It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Lazy88
What's the olive branch offered for their benevolent act that resulted in nakba?
During the past three decades, Israel has made countless concessions to the Palestinians as part of an effort to advance peace and coexistence.
In 1993-95, Israel signed the Oslo Accords with the Palestinians, giving them full security and civilian control over large parts of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Thousands of PLO members stationed in various Arab countries were allowed to move to the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Israel released thousands of Palestinian security prisoners, including many who were involved in terrorist attacks against Israelis.
www.jns.org...#:~:text=During%20the%20past%20three%20decades,West%20Bank%20and%20Gaza%20Strip.
Israel’s concessions did not advance the peace process. Instead, they were seen by the Palestinians as a sign of weakness, prompting them to increase their terrorist attacks and incitement against Israel.
The Palestinians turned down two concrete Israeli offers of peace (at the Camp David summit in 2000 and from then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in 2008) that would have given them a state on most of the land of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and eastern Jerusalem.
www.jns.org...#:~:text=During%20the%20past%20three%20decades,West%20Bank%20and%20Gaza%20Strip.
At the Camp David summit, then U.S. President Bill Clinton presented the Israelis and Palestinians with an outline of the parameters for a final-status agreement that closely mirrored then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s proposal, which would have given the Palestinians 97% of the West Bank, full control of the Gaza Strip and large parts of eastern Jerusalem. Yasser Arafat, then leader of the PLO, rejected the offer, mainly because of a clause in the agreement specifying that the deal meant the end of the conflict. Dennis Ross, then U.S. Middle East envoy, who participated in the Camp David negotiations, said: “For him [Arafat] to end the conflict is to end himself.”
originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Lazy88
Kinda, it doesn't help that either part of the conflict don't really have a worldview where there is a place for others that don't share their world view.
They both belive in my way or the highway, and that's how you get conflicts....
Like I said, the propaganda goons are all over and when they fail to adress both mistakes you know what you're dealing with...
Reports of the outcome of the summit have been described as illustrating the Rashomon effect, in which the multiple witnesses gave contradictory and self-serving interpretations.
Which party (parties) should be blamed for the lack of success of the Summit is hotly debated. In a 2005 book published by Heribert Adam and Kogila Moodley, the authors state "Informed observer blamed all three parties’ negotiation strategies for the failure", referring to the Israeli, Palestinians and Americans.[17]
originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Lazy88
Are you really that biased that you can't see the heavy hand israel had in creating this generation spanning conflict?
originally posted by: deckard74
a reply to: ToneD
...
I mean, what exactly are they referring to as *God*, when they say they are chosen?
And, would this *God* really condone this kind of massacre? Scary, scary world we live in.
originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Lazy88
...
You seem to think one side is innocent, which is laughable!
... So thanks for playing and sorry for your waste of propaganda...
originally posted by: ToneD
Does not the military have direction,
orders, commands ?
On video, Israeli military spokesperson plays dumb,
has a convenient LACK of knowledge,
then makes
a lame excuse of a "possible mistake" -quote
REALLY ?
twitter.com...
Being this inept, I wouldn't let them house sit a potted plant.
. . . vid worthy enough to share
_________________
originally posted by: oldhead1967
originally posted by: ToneD
Does not the military have direction,
orders, commands ?
On video, Israeli military spokesperson plays dumb,
has a convenient LACK of knowledge,
then makes
a lame excuse of a "possible mistake" -quote
REALLY ?
twitter.com...
Being this inept, I wouldn't let them house sit a potted plant.
. . . vid worthy enough to share
_________________
It’s just a bunch of theocratic racists who suckle off the teat of our tax money, expecting more sophisticated countries to fight their wars. Welfare queens who want to flex muscles but only really know how to kill defenseless children and aid workers. USA and UK bet on the wrong horse to hold their interests in the region, but thanks to corruption/extortion are bound to the zionist cause.