Trump Must Pay Half a Billion Dollars Before He Can Appeal New York Decision

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Hur said multiple times in his report that he had no evidence of intent and as a result could not show any law had been broken.

Neglect is intent.

But it's not needed as there are better examples, such as:

"Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,"

Is Biden above the law?

a reply to: JinMI

"Then perhaps you'll be ready for higher level discussions ..."

Oh, my!

Get over yourself?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

"Then perhaps you'll be ready for higher level discussions ..."

Oh, my!

Get over yourself?

You should feel lucky I count you among those with the ability....

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Hur said multiple times in his report that he had no evidence of intent and as a result could not show any law had been broken.

lol, Nope. The Primary reason no charges where brought against Biden is his mental cognitive state. He is incapable of standing trial.

a reply to: JinMI

Just more deflection I see.
I don't see us having a complete conversation when you have the feeling that a criminal is above the law when said individual is absolutely not.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Hur said multiple times in his report that he had no evidence of intent and as a result could not show any law had been broken.

Neglect is intent.

But it's not needed as there are better examples, such as:

"Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,"

Is Biden above the law?

This thread is about Trump. Not Biden so please keep up.

originally posted by: Allaroundya4k
a reply to: JinMI

Just more deflection I see.
I don't see us having a complete conversation when you have the feeling that a criminal is above the law when said individual is absolutely not.

I'm trying to find the standard you are applying as far as "criminal" and "above the law" as they are clearly in conflict with my understanding of the terms.

a reply to: JinMI

I'm truly blessed.

originally posted by: Allaroundya4k

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Hur said multiple times in his report that he had no evidence of intent and as a result could not show any law had been broken.

Neglect is intent.

But it's not needed as there are better examples, such as:

"Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,"

Is Biden above the law?

This thread is about Trump. Not Biden so please keep up.

Also you:

No one person is above the law.

Please...make it make sense...

a reply to: JinMI

Glad you admit your inability to fully understand the law.

originally posted by: Allaroundya4k
a reply to: JinMI

Glad you admit your inability to fully understand the law.

Still nothing?

K.

Carry on.

a reply to: JinMI


How is this a difficult concept for you to grasp?

originally posted by: Allaroundya4k
a reply to: JinMI


How is this a difficult concept for you to grasp?

Says the guy on many of my posts asking for me to dumb them down.....

Please.

a reply to: JinMI

So no answer?
Mostly I don't respond to things that don't matter to me.
But I will hop on threads when people say stupid thing's.....hint hint

a reply to: JinMI

Don't cast your pearls before swine Jin. It's not worth it.

a reply to: Klassified

Or how about...say things and back them up.
None of you have ever presented anything other then opinion pieces that only admit to crimes committed yet try to justify them.

a reply to: JinMI

A statement that Hur spends the rest of report refuting.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: JinMI

Don't cast your pearls before swine Jin. It's not worth it.

Say something meaningful perhaps.
You say many things and only use your emotions often.

a reply to: Kenzo

So If I file documents and say my house is worth 500k but my appraiser and the bank comes in at 450k.....That's fraud?

The only real estate fraud was the evaluation of MAL by a judge who used to drive a cab. Real qualified....

The banks even testified there was no fraud and that is who they are saying he duped.

How hard is this all to explain?

a reply to: matafuchs

Groundhog Day, again?!!!!