelings
Or maybe Trump's crime is that it was Hillary's turn in 2016 and he took that from her

The jurors don't have to agree what this separate crime was
Just unanimously find Trump guilty on account of "because"

Kangaroo court

Nothing to do with supporting Trump or not
You should be concerned about this kind of "legal reasonning" by which anybody can be found guilty of anything if you piss off the powerful

QED

Well, I predicted correctly.

Rep. Thompson Democrat in Congress is trying to get Trump's Secret Service Protection taken away.

The Dems/liberals may actually be going to try and Arkencide/Epstein Trump if he goes to jail.

If they do that, we will know the true character of the Democrat Party and their supporters who will cheer and throw parties after Trump is Epsteined/Arkencided.

We are living in dangerous times for conservatives who no longer have justice under the law.

We will officially be a dictatorship by political party if this happens.

I fear for the average American Republican who Hillary Clinton in 2020 and a few months ago was saying should be put in formal reeducation. (camps?)

originally posted by: TheSingleBillie
Well, I predicted correctly.

Rep. Thompson Democrat in Congress is trying to get Trump's Secret Service Protection taken away.

The Dems/liberals may actually be going to try and Arkencide/Epstein Trump if he goes to jail.

If they do that, we will know the true character of the Democrat Party and their supporters who will cheer and throw parties after Trump is Epsteined/Arkencided.

We are living in dangerous times for conservatives who no longer have justice under the law.

We will officially be a dictatorship by political party if this happens.

I fear for the average American Republican who Hillary Clinton in 2020 and a few months ago was saying should be put in formal reeducation. (camps?)

Yes, removal of secret service and jail is what they are after.
They have been searching for the key since 2015.

a reply to: theatreboy

^This.

It is not debatable that Joe Biden is guilty of illegally stealing classified Documents. HE WAS NOT PRESIDENT...HE WAS A SENATOR. HE HAD ZERO AUTHORITY TO HAVE ANY CLASSIFIED DOCUMENT.

And to top that...HE GAVE THE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS TO HIS BIOGRAPHER TO HELP HIM WRITE A BOOK.

The idea that Hur let him off the hook, the Weiss has let Hunter Biden off the hook for his 2012-2016 unpaid income taxes, and that the sitting Republican Congress has not defunded the DOJ until those two + Wray + Garland are removed is sad.

a reply to: TheSingleBillie

The answer to even thing, is buy more ammunition.

Literally, just keep buying ammo.

🙏 for peace prepare for 🐺

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: TheSingleBillie

The answer to even thing, is buy more ammunition.

Literally, just keep buying ammo.

🙏 for peace prepare for 🐺

I disagree vehemently.

But understand why you may feel that way.

Still, I don't think that is the answer.