Biden administration authorized 'Use of Deadly Force' in Mar-a-Lago raid

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: DBCowboy

How many times has a Democrat lawmaker arrested a Republican with deadly force?

Well we can count this episode as one.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: DBCowboy

How many times has a Democrat lawmaker arrested a Republican with deadly force?

Well we can count this episode as one.

What lawmaker from any party has met deadly force?

Hell, I can’t think of any notable one who has actually has actually done time for anything.

I will admit, the rhetoric in the public sphere has been incredibly charged. If we went off that, all of them are Nazis, commies, and deserve the noose of life in prison. Haven’t seen any action close though.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

What administration other than this one has authorized it against the property of a former president>

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Does Not " Deadly Force " being Authorized by Law Enforcement Signal in their Reasoning that " Suspects " are Armed and Dangerous ?

Show me any FBI raid that doesn't allow their agents to use deadly force.

That's like expecting a SWAT team to come in with nerf guns and super soakers.

-Related-

The FBI operates as if there is no authority overseeing them, or able to hold them accountable.

Lying to a Federal Magistrate in order make Raiding a former President's home, is nothing to them...

FBI did not disclose Trump’s Jan. 19, 2021 declassification order of Russiagate documents to the federal magistrate judge in warrant affidavit.

The federal warrant affidavit the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) relied on to search former President Donald Trump’s residence in Palm Beach, Fla., Mar-a-Lago — at least its redacted version — bears no mention of a Jan. 19, 2021 declassification order by Trump of documents related to the Justice Department’s investigation of Trump that falsely accused him and his 2016 presidential campaign of being Russian agents.

More at: dailytorch.com... in-warrant-affidavit/

The FBI still thinks it deserves a shiny huge new Headquarters Building, LOL. They would have had it by now if the agency was HONEST and more Pro-America/American.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: CriticalStinker

What administration other than this one has authorized it against the property of a former president>

Isn’t an example that I can recall.

But I also can’t recall a president who had tried to reduce the power of the government to go after individuals.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Does Not " Deadly Force " being Authorized by Law Enforcement Signal in their Reasoning that " Suspects " are Armed and Dangerous ?

How many raids do LEO go into unarmed?

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Does Not " Deadly Force " being Authorized by Law Enforcement Signal in their Reasoning that " Suspects " are Armed and Dangerous ?

How many raids do LEO go into unarmed?

How Many " Raids " went Into a Former Commander in Chief's Personal Home with a Very " Suspect " Warrant and with the Situation of facing Armed FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Secret Service Agents SWORE to Protect the Life of the Person in their Charge ? Answer - NONE . This incident has set a Constitutional Precedent in Motion .

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

And you would have been upset if the Clinton’s got raided with their secret service?

I wouldn’t be. I won’t get upset if any of these inside trading asshole, who also used their power to create more federal power get targeted by the system they helped create.

All of the recent admins have gone after speech. Assange and other whistleblowers got charged for espionage even if no evidence was presented for collaboration with a foreign entity.

Hypocrites, the lot of them.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Yes.

If plotiticians were treated equally to Trump, there would be some consistency.

..but that's not the case now is it.

This lawfare is all directed at one person and their orbit.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Yes.

If plotiticians were treated equally to Trump, there would be some consistency.

..but that's not the case now is it.

This lawfare is all directed at one person and their orbit.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

" And you would have been upset if the Clinton’s got raided with their secret service? "

Hmm... I'll Bite . YES . Bill is also a former Commander In Chief . Imagine if Thomas Jefferson's Administration Ordered a " Raid " like that on George Washington ? The mere thought of that Premise is Silly .

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Than I guess we’re at a crossroads of politicians saying they’ll do something and others doing it.

Maybe the problem is an environment of people believing their politics supersede rights. The public discourse certainly seems to validate that possibility.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Have I not indicated I believe he’s been politically targeted?

I’d even argue I’ve pointed out his treatment is unique.

I’ll admit I deviate from a lot of people by pointing out he didn’t do anything to put a leash on such federal powers. He’s also vocally advocated for the feds going after politicians. Though, I’ll admit the government didn’t act on such calls under his admin.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

No , the Problem is that some Unscrupulous members of the U.S. Federal Government are Abusing or Overreaching their Legal Authority in Attacking those whom they Consider a Political Enemy through Legal " Loopholes " in the Law . That Needs to be Addressed and Corrected Immediately or Our Country " Ruled by Law " Loses it Meaning ....(

May 21, 2024

WHY "deadly force" was authorized, in order to obtain these documents from President Trump's home..

Some people are expressing shock that the FBI was prepared to use deadly force against President Trump and his Secret Service security detail during the DOJ raid on Mar-a-Lago. Julie Kelly has the DETAILS HERE.

I am not surprised in the least. Remember, the objective of the FBI raid was to re-secure the physical evidence that President Trump had, which demonstrated how the DOJ and FBI action in 2016 was targeting him, using the power of their law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

The origination of all the DOJ/FBI/IC issues goes back to the ’15/’16 FBI exploitation of the NSA database; this is not a contested discussion issue – it’s just continually forgotten.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago, just like the Robert Mueller investigation, was part of the long standing coverup operation.

The FBI was looking for what Trump took with him as evidence of the weaponized system that targeted him. The FBI wanted that back. The FBI was willing to use deadly force to get it back, if that’s what it took.

Yes, apparently the FBI was prepared to engage in a gun battle or kill people in Mar-a-Lago, in order to retake the evidence against them.

I know it sounds scary, but that’s the reality of our modern FBI. These are not good people. Remember also that AG Merrick Garland said he authorized every facet of the raid.

Continued at: theconservativetreehouse.com... ng-mar-a-lago-raid-to-regain-deep-state-fbi-doj-secrets/#more-260724

Judge Aileen Cannon sees the damning information against the criminal Obama-Biden Administration, and the scum running this major coverup operation.

As a pro-America Patriot, she is not letting this illegitimate case go to trial before January 20, 2025. PERIOD.

How crazy to do over bogus papers. They went in Ninja style too. Begging for a fight. Assholes all who participated in that scam. There was no there there after all. Asshats...

a reply to: Dandandat3

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: DBCowboy

Republicans have called for Hillary to be arrested, and they’ve called other treasonous… which carries a death penalty.

I can’t tell the difference between the two since they both bolster the Patriot act or any legislation that reduces individual rights. Hell, the two parties recently came together to pass bills against speech.

I think both sides just have an issue when they suffer from the policies they helped pass.

She has real crimes with child trafficking and the videos of her on Weiner's laptop won't go away until she does.