It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: fringeofthefringe
UV light
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee
Do you know with Absolute Certainty what was In those Boxes ? Talk about being Gullible............
originally posted by: matafuchs
Again, this entire case should already be thrown out.
The FBI, under instruction, create a 'fake' crime scene and then leaked it to the press. This is not dropping a dime bag behind a seat for an arrest.
This is the framing of a former US President. If you as an American do not think this is wrong you should not be in this country.
I would not accept if they did it to ANY president or private citizen.
Nothing that would be presented now is credible.
You mean to tell me if they will stage a picture they will not forge documents?
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee
Do you know with Absolute Certainty what was In those Boxes ? Talk about being Gullible............
It's possible Annie is more than what she appears to be in the forum, and helped with the entrapment of Trump. Have you thought of that?
originally posted by: matafuchs
Again, this entire case should already be thrown out.
The FBI, under instruction, create a 'fake' crime scene and then leaked it to the press. This is not dropping a dime bag behind a seat for an arrest.
This is the framing of a former US President. If you as an American do not think this is wrong you should not be in this country.
I would not accept if they did it to ANY president or private citizen.
Nothing that would be presented now is credible.
You mean to tell me if they will stage a picture they will not forge documents?
Source: www.breitbart.com...
....And the trials against him keep him in the spotlight, infuriate his base, who sees him as a martyr and even may serve to make him the object of some sympathy among people in general who believe that his prosecutors are politically motivated. This happens to be true. In my opinion, I doubt the New York indictment would have been brought against a defendant whose name was not Donald Trump. A majority of Americans are skeptical that Trump will be able to get a fair trial according to a CNN poll.”
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee
Do you know with Absolute Certainty what was In those Boxes ? Talk about being Gullible............
It's possible Annie is more than what she appears to be in the forum, and helped with the entrapment of Trump. Have you thought of that?
originally posted by: SchrodingersRat
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee
Do you know with Absolute Certainty what was In those Boxes ? Talk about being Gullible............
It's possible Annie is more than what she appears to be in the forum, and helped with the entrapment of Trump. Have you thought of that?
Annee?
No way in my opinion.
We may disagree at times but I've always found her to be intelligent & reasonable for the most part.
But I'm curious? Who do you think she is that she would have to ability to entrap Trump?
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
Democrats become more depressed with each court decision and revelation. Tomorrow I'll check the "988" statistics. Democrats have been increasingly calling that "help me!" hotline.
originally posted by: SchrodingersRat
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Annee
Do you know with Absolute Certainty what was In those Boxes ? Talk about being Gullible............
It's possible Annie is more than what she appears to be in the forum, and helped with the entrapment of Trump. Have you thought of that?
Annee?
No way in my opinion.
We may disagree at times, but I've always found her to be intelligent & reasonable for the most part.
It's possible Annie is more than what she appears to be in the forum, and helped with the entrapment of Trump. Have you thought of that
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
Democrats become more depressed with each court decision and revelation. Tomorrow I'll check the "988" statistics. Democrats have been increasingly calling that "help me!" hotline.
" One Adam 12 , Please Respond to a Disturbance at the California DNC . Shots Fired..............
Continued at: theconservativetreehouse.com... ng-mar-a-lago-raid-to-regain-deep-state-fbi-doj-secrets/#more-260724
Some people are expressing shock that the FBI was prepared to use deadly force against President Trump and his Secret Service security detail during the DOJ raid on Mar-a-Lago. Julie Kelly has the DETAILS HERE.
I am not surprised in the least. Remember, the objective of the FBI raid was to re-secure the physical evidence that President Trump had, which demonstrated how the DOJ and FBI action in 2016 was targeting him, using the power of their law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
The origination of all the DOJ/FBI/IC issues goes back to the ’15/’16 FBI exploitation of the NSA database; this is not a contested discussion issue – it’s just continually forgotten.
The raid on Mar-a-Lago, just like the Robert Mueller investigation, was part of the long standing coverup operation.
The FBI was looking for what Trump took with him as evidence of the weaponized system that targeted him. The FBI wanted that back. The FBI was willing to use deadly force to get it back, if that’s what it took.
Yes, apparently the FBI was prepared to engage in a gun battle or kill people in Mar-a-Lago, in order to retake the evidence against them.
I know it sounds scary, but that’s the reality of our modern FBI. These are not good people. Remember also that AG Merrick Garland said he authorized every facet of the raid.
More at: www.foxnews.com...
The federal judge presiding over former President Trump's Florida case has paused several court deadlines to consider presidential immunity.
Trump's legal team presented a motion Friday seeking "a partial stay of further proceedings" in the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith "until President Trump's motions based on Presidential immunity and the Appointments and Appropriations Clauses are resolved."
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Saturday agreed to hear arguments, allowing two weeks for both camps to prepare briefs regarding the relevance of the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity.