It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Okay you keep repeating this.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Vermilion
Netanyahu is a sadistic stupid man for going after fighters, while ignoring the men who fund and supply the fighters.
originally posted by: gortex
in case you haven't hearn none of the rockets made it to their destination but at least 45 people were killed in Rafah by Israel's response
originally posted by: WeMustCare
Netanyahu is a sadistic stupid man for going after fighters, while ignoring the men who fund and supply the fighters.
Sounds like more human shields for hamas, doesn’t it?
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Sounds like more human shields for hamas, doesn’t it?
Sounds more like Israel doing what they do.
Zionist cheer leaders will of course cheer.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Lazy88
It's also a fact Israel uses Human shields and is a brutal regime that kills Palestine in Gaza.
So where does that leave us.
This article is more than 18 years old
Israeli high court bans military use of Palestinians as human shields
www.theguardian.com...
This article is more than 18 years old
Israeli high court bans military use of Palestinians as human shields
A Palestinian shop-owner in the occupied West Bank was used as a human shield by Israeli forces after they raided his mobile phone store.
You’re equating this to cowering under hospitals hiding munitions in schools?
With two solders flanked wide left?
Give me a break, you’re not even making sense. Israel told them to evacuate because wait for it…….. they’re going to be invading rafah where there is 4 battalions and as a couple of days ago where hamas was once again launching bombs/rockets into Israel. Anyone stupid enough to hang around and wait to see what happens is well…exactly that, stupid. OR…is Hamas keeping them there for shields? 🤷♂️
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Sounds like more human shields for hamas, doesn’t it?
Sounds more like Israel doing what they do.
Zionist cheer leaders will of course cheer.
Give me a break, you’re not even making sense.
Israel told them to evacuate because wait for it…….. they’re going to be invading rafah where there is 4 battalions and as a couple of days ago where hamas was once again launching bombs/rockets into Israel.
Parties to a non-international armed conflictmay not order the displacement of the civilian population, in whole or in part, for reasons related to the conflict, unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand
ihl-databases.icrc.org...
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Displacement of a population is a war crime
originally posted by: gortex
The only threat to the Palestinians in Rafah is the IDF
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: KrustyKrab
Give me a break, you’re not even making sense.
Then you say...
Israel told them to evacuate because wait for it…….. they’re going to be invading rafah where there is 4 battalions and as a couple of days ago where hamas was once again launching bombs/rockets into Israel.
And you think I'm not making sense ?
Where does a starving population move to in a war zone when most of their places to go have been flattened , no food , no water , no shelter ... talk about not making sense !
Displacement of a population is a war crime
Parties to a non-international armed conflictmay not order the displacement of the civilian population, in whole or in part, for reasons related to the conflict, unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand
ihl-databases.icrc.org...
The only threat to the Palestinians in Rafah is the IDF , that is where they were told to go ordering them out is not allowed.
unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand
Rule 129. A. Parties to an international armed conflict may not deport or forcibly transfer the civilian population of an occupied territory, in whole or in part, unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand. B. Parties to a non-international armed conflict may not order the displacement of the civilian population, in whole or in part, for reasons related to the conflict, unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand