It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: whyamIhere
I can’t stop thinking about a Simulation.
Why would we work every day for forty years.
Just to be too old to enjoy it.
Yet, we happily walk off to work.
At least five days a week.
Why do we accept this ?
originally posted by: Therealbeverage
originally posted by: whyamIhere
I can’t stop thinking about a Simulation.
Why would we work every day for forty years.
Just to be too old to enjoy it.
Yet, we happily walk off to work.
At least five days a week.
Why do we accept this ?
Now you have to ask yourself are you human?
originally posted by: whereislogic
It's almost over. This "system of things" is coming to a close. And with it, those who have allowed themselves to be played "by the ruler of this world" (John 12:31) and "god of this system of things" (2 Cor 4:4), completely oblivious to how they're being played or who is doing it, yet still allowing it (making that choice).
Until the late 19th or early 20th century, scientists were called "natural philosophers" or "men of science".
English philosopher and historian of science William Whewell coined the term scientist in 1833...
As soon as modern science was born in the 17th century, . . . Spectacular scientific breakthroughs enveloped science in a halo of infallibility and authority, producing scientism, a religion in itself, a sacred cow.
Anyone misled into believing pseudoscientific theories becomes a victim. . . .
This belief was intensified as scientific progress continued to erode the antiscientific attitude false religion had once fostered. Commerce and politics began recognizing science as a powerful tool to be used in achieving their goals, be it monetary reward or consolidation of political power.
Clearly stated, science was slowly developing into a god, giving rise to scientism. Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines this as “an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation.”
...
Knowledge (gno'sis) is put in a very favorable light in the Christian Greek Scriptures. However, not all that men may call “knowledge” is to be sought, because philosophies and views exist that are “falsely called ‘knowledge.’” (1Ti 6:20) ...
... Thus Paul wrote about some who were learning (taking in knowledge) “yet never able to come to an accurate knowledge [...] of truth.” (2Ti 3:6, 7)
...
How does God view the “wisdom” offered by human philosophy?
1 Cor. 1:19-25: “It is written: ‘I will make the wisdom of the wise men perish, and the intelligence of the intellectual men I will shove aside.’ Where is the wise man? Where the scribe? Where the debater of this system of things? Did not God make the wisdom of the world foolish? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom did not get to know God, God saw good through the foolishness [as it appears to the world] of what is preached to save those believing. . . . Because a foolish thing of God [as the world views it] is wiser than men, and a weak thing of God [as the world may see it] is stronger than men.” (Such a viewpoint on God’s part is certainly not arbitrary or unreasonable. He has provided in the Bible, the most widely circulated book in the world, a clear statement of his purpose. He has sent his witnesses to discuss it with all who will listen. How foolish for any creature to think that he has wisdom greater than that of God!)
originally posted by: whyamIhere
originally posted by: Therealbeverage
originally posted by: whyamIhere
I can’t stop thinking about a Simulation.
Why would we work every day for forty years.
Just to be too old to enjoy it.
Yet, we happily walk off to work.
At least five days a week.
Why do we accept this ?
Now you have to ask yourself are you human?
Or, am I in a simulation being manipulated by a superior species.
Is this possibly a later incarnation of a past self.
The possibilities are mind blowing.
originally posted by: Gouldielockstitch
The religious have religiously shown up.
Where is the logic?
Guess we'll have to start over?
The act of belittling or exposing to contempt, derision, or mockery. There are a number of Hebrew and Greek words that express varying degrees of ridicule, the choice of word depending on circumstances. We therefore read in the Bible of persons that mock, deride, sneer, scoff, jeer, laugh at, or make fun of others.
Ridiculers are, in general, detestable to others. (Pr 24:9) If such do not accept reproof, they will experience disaster. (Pr 1:22-27) . . . Ridiculers often refuse to listen to rebuke (Pr 13:1) and do not love those reproving them. (Pr 9:7, 8; 15:12) Nevertheless, they should be disciplined for the benefit of others. (Pr 9:12; 19:25, 29; 21:11) Instead of keeping company with such unholy ones, it is better to drive them away; much happier are those who refuse to sit with ungodly ridiculers.—Ps 1:1; Pr 22:10.
Ridicule Against God’s Servants. . . .
Ridiculing Jesus and his disciples. . . .
...
Justifiable Ridicule. . . .
Ridiculers in “the Last Days.” One feature of the sign marking “the last days” would be “ridiculers [literally, players in sport (of mocking)] with their ridicule, proceeding according to their own desires [“own desires for ungodly things”; Jude 17, 18] and saying: ‘Where is this promised presence of his? Why, from the day our forefathers fell asleep in death, all things are continuing exactly as from creation’s beginning.’” (2Pe 3:3, 4) Obviously, such ones do not heed the advice of Isaiah 28:21, 22, warning of the grave danger of scoffing at Jehovah.
“God Is Not One to Be Mocked.” The apostle Paul warns of the serious danger that attends an attempt to mock God, that is, the danger that comes to one who thinks that the principles of God’s administration can be treated with contempt or can successfully be evaded. He writes to the Galatian Christians: “For if anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he is deceiving his own mind. . . . Do not be misled: God is not one to be mocked. For whatever a man is sowing, this he will also reap; because he who is sowing with a view to his flesh will reap corruption from his flesh, but he who is sowing with a view to the spirit will reap everlasting life from the spirit.”—Ga 6:3-8.
Here the apostle shows that a person should not deceive himself with a false estimate of his own worth, thereby ignoring God and his Word. He should clean up his life to walk by the spirit as the Word directs. If a person does not do this, but instead goes on sowing with a view to fleshly desires, he is ‘accepting the undeserved kindness of God and missing its purpose’ and is treating God’s instruction as contemptible. (2Co 6:1) He may deceive himself into thinking that he is safe. Nevertheless, God knows his heart and will judge him accordingly.
originally posted by: Therealbeverage
originally posted by: whyamIhere
originally posted by: Therealbeverage
originally posted by: whyamIhere
I can’t stop thinking about a Simulation.
Why would we work every day for forty years.
Just to be too old to enjoy it.
Yet, we happily walk off to work.
At least five days a week.
Why do we accept this ?
Now you have to ask yourself are you human?
Or, am I in a simulation being manipulated by a superior species.
Is this possibly a later incarnation of a past self.
The possibilities are mind blowing.
But there has to be tells and honestly I am still unconvinced
originally posted by: whyamIhere
originally posted by: Therealbeverage
originally posted by: whyamIhere
originally posted by: Therealbeverage
originally posted by: whyamIhere
I can’t stop thinking about a Simulation.
Why would we work every day for forty years.
Just to be too old to enjoy it.
Yet, we happily walk off to work.
At least five days a week.
Why do we accept this ?
Now you have to ask yourself are you human?
Or, am I in a simulation being manipulated by a superior species.
Is this possibly a later incarnation of a past self.
The possibilities are mind blowing.
But there has to be tells and honestly I am still unconvinced
I’m not even convinced.
It is all very subtle.