"Black day" for NATO equipment in Ukraine

Hello ATS!

Yesterday I reported on the first documentary evidence of the destruction of an Abrams tank in Ukraine near Avdeevka. Prior to this, Biden prohibited Zelensky from using the supplied Abrams to avoid reputational losses such as those suffered by the previously destroyed Leopards and Challengers. Abrams was hit by a kamikaze drone, and then finished off by Russian grenade launchers. Russian actor and priest Ivan Okhlobystin, who previously announced a bonus of 10 million rubles for each shot down Abrams, confirmed the payment of the bonus. The Russian Parliament is putting forward an initiative to install a damaged Abrams in Moscow opposite the US Embassy.



But during the night even more sensational news came. The destruction of two more Abrams, as well as an Armored Repair and Maintenance Vehicle based on the Abrams, is documented. Later, documented cases of the destruction of the Swedish Archer self-propelled gun, the French Caesar self-propelled gun and the Norwegian NASAMS air defense system also appeared. A few days ago, footage of the destruction of the American Patriot air defense system in the Kherson region was demonstrated. In total, 7 such complexes were delivered to Ukraine. 5 of them have already been destroyed.

Thank you.

I remember reading a while ago that the Americans told Ukraine not to put the abrams on the front line because it would show how easily they would be destroyed.

I guess the Ukrainians didn't listen.

a reply to: RussianTroll

I'd be surprised if they really do care. In a real conflict between Russia, NATO and the US, I doubt anyone would be worrying about tanks.

In reality it's all good business for the US MIC and all of the affiliated bodies. The gravy train rolls on!

At some point when the next theatre has been suitably primed this will all come to an end and some other perceived enemy will get it in the neck courtesy of Uncle Sam.

The US needs constant war and threat of war. It's the American way.

a reply to: RussianTroll

Russia has lost a lot of equipment too. These sort of things happen when military forces clash.

People die, stuff gets destroyed, in the end, it usually isn't worth the waste.

Hopefully, there will be regime change in Russia soon, when Putin passes. He reportedly has recently been treated for blood cancer, his eyesight is failing, and we could all see the Parkinsons in his recent interview with Tucker.

I see you have no links for any of your claims RT and just photos from your personal porn collection.

I wonder if Mad Vlad is going to pay the bonus of 10 million roubles for each Abrams he promised to hand out? He's got to get rid of those pesky roubles some how or will the soliders ask for American dollars or even Chinese yuen as a better investment!!!
I suppose you have to celebrated the tiny wins of destroying a tank or two compared to the massive loses of Russian military equpiment...

Things get destroyed in war, and a lot more Russian equipment has been smashed during Mad Vlads 'special operation' let alone the poor Russian soliders forced to fight in his name...

Hows the T14 doing theses days???

www.newsweek.com...

Russian Soldiers Rejecting T-14 Armata Battle Tanks Over Quality.

A program 11 years in the making, the development of the T-14 Armata was "dogged with delays, reduction in planned fleet size, and reports of manufacturing problems." A bigger and bulkier tank than others in Russia's possession, the T-14 Armata also poses logistical challenges.

Didn't Mad Vlad send it to the front and then had to quickly withdraw it, sounds like the same problem he has with his wife, a quick withdrawal??

a reply to: RussianTroll


All tanks can be destroyed , and it happens in war .

Where is the source claiming the other 2 Abrams destroyed ? or are you lying again ?

Btw , Russia has lost 8 SU-34 Fighter-Bombers in last 10 days


Ukraine Downs Another Russian Fighter-Bomber SU-34, 8th in Ten Days

a reply to: RussianTroll

Our resources are going to be burned up in this war and we'll have nothing left when the Russians invade another Country, i.e Poland! Then they'll just march across Europe knowing our Resources are near enough down to nothing.

This war is for that purpose I reckon... to dwindle the US and Britains resources to as low as possible. Maybe it's so that China can then attack other Countries and we'll have nothing to fight them with..

originally posted by: xWorldxGonexMadx
a reply to: RussianTroll

Our resources are going to be burned up in this war and we'll have nothing left when the Russians invade another Country, i.e Poland! Then they'll just march across Europe knowing our Resources are near enough down to nothing.

This war is for that purpose I reckon... to dwindle the US and Britains resources to as low as possible. Maybe it's so that China can then attack other Countries and we'll have nothing to fight them with..

The vast majority of kit sent is older equipment that was either in storage or being phased out. The abrams being an example.

One significant exception is artillery shells which resulted in a shortage, however as a direct result of Putins invasion production is being ramped up and NATO will be better prepared.

Russia on the other hand is having to use older and older equipment as they burn through their stocks.

originally posted by: xWorldxGonexMadx
a reply to: RussianTroll

Our resources are going to be burned up in this war and we'll have nothing left when the Russians invade another Country, i.e Poland! Then they'll just march across Europe knowing our Resources are near enough down to nothing.

This war is for that purpose I reckon... to dwindle the US and Britains resources to as low as possible. Maybe it's so that China can then attack other Countries and we'll have nothing to fight them with..

Mad Vlad thought his 'special operation' was going to be over in a few months, now 2 years later and a possible million deaths of Russian soliders, the impact of this war on Russia is a huge cost on it's military resources.

Is Russia still using those WW2 T54’s?

a reply to: RussianTroll

how many T-14's has russia deployed to Ukraine? oh that's right they did but held them back from the front line only used them for indirect fire and then pulled them out. seems they maybe no better than the rest of the 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 year old jack in the box junk that get blown to sh@@ and sold for scrap iron everyday in Ukraine.

Better for NATO equipment to get smashed as opposed to NATO troops. We will replace the equipment. You can count on it. Again, as a cold war era veteran, it's down right delightful to see Russians dying in a country they are invading. The USSR collapsed, maybe we will see the collapse of the new dictator too. Just keep making sure that you are bleeding out over there. It's very satisfying for me 👍

Cool a few more million American dollars burning in a field somewhere in eastern Ukraine along with a few hundred thousand Ukranians.

Best money we ever spent according to my government.

I'm so sick of this war and the idiots who's consent has been manufactured to support it. If you support Ukraine and/or Israel and support sending them billions then GET F***ed. You are part of the problem. You are the weak people making hard times. We should be using this money they print from thin air to rebuild our infrastructure and fight homelessness and hunger.

originally posted by: Vermilion

Is Russia still using those WW2 T54’s?

People like you are the people I'm referring in my my above post...

You are part of the problem sport.

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: Vermilion

Is Russia still using those WW2 T54’s?

People like you are the people I'm referring in my my above post...

You are part of the problem sport.

Russia using WW2 tanks and I’m the problem? 🤣👍
I know I’m posting in a troll thread but please go on, I’d love to see the mental gymnastics.

Facebook and Instagram are blocking videos of Abrams being destroyed.
Such freedom of speech in the communist West)))

originally posted by: vance2
Better for NATO equipment to get smashed as opposed to NATO troops. We will replace the equipment. You can count on it. Again, as a cold war era veteran, it's down right delightful to see Russians dying in a country they are invading. The USSR collapsed, maybe we will see the collapse of the new dictator too. Just keep making sure that you are bleeding out over there. It's very satisfying for me 👍

Delightful?

So you won't be offended to hear how wonderful it was to hear of the Americans dying in Iraq and Afghanistan, oh and why not Vietnam too?

a reply to: RussianTroll

That’s ok, there are more entertaining videos out there.
Like this one….
US-built Bradley vehicle obliterates ‘most advanced’ Russian tank touted by Putin in Ukraine
m.youtube.com...

T90 destroyed by a Bradley?
Say it ain’t so.
Embarrassing.
Maybe that’s why Russia is going with WW2 tech?

originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: RussianTroll

That’s ok, there are more entertaining videos out there.
Like this one….
US-built Bradley vehicle obliterates ‘most advanced’ Russian tank touted by Putin in Ukraine
m.youtube.com...

T90 destroyed by a Bradley?
Say it ain’t so.
Embarrassing.
Maybe that’s why Russia is going with WW2 tech?

Well, yes. This is a famous video. Only you were not shown its ending. All external sensors and guidance systems of the tank were cut off. There were two Bradleys, they fired from different positions. The tank returned home undamaged, recovered and returned to battle a couple of days later))))

a reply to: RussianTroll

Facebook and Instagram are blocking videos of Abrams being destroyed.
Such freedom of speech in the communist West)))

No, they're just blocking Mad Vlads propaganda and Russian bullsh*t