Daily Show Monologue 12-3-2024

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: nugget1

You must have missed my point Nug. You said that Trump could not become a dictator because two political parties stand in the way of that. Right, you said that, right? I then pointed out that one of those two parties has already knuckled down to trump and become the party of Trump? Right? Didn't I say that? I then pointed to the Democrats and said that they are so weak and fragmented that they could NOT stand up to him being a dictator should he want to be. Did you miss that as it sounds as if you did from your reply.

Gottcha! Sorry for by befuddled confusion and poorly worded thought process.

In order to have a dictatorship, DC has to be complicit. Trump was not allowed to become a dictator, yet Biden has is the point as I see it.

Without the swamp, Biden could never have gotten away with dragging the country down as far as he has. Because of the swamp, Trump was not allowed to enact any cleanup measures, lest he become a dictator.

I'll try to make more sense going forward; no promises, though.

That makes total sense and I would like to borrow it later.... I will not take credit.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: nugget1

You must have missed my point Nug. You said that Trump could not become a dictator because two political parties stand in the way of that. Right, you said that, right? I then pointed out that one of those two parties has already knuckled down to trump and become the party of Trump? Right? Didn't I say that? I then pointed to the Democrats and said that they are so weak and fragmented that they could NOT stand up to him being a dictator should he want to be. Did you miss that as it sounds as if you did from your reply.

Gottcha! Sorry for by befuddled confusion and poorly worded thought process.

In order to have a dictatorship, DC has to be complicit. Trump was not allowed to become a dictator, yet Biden has is the point as I see it.

Without the swamp, Biden could never have gotten away with dragging the country down as far as he has. Because of the swamp, Trump was not allowed to enact any cleanup measures, lest he become a dictator.

I'll try to make more sense going forward; no promises, though.

That makes total sense and I would like to borrow it later.... I will not take credit.

My thoughts aren't ego-driven, so no credit necessary; if you find them worthy of consideration feel free to use them.

a reply to: watchitburn

You don't think a young woman getting murdered by an illegal alien, that was met at the border and allowed in anyway, arrested twice and released in 2 different states before murdering the girl isn't chaos?

She's not the only victim of the border.

So is the Kappa rich girl, 'Molly,' whose supplier went to a cheaper source.

It's chaos in the way soft-on-crime cities, like The People's Communist Republic of Gay Pelosistan, reap the rewards.

They could have elected a tough on crime DA like we did, but you get what you get with liberal law and order strategy.

Like SF, America's border is getting what it gets with Joe's SF style strategies.

Chaos though?

What about very stupid policy leading to an uptick in crime related to that stupidity?

Chaos is a term that seeks to radicalize me that this problem is a "sky is falling" epidemic, when the reality says its mostly an overloaded system forced to process too much amnesty because the weak border policy is globally exploited under Biden. Examples of excess criminality are falsely used to overhype the damage. Try to get me to think nothing but mules and terrorists are streaming across.

www.pnas.org...

Relative to undocumented immigrants, US-born citizens are over 2 times more likely to be arrested for violent crimes, 2.5 times more likely to be arrested for drug crimes, and over 4 times more likely to be arrested for property crimes.

In my mind, drugs are still the most damaging thing that comes across.

Fentanyl is interesting, It's so potent the massive supplies found needed far less mules to get in. So while it's a major problem, I think there is perspective missed there, especially on how it gets in to begin with. Largely hidden within agricultural shippements through the teeth of security at Otay Mesa, in the middle of peak commercial crossing hours.

I feel like I'm being TOLD to primarily focus on Fentanyl and illegal killers, and then think it's beyond this point of total breakdown. I feel it manipulates me and tries to play my emotions to hold a bias or sensationalized opinion..

And the thing I hate most, is any form of psychological manipulation from unknowns that want to use my sentiment for their ends.

To me, our enemy is the corruption of Mexico that fosters an environment where Cartel adjacent individuals can own Futbol teams and casinos. And be such a driver of local economy, and so entrenched in culture, they have the organization and means to still poison Americans with Fentanyl and laugh at any wall put up.

To secure the border is to secure Mexico from The Cartel, which is way easier said. They'll kill anyone to prevent losing their influence. Like Boeing! J/K, but maybe not.

To secure the border also needs a digital upgrade. F* these expensive material building contracts and increase technology assisted patrols. Use all the crap they do at Area 51. Use thermal imaging more. Digital wall is cheaper by mile now, I guarentee. Set up a network to detect body heat signatures at key areas and mobilize in response to active incursions. Invest in seismic sensors that can detect tunneling in progress as it happens.

It's this stupid inside the box physical wall of bust approach that bugs me. A wall helps in places, but might ultimately send backpackers through the cloud shrouded mountains (where a wall is almost impossible) like they do anyway.

Agreed. We need take a right with border policy. But I'm not jumping on this sensationalized narrative of chaos about it.

originally posted by: Degradation33

It's getting harder to tell myself Trump says this crap to shake things up. Although he could have phrased "dozens of executive orders" differently than "dictator for a day," it's almost like I should believe it's not metaphorical, and he thinks he can be Putin.

The devil you know must apply all around.

I'll withhold my initial responses and get vehemently disagreed with for a bit.

One thing we have is a historical reference to look at with Trump. We all know that Trump says very unpolitical statements. I call it coming off the top rope for shock with a statement and then backing off to negotiate.

Because he does this all the time why do people seem to always fall for some over the top statement from him.

In the mean time Biden can say something controversial and those same people who freak out over what Trump says don’t give Biden’s statement a second thought.

originally posted by: Disgusted123

So please, stop with the fake outrage. DO SOMETHING, or it's time to shut up.

We are, it is called voting Trump back in to finish what the liberals fought him over for his first four years. Republicans are also sending these illegals to liberal cities since they seem to want them.

a reply to: crayzeed

The first question to ask is can you use deadly force to protect property? Yes you can with a small caveat that at anytime you feel a threat to one self too.

Someone shoplifts and you try to stop them and they then attack you, at that point you can shoot them.

There are a lot of different scenarios as in someone breaks into your house you can shoot them without direct engagement.

Trump is just hitting on a problem the liberals have recently created with massive open brazen theft that is forcing stores to close their doors in high risk areas.

originally posted by: Disgusted123
All I hear from Republicans is "immigrants, immigrants, immigrants".

And Republicans have done what so far?

Yup. Put it off till next year.

So please, stop with the fake outrage. DO SOMETHING, or it's time to shut up.

a reply to: Astrocometus

For the first 3 years, Biden said the border was secure.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
That is a fools bet, but I guess that it is and will be not our fault.

I get tied of the whole OMG! Statements about Trump.
We already know how Trump operates and to play some stupid “the end of Democracy” game is really boring now.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

For the first 3 years, Biden said the border was secure.

I would say 7.5 years. It is interesting that Obama was very heavy handed about the border and they seem to have forgotten it all to include what speeches Biden made back then too.

a reply to: nugget1


There we go, now I think we are on the same page, at least enough to be in the same book. When the Republican debates began I marveled at Trump thinking now that is what is needed, somebody to stand up and call out that fine group of business as usual Republicans. I had just shortly before that changed my registration from R to D so that I could vote in the primaries against 'Clinton and at that time likely for Sanders because at least, message aside, he was doing the same thing, calling out the business as usual Democrats.

So, Biden the dictator. Yeah I can understand that view point. The swamp that he rules, I can see that as well. That swamp though, what is it. As I see it it is at least eighty years old having come into focus around the end of ww2. Breton Woods and the system of free trade established on the back of US military might that enforces it. That dance has gotten us to where we are today. That ''swamp'' is the mire that holds our modern civilization together. With the US on the top of the pile I might add.

This is the swamp that Trump promised to drain, any lesser swamp, say the liberal bureaucrats in DC and to my perspective would have been nothing more than window dressing. Yet Trump promised drain the swamp and could not even manage to do that. He picked from that swamp his circle of advisors and cabinet rather than his circle of ''the best people'' he promised he knew. Rance Priebus as chief of staff for heaven's sake, a Republican swamp lackey of the first order. No, it became clear to me early on that his definition of the swamp was only a shallow pool compared to the real swamp as I have come to understand it. And of course, that swamp is out to sink him.

Biden as dictator, again yeah, I can see that but as a firmer hand of that new world order which as I see it is not so new after all. To me, believing that this NWO is coming is naive as it has been here since BW. But the world now is much more complicated and complex then it was eighty years ago and those accords are no longer up to managing the system that was put in place back then.

a reply to: Xtrozero

We already know how Trump operates

As i see it you clearly don't. You appear to take him at face value,trusting he has no other motives than the ones he presents to his followers. I see it all as a charade and have said so from the start.

No disagreement here. In fact, if you could post his monologue weekly, that would be greatly appreciated.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof

As i see it you clearly don't. You appear to take him at face value,trusting he has no other motives than the ones he presents to his followers. I see it all as a charade and have said so from the start.

Can you point to something he did during his first 4 years that wasn't directly out of his campaign promises? If you want to look at loss liberties just look to Biden. Holy crap we can go one by one. We also can look at Obama, both did so much wrong and you are worried about Trump.

I hate to break it to you, but they all live in a world of charades. Trump is not politician enough to hide his. He will do his 4 years, the country will be better than under Biden and we will all move on as both Trump and Biden die.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof

Biden as dictator, again yeah, I can see that but as a firmer hand of that new world order which as I see it is not so new after all. To me, believing that this NWO is coming is naive as it has been here since BW. But the world now is much more complicated and complex then it was eighty years ago and those accords are no longer up to managing the system that was put in place back then.

We use too many labels in ways that make no sense to their true meaning, and we use them as slurs that desensitize what really makes these words bad, and on many levels horrendous.

a reply to: Xtrozero

I like it when we agree on some things X.

a reply to: Degradation33

That's a whole lot of words and blustering when you could have just said that you agree the border needs to be secured.

originally posted by: TaupinDesciple
No disagreement here. In fact, if you could post his monologue weekly, that would be greatly appreciated.

Not on a new thread. Only need one. I'll post them here though.

Here's the latest one:

Daily Show Takes on Pride Month and multinational corporations. This is a good one.



This does a fair degree of LGBT damage control.

originally posted by: Disgusted123
All I hear from Republicans is "immigrants, immigrants, immigrants".

And Republicans have done what so far?

Yup. Put it off till next year.

So please, stop with the fake outrage. DO SOMETHING, or it's time to shut up.

a reply to: Astrocometus

what's HR2?