Judge Postpones Trump Classified Docs Trial INDEFINITELY

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Deidie

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: chr0naut

Way to deflect. No wonder I mostly refrain from commenting on your posts.

She’s a shill for pfizer . Sat here and begged everyone to get an emergency use vaccine and also was for complete lockdowns . She’s on the side of the global socialists that are destroying our freedoms . May god have mercy on her soul if there is such a person

I'm a guy. A male. CIS gender. A grandfather.

I didn't beg for anyone to get an immunization. It's entirely up to you. I do think immunization against a novel pathogen with a high mortality is a good thing and I'd suggest that 1.5 million Americans dead from COVID-19 are evidence of that.

But it's not novel anymore, and exposure to the virus is as good as immunization, so it is more of a preference these days.

I also see people proclaiming freedom who want a dictatorial right-wing government that legislates against many peoples preferences (LGBTQWERTY, abortion, legalization of benign drugs), so perhaps I'm not that stupid. And perhaps those 'socialists' are actually supporting freedoms the right-wing would remove?

Says the New Zealander who wishes for the resurrection of the mandated 1918 influenza inhalation chambers.
Remember those?

Regardless, you should start reading through the multiple threads on this subject of Jack Smith and the Feds dubious crap they’re trying to pull.
Then you might have a clue what’s really going on and have some better contrary opinions that haven’t been debunked yet.
It’ll save everybody from repeating themselves just because you’re too lazy to go through what’s been posted so far.
Smith and Bratt, along with the fbi, are continuing to ride the line of stepping on constitutional rights of the defendants.

originally posted by: NorthOS
a reply to: chr0naut

Just gotta jump in and point out that quoting “the current president” in the same post where you claim Trumps vocabulary is “numpty” suggests a total lack of awareness.

LOL, just because one person is a numpty, doesn't mean another can't be as bad or worse.

I don't consider either as the sharpest tool in the shed.

a reply to: chr0naut

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Deidie

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: chr0naut

Way to deflect. No wonder I mostly refrain from commenting on your posts.

She’s a shill for pfizer . Sat here and begged everyone to get an emergency use vaccine and also was for complete lockdowns . She’s on the side of the global socialists that are destroying our freedoms . May god have mercy on her soul if there is such a person

I'm a guy. A male. CIS gender. A grandfather.

I didn't beg for anyone to get an immunization. It's entirely up to you. I do think immunization against a novel pathogen with a high mortality is a good thing and I'd suggest that 1.5 million Americans dead from COVID-19 are evidence of that.

But it's not novel anymore, and exposure to the virus is as good as immunization, so it is more of a preference these days.

I also see people proclaiming freedom who want a dictatorial right-wing government that legislates against many peoples preferences (LGBTQWERTY, abortion, legalization of benign drugs), so perhaps I'm not that stupid. And perhaps those 'socialists' are actually supporting freedoms the right-wing would remove?

Says the New Zealander who wishes for the resurrection of the mandated 1918 influenza inhalation chambers.
Remember those?

No, and no.

Regardless, you should start reading through the multiple threads on this subject of Jack Smith and the Feds dubious crap they’re trying to pull.

Then you might have a clue what’s really going on and have some better contrary opinions that haven’t been debunked yet.
It’ll save everybody from repeating themselves just because you’re too lazy to go through what’s been posted so far.
Smith and Bratt, along with the fbi, are continuing to ride the line of stepping on constitutional rights of the defendants.

I thought Trump threw the Constitution out when he tried to take power by means other than that defined in the Constitution?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: chr0naut

Indefinitely does not mean forever.

Let’s see how far the Feds tampering with the evidence goes.

They be a lot closer if feds stuck to procedure than creating a sideshow.

😂

They didn't tamper with evidence, they jumbled up the order of the documents that they seized.

Say's who?!

You have *no* idea what you're talking about.

Do you just make stuff up as you go along?

Wishful thinking at its worst.

/smh

originally posted by: RickinVa
Chain of custody is extremely important in the FBI and other agencies. Having been involved in a few of these, broken chain of custody = dismissal of charges since that evidence and any evidence associated with it is inadmissible in court.

Something like "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" ? 😀

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
In short, this is the planting of evidence by government officials to falsely incriminate a target defendant.
Feds literally STAGED a crime scene, tampering with evidence by using props they brought in specifically to incriminate Trump.

This is clear prosecutorial and government misconduct...as well as, selective prosecution.
ANY of these are absolutely grounds to dismiss the case.

In addition, Jack Smith also was forced to admit he mislead the court and deceived the judge (see above).

Agreed.

This is a complete sh#t show and dumpster fire for the Dems and the Trump prosecutors.

There is NO WAY this trial will continue.

None. Zero.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
It's like the Feds had a party with the evidence.
I'd be more surprised if they didn't plant anything.

Now, they can't prove they didn't.

...Which they probably did.

Which One do you Think Snagged a Pair of Melina's Panties ? A Gift for the Director Maybe ? ........Hmm...

originally posted by: SchrodingersRat

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: chr0naut

Indefinitely does not mean forever.

Let’s see how far the Feds tampering with the evidence goes.

They be a lot closer if feds stuck to procedure than creating a sideshow.

😂

They didn't tamper with evidence, they jumbled up the order of the documents that they seized.

Say's who?!

You have *no* idea what you're talking about.

Do you just make stuff up as you go along?

Wishful thinking at its worst.

/smh

Oh come on, you know it’s true🤣
All these cases have become one giant cluster #. It’s hard to watch. I don’t think most people really realize the impact this all has going forward. It’s about as opposite and far away from democracy you can get. I see it as a modern day lynching of a political opponent.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
It's like the Feds had a party with the evidence.
I'd be more surprised if they didn't plant anything.

Now, they can't prove they didn't.

...Which they probably did.

Which One do you Think Snagged a Pair of Melina's Panties ? A Gift for the Director Maybe ? ........Hmm...

There definitely needs to be a full House Committee investigation on that whole subject!

They need to determine who benefitted the most! 😃

a reply to: chr0naut

" Trump had the documents, which he should not have in his private possession "

By the way , It has been Confirmed in Court that the National Archives sent those Alleged TS Documents to his Mar Lago Home after he Left Office . He Did Not Take Any of them with him .

a reply to: chr0naut

" They are grasping for loopholes when the case is fairly cut-and-dried. "



How so Counselor ? So far the Judge in the Case has said the Prosecutions Lack of Concrete Evidence Against the Defendant is to be Found Wanting of Any Validity to even Suggest Guilt of Any Kind .

a reply to: chr0naut

I learned one thing from Trump Russia collision.

The more libs post and scream is a good induction to spin a case that simply isn’t there.

originally posted by: chr0naut
They are grasping for loopholes when the case is fairly cut-and-dried.

You could post the same about Pence, Biden’s stolen classified documents as senator, and Hilary’s blatant mishandling of classified information.

Yet there was no jail time for them. A legal precedent has been set.

Then add in the mishandling of classified documents for simple theatrics.

😆

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Trump had the documents, which he should not have in his private possession "

By the way , It has been Confirmed in Court that the National Archives sent those Alleged TS Documents to his Mar Lago Home after he Left Office . He Did Not Take Any of them with him .

As Trump departed the White House, aides rushed to pack documents

Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Trump had the documents, which he should not have in his private possession "

By the way , It has been Confirmed in Court that the National Archives sent those Alleged TS Documents to his Mar Lago Home after he Left Office . He Did Not Take Any of them with him .

As Trump departed the White House, aides rushed to pack documents

Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago?

to set him up? Or do you think Trump packed his own boxes?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: chr0naut

" Trump had the documents, which he should not have in his private possession "

By the way , It has been Confirmed in Court that the National Archives sent those Alleged TS Documents to his Mar Lago Home after he Left Office . He Did Not Take Any of them with him .

As Trump departed the White House, aides rushed to pack documents

Can you explain why the National Archives would have transferred classified documents to Mar-A-Lago?

to set him up? Or do you think Trump packed his own boxes?

There's video of Trump's munchkins removing about 24 boxes of documents from the White House on January 20.

One or two boxes, which may have inadvertently contained classified documents, might be reasonable for someone who leaves a job after four years, but the number was too far 'over the top' for Trump to be able to deny it.

I also don't think Trump did anything that he could delegate. He was far too busy with himself.

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: chr0naut

I learned one thing from Trump Russia collision.

The more libs post and scream is a good induction to spin a case that simply isn’t there.

And Trump is taking things with stoic silence? LOL.

If anyone is being histrionic about all this, it's not the Democrats.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: chr0naut

I learned one thing from Trump Russia collision.

The more libs post and scream is a good induction to spin a case that simply isn’t there.

And Trump is taking things with stoic silence? LOL.

If anyone is being histrionic about all this, it's not the Democrats.

Is Trump in jail? After how many which hunts. Everything from violating the constitution from trying to kick Trump off the ballot, illegal FISA warrants, to tampering with the document raid for theatrics. Who is a threat to democracy.

🤪

Wasn’t there supposed to be a second raid? What happen there?