It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Biden administration authorized 'Use of Deadly Force' in Mar-a-Lago raid

page: 6
21
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 22 2024 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

well yeah, I even asked that question on this thread yesterday 😃

you musta miss'd it



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 11:38 AM
link   
This is really about Trump throwing another childish “they’re out to get me” tantrum — again — for his cult.



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 11:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

There is nothing standard about raiding a presidents house. They were undercover as well-hoping for a shootout.

The fact that we’re talking about it right now is the reason it shouldn’t have been done, and isn’t done by any other administration that isn’t smoking crack.



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 11:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

And you chime in to make it all about you with a childish reply that adds nothing to the thread.



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 11:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen




FBI Agents Were Prepared for Secret Service Resistance at Mar-a-Lago: Documents


LOL! No kidding! Did that just occur to you right now!

That didn't occur to when you first heard that armed FBI agents went to Mar a Lago with a search warrant?


Ah so you didn't know armed Secret Service Agents were at Mar-a-Lago even when Trump wasn't there?

Brilliant 🥳️



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 11:55 AM
link   
It is not about being prepared. It is about instructions that if needed engage USSS. I would like you to find another search warrant that states this.

One US Agency was told the could and should prepare to engage with Another US Agency? This is not odd to you?

First, they do have to announce they are coming to USSS. This is for Trumps protection. What about a Rogue FBI Agent? Ruby Ridge Anyone?

If it was such a 'secret' why tell the state governor it is happening?

No. This is Nazi # folks. They have labeled their opposition. They have arrested their opposition. They are trying to convict their opposition.

This is not about the Cheeto.....it is about the end of free America. Take it or leave it it is not up to me to change anyone's mind but I most surely will not be silent.



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: RazorV66

I won't name names, but I swear that half the posters have to wear helmets when they toilet.


I have the perfect remedy for them.



I have a Trump hating neighbor who tried these; took daily for a week and said for all the good they did him he might as well have shoved them up his azz.

True story!



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:08 PM
link   
YOU meant to say if he wasn't running for POTUS again there wouldn't have been a raid. This was flat out BS all the way. All the freaking way.


originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Dandandat3

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Dandandat3

You want an established standard protocol to be amended for one person?



When that one person is a former president of the United States and the top political rival of the current president of the United States; it is only common sence to treat the situation differently than your standard operation. Why is that so hard for you to understand?


There wouldn’t have been a raid if Trump complied and gave back the documents.

Again, a lot of what has happened to him seems clear to be politically motivated. But I just don’t see how it’s weird that the FBI had standard procedures for a raid where they knew armed people would be.

Nothing happened, no one was shot, and Trump wasn’t there.

I don’t see how arguing that politicians should get special treatment under the law helps us citizens from the encroachment of rights they helped enact. They’re the ones who bolstered all the spying and enforcement laws. They’re the ones who cry about it when it gets used on them. And it’s typically the partisans who highlight these cases while ignoring these are the same politicians who made all this possible.



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Myhandle
a reply to: Annee

And you chime in to make it all about you with a childish reply that adds nothing to the thread.


I do not find Trump's childish behavior and tantrums to rile up his base nothing.

They are extremely dangerous to be honest.



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Myhandle
a reply to: Sookiechacha

There is nothing standard about raiding a presidents house. They were undercover as well-hoping for a shootout.

The fact that we’re talking about it right now is the reason it shouldn’t have been done, and isn’t done by any other administration that isn’t smoking crack.


And that right there is about the dumbest thing I have read in a long time. Your diapers need to be changed and eyes wiped.
Just wow



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Myhandle
a reply to: Sookiechacha

There is nothing standard about raiding a presidents house.


Oh, is he above the law?

Long established standard protocols need to be amended for Trump?

No, they don't.



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:15 PM
link   
Anybody know if The FBI highlighted and wrote the deadly force statement in the Biden Search documents like they did in the Trump documents? 😀



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:16 PM
link   
Didn’t they demand cameras to be off when they raided?



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Myhandle
a reply to: Sookiechacha

There is nothing standard about raiding a presidents house.


Oh, is he above the law?

Long established standard protocols need to be amended for Trump?

No, they don't.


Who said they needed to be amended for Trump? 😃



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kaiju666
Didn’t they demand cameras to be off when they raided?


Yes they did !!!! And WE ALL KNOW WHY TOO 😀



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Myhandle
a reply to: Sookiechacha

There is nothing standard about raiding a presidents house.


Oh, is he above the law?

Long established standard protocols need to be amended for Trump?

No, they don't.


Who said they needed to be amended for Trump? 😃


Really?



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:19 PM
link   
Just silliness. Not worth mentioning Trump's childish tantrums.



Donald Trump and some loyal allies, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert, are being called out for raising a major fuss about the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, turning a standard procedure into an alleged personal attack against the former president.

"I just came out of the Biden Witch Hunt Trial in Manhattan, the 'Icebox,' and was shown Reports that Crooked Joe Biden's DOJ, in their illegal and Unconstitutional Raid of Mar-a-Lago, AUTHORIZED THE FBI TO USE DEADLY (LETHAL) FORCE," Trump wrote on Truth Social on May 21.
.

www.msn.com... 2&ei=17



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Dandandat3
"But we are discussing an extremely unprecedented raid on the house of a former president of the United States America, not your run of the mill criminal. "

(Quote function not working today....)

I don't unerstand why the FBI had to perform a raid on MAL. Wouldn't a simple search warrant have made more sense? It looks like they must have been contemplating a deadly confrontation-or were just being mellodramatic for the greatest public opinion effect, knowing most get their opinions from whatever the evening news tells them they should be.

edit on 1/1/1908 by nugget1 because: sp



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Justoneman

You might be right that they possibly handled it differently if wasn’t running.

But I have to imagine they wouldn’t have raided if he just gave back the documents too. He was even public in the fact he was pushing back.



posted on May, 22 2024 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Justoneman

You might be right that they possibly handled it differently if wasn’t running.

But I have to imagine they wouldn’t have raided if he just gave back the documents too. He was even public in the fact he was pushing back.


There was no raid.

His lawyers knew everything. They knew when the FBI were coming.

They knew about the search warrant.

Calling it a raid -- is just more MAGA hyperbole.



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join