ONCE AGAIN, Democrats say the First Amendment is "not absolute"

Public verses School Libraries are different for me.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Justoneman

Then you do agree with the banning of certain books in public libraries, the banning of drag shows, and the banning of revenge porn and banning of pornography in public and or the banning of Critical Race Theory and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, or anything some of the local folks find repulsive, offensive or inciteful? You don't agree that the 1st Amendment is absolute and you think it must be regulated, on behalf of the children of course.

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger2

If you control what people say, you can control how people think.

Look at illegal aliens. . . to illegal migrants. . . to migrants. . . to newcomers. . . .

Bad example.

Aliens? Really?
It was the wrong word in the first place. Migrants is the correct one.

Can you find me the percentage of US citizens with grand, grand grand, grand grand grand and so on fathers and mothers who haven't come from somewhere else.

See? I was right.

You want call migrants as aliens.
It was the wrong word to be used and as time passes it has taken another meaning with the evolution of the language.

I am sure you have been watching the X-Files and you know better.

No.

Legal migrants are just migrants.

Illegal aliens are, illegal aliens.

Once again, we see the left trying to determine how people should be speaking.

You've proven my point once again.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Infringing on someone else's rights, isn't a right.

Like voting on a woman's right to her body?

My only concern is the body of the unborn child. Not the woman's.

It's not your business.

Unless its your body.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Infringing on someone else's rights, isn't a right.

Like voting on a woman's right to her body?

My only concern is the body of the unborn child. Not the woman's.

It's not your business.

Unless its your body.

So people shouldn't be against slavery unless they are slaves.

How odd.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger2

If you control what people say, you can control how people think.

Look at illegal aliens. . . to illegal migrants. . . to migrants. . . to newcomers. . . .

Bad example.

Aliens? Really?
It was the wrong word in the first place. Migrants is the correct one.

Can you find me the percentage of US citizens with grand, grand grand, grand grand grand and so on fathers and mothers who haven't come from somewhere else.

See? I was right.

You want call migrants as aliens.
It was the wrong word to be used and as time passes it has taken another meaning with the evolution of the language.

I am sure you have been watching the X-Files and you know better.

No.

Legal migrants are just migrants.

Illegal aliens are, illegal aliens.

Once again, we see the left trying to determine how people should be speaking.

You've proven my point once again.

You have a strange view on what proof means but anyway.

Aliens refers to something else in our times.
(You should watch the X-Files if you haven't)

There are legal and illegal migrants according to the law.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Infringing on someone else's rights, isn't a right.

Like voting on a woman's right to her body?

My only concern is the body of the unborn child. Not the woman's.

It's not your business.

Unless its your body.

So people shouldn't be against slavery unless they are slaves.

How odd.

Very unfortunate parallel

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Infringing on someone else's rights, isn't a right.

Like voting on a woman's right to her body?

My only concern is the body of the unborn child. Not the woman's.

It's not your business.

Unless its your body.

So people shouldn't be against slavery unless they are slaves.

How odd.

That's a "reach".

Not a good one.

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger2

If you control what people say, you can control how people think.

Look at illegal aliens. . . to illegal migrants. . . to migrants. . . to newcomers. . . .

Bad example.

Aliens? Really?
It was the wrong word in the first place. Migrants is the correct one.

Can you find me the percentage of US citizens with grand, grand grand, grand grand grand and so on fathers and mothers who haven't come from somewhere else.

See? I was right.

You want call migrants as aliens.
It was the wrong word to be used and as time passes it has taken another meaning with the evolution of the language.

I am sure you have been watching the X-Files and you know better.

True, the language is evolving, but the "evolution" is different with the left. Their "language evolution" involves obscuring the truth. 'Lying" has evolved into 'mis-speaking'. 'Plagiarism' has evolved into 'duplicated speech'. A doctor blocking someone's puberty, chemically castrating them, and mutilating their body is 'gender affirming healthcare'.

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger2

If you control what people say, you can control how people think.

Look at illegal aliens. . . to illegal migrants. . . to migrants. . . to newcomers. . . .

Bad example.

Aliens? Really?
It was the wrong word in the first place. Migrants is the correct one.

Can you find me the percentage of US citizens with grand, grand grand, grand grand grand and so on fathers and mothers who haven't come from somewhere else.

See? I was right.

You want call migrants as aliens.
It was the wrong word to be used and as time passes it has taken another meaning with the evolution of the language.

I am sure you have been watching the X-Files and you know better.

No.

Legal migrants are just migrants.

Illegal aliens are, illegal aliens.

Once again, we see the left trying to determine how people should be speaking.

You've proven my point once again.

You have a strange view on what proof means but anyway.

Aliens refers to something else in our times.
(You should watch the X-Files if you haven't)

There are legal and illegal migrants according to the law.

There are migrants and illegal aliens.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Infringing on someone else's rights, isn't a right.

Like voting on a woman's right to her body?

My only concern is the body of the unborn child. Not the woman's.

It's not your business.

Unless its your body.

So people shouldn't be against slavery unless they are slaves.

How odd.

That's a "reach".

Not a good one.

Nope.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Infringing on someone else's rights, isn't a right.

Like voting on a woman's right to her body?

My only concern is the body of the unborn child. Not the woman's.

It's not your business.

Unless its your body.

So people shouldn't be against slavery unless they are slaves.

How odd.

That's a "reach".

Not a good one.

Nope.

You get someone else to agree with that comparison then.

Cuz it makes no sense.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Infringing on someone else's rights, isn't a right.

Like voting on a woman's right to her body?

My only concern is the body of the unborn child. Not the woman's.

It's not your business.

Unless its your body.

So people shouldn't be against slavery unless they are slaves.

How odd.

That's a "reach".

Not a good one.

Nope.

You get someone else to agree with that comparison then.

Cuz it makes no sense.

I can't have an opinion and voice it because. . . "it's not my body".

That's what you said.

Well, have you ever been a slave? If not, then why have an opinion about the rights of someone else's body?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger2

If you control what people say, you can control how people think.

Look at illegal aliens. . . to illegal migrants. . . to migrants. . . to newcomers. . . .

Bad example.

Aliens? Really?
It was the wrong word in the first place. Migrants is the correct one.

Can you find me the percentage of US citizens with grand, grand grand, grand grand grand and so on fathers and mothers who haven't come from somewhere else.

See? I was right.

You want call migrants as aliens.
It was the wrong word to be used and as time passes it has taken another meaning with the evolution of the language.

I am sure you have been watching the X-Files and you know better.

No.

Legal migrants are just migrants.

Illegal aliens are, illegal aliens.

Once again, we see the left trying to determine how people should be speaking.

You've proven my point once again.

You have a strange view on what proof means but anyway.

Aliens refers to something else in our times.
(You should watch the X-Files if you haven't)

There are legal and illegal migrants according to the law.

There are migrants and illegal aliens.

I think I have an equitable compromise - how about

"Undocumented lawbreakers"?

a reply to: Venkuish1

Aliens refers to something else in our times. (You should watch the X-Files if you haven't) There are legal and illegal migrants according to the law.

well not exactly in this instance.

from websters,

alien 1 of 3 adjective
ˈā-lē-ən ˈāl-yən Synonyms of alien
1 a : belonging or relating to another person, place, or thing : strange an alien environment
b : relating, belonging, or owing allegiance to another country or government : foreign alien residents
c : exotic sense 1 alien plants
d : coming from another world : extraterrestrial alien beings an alien spaceship When it comes to knowing what alien life forms might be like, we don't have any idea.— Kate Shuster

2: differing in nature or character typically to the point of incompatibility
ideas alien to democracy

alien 2 of 3 noun
1 a : a person who is not of a particular group or place aliens seeking asylum in the U.S. In this way it came to pass that those scattered linen-weavers—emigrants from the town into the country—were to the last regarded as aliens by their rustic neighbours …— George Eliot … she whom we had deemed so … pious, at last died an alien from the church …— Delia Salter Bacon
b : a foreign-born resident who has not been naturalized and is still a subject or citizen of a foreign country broadly : a foreign-born citizen
2 : extraterrestrial a movie about an invasion of Earth by monstrous aliens
3 : exotic sense 1 Russian thistle, kudzu, and other aliens
alien 1 of 3

just because you want to change how people are identified as, doesn't make what they were originally Id'd as wrong. feelz has nothing to do with that.

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger2

If you control what people say, you can control how people think.

Look at illegal aliens. . . to illegal migrants. . . to migrants. . . to newcomers. . . .

Bad example.

Aliens? Really?
It was the wrong word in the first place. Migrants is the correct one.

Can you find me the percentage of US citizens with grand, grand grand, grand grand grand and so on fathers and mothers who haven't come from somewhere else.

See? I was right.

You want call migrants as aliens.
It was the wrong word to be used and as time passes it has taken another meaning with the evolution of the language.

I am sure you have been watching the X-Files and you know better.

No.

Legal migrants are just migrants.

Illegal aliens are, illegal aliens.

Once again, we see the left trying to determine how people should be speaking.

You've proven my point once again.

You have a strange view on what proof means but anyway.

Aliens refers to something else in our times.
(You should watch the X-Files if you haven't)

There are legal and illegal migrants according to the law.

There are migrants and illegal aliens.

I think I have an equitable compromise - how about

"Undocumented lawbreakers"?

Nope.

Illegal aliens.

Or, criminals if you prefer.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger2

If you control what people say, you can control how people think.

Look at illegal aliens. . . to illegal migrants. . . to migrants. . . to newcomers. . . .

Bad example.

Aliens? Really?
It was the wrong word in the first place. Migrants is the correct one.

Can you find me the percentage of US citizens with grand, grand grand, grand grand grand and so on fathers and mothers who haven't come from somewhere else.

See? I was right.

You want call migrants as aliens.
It was the wrong word to be used and as time passes it has taken another meaning with the evolution of the language.

I am sure you have been watching the X-Files and you know better.

No.

Legal migrants are just migrants.

Illegal aliens are, illegal aliens.

Once again, we see the left trying to determine how people should be speaking.

You've proven my point once again.

You have a strange view on what proof means but anyway.

Aliens refers to something else in our times.
(You should watch the X-Files if you haven't)

There are legal and illegal migrants according to the law.

There are migrants and illegal aliens.

I think I have an equitable compromise - how about

"Undocumented lawbreakers"?

Nope.

Illegal aliens.

Or, criminals if you prefer.

Agreed. Much more accurate and concise, which seems to be an alien concept to the left.

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Venkuish1

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger2

If you control what people say, you can control how people think.

Look at illegal aliens. . . to illegal migrants. . . to migrants. . . to newcomers. . . .

Bad example.

Aliens? Really?
It was the wrong word in the first place. Migrants is the correct one.

Can you find me the percentage of US citizens with grand, grand grand, grand grand grand and so on fathers and mothers who haven't come from somewhere else.

See? I was right.

You want call migrants as aliens.
It was the wrong word to be used and as time passes it has taken another meaning with the evolution of the language.

I am sure you have been watching the X-Files and you know better.

No.

Legal migrants are just migrants.

Illegal aliens are, illegal aliens.

Once again, we see the left trying to determine how people should be speaking.

You've proven my point once again.

You have a strange view on what proof means but anyway.

Aliens refers to something else in our times.
(You should watch the X-Files if you haven't)

There are legal and illegal migrants according to the law.

There are migrants and illegal aliens.

I think I have an equitable compromise - how about

"Undocumented lawbreakers"?

Nope.

Illegal aliens.

Or, criminals if you prefer.

Agreed. Much more accurate and concise, which seems to be an alien concept to the left.

Ba-dum-tssssssssss

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Infringing on someone else's rights, isn't a right.

Like voting on a woman's right to her body?

Infringing on an unborn living Human organism.

Unborn Living Human Organisms and Fetuses are not amputatable limbs or an appendix. ⚖️

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

I think you just made his case.

To the twisted leftist mind, yes. No matter what it is. Especially when there is an agenda behind it like frontloading smut materials in schools, "it's free speech"!

Well, no it isn't, it's a perverted agenda. All decent people who have a smidgeon of common decency know this.

originally posted by: TzarChasm
Until Congress agrees to modify the 1st amendment and define exactly what its limitations are and codify those limitations within the framing of the united states constitution, the 1st amendment is in fact absolute.

Truth!

It doesn't prevent them from trying to sue you in court, but any case like that should be immediately dismissed by a judge based on Constitutional grounds. The unfortunate thing is that there are judges that will attempt to allow these cases to go forward and it's then up to the defendant to get an appeals court to issue a ruling against it.

And if the appeals court doesn't do it, there's always SCOTUS.

And didn't we just see a 9-0 ruling in favor of existing Constitutional rights?