Fani Willis served subpoena by the U.S. Marshals Service

I so wanted to be on her side. But yikes, her righteous indignations and overcompensation with details we are not interested in, to distract us from her grift, it just hurts!

I don't know if this is going to affect Trump's case, but, oh man, she sure is sleezy.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

I'm actually with you at this point.

As bad as this is, all things being equal, I'm not sure how this interferes with the Trump case.


She should be removed from her job and owes the people of Georgia some restitution.


Id rather see Trump get the cased tossed because the case is junk (which I think it is) than this.


But oh is it entertaining!

She is not doing herself any favors,,,especially with that attitude.

Still very entertaining at this point.

Holy crap this is awesome 🤣
She is so caustic it’s incredible.
She gave the judge side eye.
My wife gives my son that same look before she destroys him. LoL

a reply to: JinMI

So far Merchant hasn't come anywhere close to showing conflict of interest. Honestly, it doesn't even seem like she's tried. I'm surprised the judge has allowed some of the lines of questioning because they don't seem to pertain to the matter at hand.

Judge just laid the smackdown.

Got her first warning.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

So far Merchant hasn't come anywhere close to showing conflict of interest. Honestly, it doesn't even seem like she's tried. I'm surprised the judge has allowed some of the lines of questioning because they don't seem to pertain to the matter at hand.

Well....that's certainly one take.

I mean, you can say it, and I believe you believe it.

But what we are seeing doesn't indicate that at all.

Interesting question about using a cash app

I only use cash when I'm buying gold or silver.

Everything else I use my bank card.

You use cash when you're trying to hide a record of it.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Something a prosecutor would certainly know....

a reply to: JinMI

What conflict of interest has been shown that warrants the case being thrown out?

a reply to: Threadbarer

Lying about her relationship with Wade for starters. That should be enough.


But as the say goes, "but wait....there's more!"

a reply to: JinMI

How does that affect the RICO case?

a reply to: Threadbarer

Go back above and read my reply to Sookie.

You may be surprised....

She doesn't nearly seem as confident as she did.

a reply to: JinMI

So you agree that this hearing has turned up nothing that would jeopardize the RICO case.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Not yet, no.

Do you think Fani should be able to continue now that we know she ran on not sleeping with people below her, only to sleep with someone arguably below her, denying it, and now sitting in court having to try and dance around it and still not disclose it?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

So you agree that this hearing has turned up nothing that would jeopardize the RICO case.

Your talking about Trump....this case is not related.


This is about if she abused her office as district attorney. for personal gain.

Got her.

One of those two are lying.


Wade testified that he visited Yrtke (sp).

This the best free entertainment I have seen in a long time...

It's like passing a car wreck......you have to look.