Trump Must Pay Half a Billion Dollars Before He Can Appeal New York Decision

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Vermilion

Most of the banks in New York already stopped doing business with Trump years ago. Deutsche Bank was pretty much the only one left willing to loan him money.

Do you really think their investors are going to be happy if they loan money to someone who just had a very public trial where it was revealed the perspective loanee cost Deutsche Bank millions of dollars in interest?

Judging by how they reacted and invest on a daily basis, there is no real fraud, and they'd prefer to continue business with Trump.
apnews.com...


I'd present more links if it wouldn't fall on deaf ears anyway.

a reply to: Threadbarer

It is not up to me. It is up to banks. If I was him I would not take a loan from anyone in NY. My point was the state of NY says he lies on loans, fines him half a billion and then rules he can still do business with a NY bank....

a reply to: matafuchs

Mr. Trump will wind up Paying a Small Fine to this Kangaroo Court and when he becomes President Again the State of NY will become his Bee Itch .


“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

“The Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause is an incorporated protection applicable to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause,” the Supreme Court found at the time.

“The prohibition embodied in the Excessive Fines Clause carries forward protections found in sources from Magna Carta to the English Bill of Rights to state constitutions from the colonial era to the present day,” Ginsburg argued in the case. “Protection against excessive fines has been a constant shield throughout Anglo-American history for good reason: Such fines undermine other liberties.”

“They can be used, e.g., to retaliate against or chill the speech of political enemies,” she observed.

" Despite threats from Democrat New York Attorney General Letitia James to seize entire skyscrapers owned by Trump if he fails to pay the fine, legal observers believe the Republican may be on solid ground in arguing that the mammoth judgment is a disproportionate punishment for a case where there is no victim of fraud."



trendingpoliticsnews.com...

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Leticia James tweeting Trumps debt interest is certainly evidence of violating the 8th amendment.
Who does that?
Has an AG ever done that?
Concerning.
twitter.com...

a reply to: Vermilion

It's BS. She is gloating and that is not her job. She better watch out or she will end up being sued.

a reply to: matafuchs

Trump supporters seem to like issuing threats?

Hunters doodles go for 500K But Trump gets charged for overvaluing assets .

Welcome to communism

a reply to: pennylane123

Go for?

Like what folk are willing to pay?

If they don't sell, they don't sell.

So, no comparison.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Another_Nut

Assuming a bank is willing to grant the loan. Something tells me there aren't a lot of banks chomping at the bit to loan half a billion dollars to someone so they can cover their court imposed punishment for lying to banks on loan applications.

He could always use say Mar a Lago as Collateral or one of his other Numerous Properties . Or how about he Purchases a Bank and Loans the Money to Himself ? ...........*)

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: pennylane123

Go for?

Like what folk are willing to pay?

If they don't sell, they don't sell.

So, no comparison.

So the banks were not willing to give Trump the loans?

Please explain.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: pennylane123

Go for?

Like what folk are willing to pay?

If they don't sell, they don't sell.

So, no comparison.

Do you think the people willing to pay 500K are buying art or access?

a reply to: pennylane123

Why should I?

I didn't say that.

Apples and oranges. And whataboutism.

a reply to: pennylane123

I neither know nor care?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: pennylane123

I neither know nor care?

But you are not stupid so I am pretty sure you have an idea.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: pennylane123

Why should I?

I didn't say that.

Apples and oranges. And whataboutism.

How is it different? Because you cant be right without sounding completely bias and hypocritical?

Its ok to be wrong . Its ok to have been wrong this whole time . Its a product of propaganda.

a reply to: pennylane123

No, I have no idea, nor do I care.

a reply to: pennylane123

If you say so.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

" I neither know "

Yep , that's about Right .

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Yes. It's what I said. I'm not obsessed or triggered by such things.

I'll leave that to you folks.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

That is not what I am talking about and again, where are they? E Carroll said it happened but she deleted the messages. Fannis Dad said someone spray painted her house but he cleaned it up for her before she saw it. The NASCAR noose Juicy Smollett.....plenty.

However, a State AG who gloats about a case like this is unethical and unprofessional.