President TRUMP Authorized Ten Thousand Troops to Protect the Capitol - DJT is Totally Exonerated.

WOW! what a video. and they still got away with it.

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: dragonridr

He wasn't completely innocent either. He did try to get a group of alternate electors approved by state houses. They all refused the white house request and Biden kept his electors in the electorial college. When he saw that his alternate electors couldn't vote he tries to get Mike Pence to recognize Trumps new electors he refused to do so and Biden electors where certified.

What a lot of people fail to realize about January 6th is that, 6 swing States were planning on contesting their electors and submitting evidence of election irregularities, malfeasance, and fraud, that would have triggered two hours of debate for each contest, in an effort to convince Pence to put a short hold on certifying the election, so these States could further investigate the evidence and resolve their issues.

Arizona was successful in contesting their electors, and both chambers went into debate, shortly before the breach.

You can watch Arizona contest their electors and some of the debate that follows, starting around the 15:00 minute mark.

If you have States that want to contest their electors because they weren't chosen lawfully, or for other reasons, it makes sense to have alternate electors at the ready.

More exoneration for President Trump today.

gettr.com...

Expunging his impeachments from the record will be a top priority, relatively soon.

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: WeMustCare

Exculpatory evidence.

We all knew it was Nasty Nancy Plastic Pelosi, who orchestrated the whole J6 bs with their own "coup d'état".

Also for the record, President Trump was still the sitting President during the speech. A President can not commit an insurrection, because he's the President.

Democrats committed an false flag insurrection, as cover for their Coup D'état!

Learn how words are Weaponized.

Based on what we're hearing, Donald Trump has all the dirt on Nancy Pelosi. Supplied by his intelligence services, while he was president..up until the very last hour.

Which is why he is not attacking her in any way shape or form, during his presidential run.

a reply to: xuenchen

Bozo the clown was funnier.

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: WeMustCare

Exculpatory evidence.

We all knew it was Nasty Nancy Plastic Pelosi, who orchestrated the whole J6 bs with their own "coup d'état".

Also for the record, President Trump was still the sitting President during the speech. A President can not commit an insurrection, because he's the President.

Democrats committed an false flag insurrection, as cover for their Coup D'état!

Learn how words are Weaponized.

Based on what we're hearing, Donald Trump has all the dirt on Nancy Pelosi. Supplied by his intelligence services, while he was president..up until the very last hour.

Which is why he is not attacking her in any way shape or form, during his presidential run.

That reminds me of this video:

According to General McInerney Special Forces took Nancy Pelosi's laptop on January 6, 2021 Trump

And here's a longer version:

General McInerney says "I've seen the laptop" - Ann Vandersteel on steeltruth.com

a reply to: IndieA

Excellent find!

Also, The Republican committee has found More evidence Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff, and the J6 committee thought they had deleted... where President Trump's secret server driver says the president did not try to strangle him and take the limousine to the capitol, like Cassidy Hutchinson testified when she lied before Congress.

gettr.com...

a reply to: IndieA

Soooo.... what's the plan? Wait until he's in office so it becomes perfectly obvious that he was orchestrating her retirement as a political rival while crusading against the fascist oligarchy for orchestrating his retirement as a political rival? Or is that just me being cynical?

a reply to: IndieA

They never talk about this. 1/6 was all a distraction for this not to be discussed. Fake Electors. Insurrections. All sounds real good but what is happening now is why they wanted to push these trials through faster.

How many times, with Trump, has it been stated he 'did something to end his career' and then a few years later it is "trump was right".

The country right now is a perfect example. The world to be honest.

The floodgates are open because the media and the DOJ cannot suppress it all anymore.

The Democrats did the same thing in 2016 election. The difference is they had NO Senators backing them.

Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) objected to Alabama's votes.
Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) objected to Florida's votes.
Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) objected to Georgia's votes.
Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) objected to North Carolina's votes.
Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) objected to the votes from North Carolina in addition to votes from South Carolina and Wisconsin. She also stood up and objected citing "massive voter suppression" after Mississippi's votes were announced.
Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) brought up allegations of Russian interference in the election and malfunctioning voting machines when she objected following the announcement of Michigan's votes.
Maxine Waters (D-Calif) rose and said, "I do not wish to debate. I wish to ask 'Is there one United States senator who will join me in this letter of objection?'" after the announcement of Wyoming's votes.

All the usual suspects. In 2020 there was Senate backing. Then the "Insurrection" occurred....and it was all pushed through.

Mike Pence did the job he was asked to do for the Progressives.

Quite the imagination you have there fella. QQ for you. Why did the Biden administration sue Texas. I would think stopping the flow of illegal aliens from entering the country would be a good thing. Not so good for the communist party in power, eh? Snicker.

originally posted by: network dude

this is a great place to drop this.


eta:
if you have not watched this, it's incredibly important to the topic. You can hate Tucker with all your might, and still understand what Steve Sund has to say about the events or Jan 6, as he was in charge of Capitol Police that day, and was fired quickly for some reason.

I don't personally care for Carlson. Could never stand him when he was on Fox. But this interview is quite important not because of Carlson but the man he's interviewing, and because no one else would do this interview and get some of this information out to the public.

Most of it is publicly available and verifiable but no one is paying attention to it, and it's certainly not being brought to the public's attention by legacy media.

a reply to: Boomer1947

Great make believe scenario. Planned to use 10,000 national guardsmen to perform a coup? Lol

The mental gymnastics are kinda creative not gonna lie.

Then u end with the whole, watched it on Fox and threw ketchup on the wall lmfao....never thought people on ATS would be so susceptible to being gaslit this hard

a reply to: Boomer1947

I wish the 10,000 troops could have been there to maybe intimidate Mr. Mike Pence into actually doing HIS constitutional duty correctly ... the traitor!

Too bad for that absence....

Additional Donald J. Trump EXONERATION!

Will anyone willing to back up Cassidy Hutchinson’s version of events please stand up?

Hutchinson, in case you’ve forgotten, is the former aide to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows who was a surprise witness before the House Democrats’ Jan. 6 kangaroo committee.

In her testimony, she insisted she had heard from someone else at the White House that on Jan. 6, 2021, then-President Donald Trump had tried to grab the wheel of his limousine to go to the Capitol during the incursion.

BUT THE DRIVER TESTIFIED...

“The president was insistent on going to the Capitol,” testified the Secret Service driver, whose name was not released. However, Engel made it plain to Trump that, given no plan for his security was in place, that was impossible.

“It was clear to me he wanted to go to the Capitol. He was not screaming at Mr. Engel,” the driver said.

“He was not screaming at me. Certainly, his voice was raised, but it did not seem to me that he was irate — certainly not, certainly didn’t seem as irritated or agitated as he had on the way to the Ellipse,” the driver added.

As for the alleged lunge for the steering wheel? Yeah, that didn’t happen, said the driver — who was in a position to know about a thing like that.

More at: www.westernjournal.com...

CASSIDY Hutchinson is attempting to rush out a book she's writing, before everyone learns she full of SH'IT and only testified (lied) against President Trump because Liz Cheney/Adam Schiff paid her legal bills, in return for her LIES.

THESE SCUM WILL ALL PAY DEARLY FOR THEIR TREASON and their COVERUP.. IN 2025, or sooner. 😈

Secret service notified Trump prohibited items in Jan. 6 rally crowd


Trump was informed of prohibited items in Jan. 6 rally crowd, his driver testified

The head of Donald Trump’s Secret Service detail informed an agitated president on Jan. 6, 2021, that large groups of people had been denied entry to his rally that day because they were carrying prohibited items, the driver of his presidential SUV told congressional investigators, according to a transcript

The testimony is further evidence that Trump was aware of potential security risks in the crowd, even before the mob had breached the Capitol.

The driver told lawmakers that Trump pressed Engel for information about why large swaths of the crowd were not permitted past security magnetometers. Engel responded, according to the driver, by indicating that they had been stopped because they were carrying unspecified items that were prohibited past the security checkpoint.

The driver’s account adds to the body of evidence that captures Trump’s state of mind on Jan. 6, a key aspect of the ongoing federal prosecution of the former president for attempting to subvert the election. Special counsel Jack Smith is attempting to prove that Trump was aware that the crowd he called to Washington presented a danger to the transfer of power, even as he made public statements that initially inflamed the crowd further.

Investigators have contended Trump’s tweet was a trigger for some of the worst moments of violence that day.

Text

she overheard Trump, on the sidelines of his rally, concerned that his crowd looked too small and worrying that the magnetometers were keeping people out. “I overheard the president say something to the effect of … ‘They’re not here to hurt me. Take the F’ing mags away. Let my people in,’” Hutchinson told the panel. “‘They can march to the Capitol from here. Let the people in. Take the F’ing mags away.’”

a reply to: WeMustCare

Interesting, because she stated that's what Ornato told her and Ornato has never once stated that he didn't tell her that, not publicly, or in testimony.

Seems like Ornato could have cleared that up right after she testified he told her. Meadows has never stated or testified that anything she testified to was incorrect or a lie either.

The committee did mention they had some conflicting testimony by SS agents and welcomed them back to discuss further, but none did. They also were seeking the SS texts from that day, but alas they were all deleted and unrecoverable.

a reply to: frogs453

nobody has stated that Joe Biden didn't molest his daughter. So based on your logic, He's a rapist and child molester.

Pedo Pete. Well done with the logic!

a reply to: network dude

What the heck was that reach? They have conflicting testimony. The only person that can clear that up is Ornato, as Hutchinson stated he told her that.

He has not disputed her testimony.
You would think if she lied, he would want to call out her perjury. He has not.

a reply to: frogs453

reach? We have the daughters words, a plethora of video evidence of a sick twisted mind, and as you to diligently pointed out, since nobody refuted it, it must be factual. Or is it (D)ifferent depending on who you are trying to hang?