Carlson to interview Putin

a reply to: pianopraze

Tucker says in video above it will be unedited:

with scripted questions and answers. ol farty ain't gonna play no games answering question he hasn't approved of yet, and if tucker ain't careful he'll be the next spying news journalist being held as a bargaining chip.

a reply to: JinMI

I absolutely loved what Vivek was saying.

But I have zero trust in him. Feels like Obama 2.0

Will give him chance, watch what he does and see if he walks the talk.

Trump Tucker now or Vivek Tucker in future could be interesting. Even Trump Vivek now, though I find that highly unlikely.

Tucker says he’s not interested but you never know.

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: pianopraze

Tucker says in video above it will be unedited:

with scripted questions and answers. ol farty ain't gonna play no games answering question he hasn't approved of yet, and if tucker ain't careful he'll be the next spying news journalist being held as a bargaining chip.

If he were in Ukraine, he'd be killed in their gulag....

a reply to: pianopraze

I share the same sentiment, loved Vivek's positions....probably too much. And that's when the alarm bells rang.


Would like to see him get some miles under his feet and some actions that back up his rhetoric before putting him in the White House, agreed.

I would very much prefer Tucker continue to remove the stink of Fox news from his tie and traveling down this road of actual journalism.

a reply to: Allaroundya4k

Lol.

Thank you.

Changed freak to real.

I’m on iPad and some of its autocorrect changes are just… freaky.

a reply to: JinMI

Do you consider Trumps rock and roll style campaign strategy a method of selling himself?

I see it more as an influencer approach to selling as opposed to a genuine or sincere sell. This would have all been different if he adjusted his style after a win. No need to stir a pot, punch down, or grandstand when you’ve already won. And for the record, he’s positioned to win again, I think he’s got a very good footing.

But alas, a leader has to lead. And that’s hard when you feed or leverage your position on opposition internally and externally.

tend to agree. We've talked in the past about Trump being the result, not the problem.

Not to split hairs, I see him more as a symptom than a problem.

He’s not the underlying problem more so than a result of the real problems.

The left refused to give viable alternatives, and the right alike.

The left suppressed their alternative to the status quo (Bernie), and the right has only looked for white bread alternatives which shows their disconnection with their base.


Most of the nation has shown they’re against the uniparty who often agrees on interests that differ from the broader populace. And alas, they both default to propping up a poor choice while highlighting it’s just barely a better option from the oppositions alternative. A race to the bottom.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Not to split hairs, I see him more as a symptom than a problem.

He’s not the underlying problem more so than a result of the real problems.

The left refused to give viable alternatives, and the right alike.

Perhaps that was it. I may have amended the notion in my own mind at some point for the same reason of no other viable alternative. Vivek perhaps, but that was it, the rest stayed on message of the historical R's and none of them stood a chance against Trump. So when he was a symptom, him now being the result seems apt to me.

How's that for hair splitting!

Most of the nation has shown they’re against the uniparty who often agrees on interests that differ from the broader populace. And alas, they both default to propping up a poor choice while highlighting it’s just barely a better option from the oppositions alternative. A race to the bottom.

And to your point this is largely a problem stemmed from media. It created a carefully crafted flatulence smelling chamber from DC to CNN.

All while the country burned.

originally posted by: pianopraze
It’s official.

Carlson is interviewing Putin.

....

Carlson is not bound by the controlling powers of western media so I am looking forward to this interview.
....

That's true. Instead, Carlson will be bound by the controlling powers of Russian media. That would be Putin. Why do you think Putin chose Carlson? Because he knows Tucker will say exactly what he wants him to say. Tucker is Putin's tool.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Tuckums

Should we call all you Biden lovers Sniffums?

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Tuckums

Should we call all you Biden lovers Sniffums?

That's reserved for Hunter, sorry.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Should we call all you Biden lovers Sniffums?

Not seeing it? This thread isn't about Biden.
It's about Tucker (Tuckums) Carlson interviewing Putin.

a reply to: pianopraze


Putins minister of propaganda in amerika .

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Excerpts from the interview

I can't wait to count the amount of whataboutisms Putin will pull off. A Russian tradition in conversational discourse.

a reply to: Kenzo

Not wanting to prop up the most corrupt country in Europe with US taxpayers dollars doesn't make someone a Putin propagandist.

a reply to: watchitburn


Carlsson is traitor, propagandist who wants to support fascist Putin/Russia .

Militarization of society is at high speed in Russia, hallmark of fascism , among other details. Litle children play war ,not really much differense to what hamas do with children in Gaza is it..

Yet all is good to many Americans who seem to fell love with it....

You people here, who support fascism are nothing more than f......s

a reply to: Kenzo

We're dealing those same problems here.

Russia just isn't our problem. It's the Russian people's problem, let them deal with it and we'll deal with our own problems.

a reply to: watchitburn


You are just Putins apologist

a reply to: Kenzo

Look,

I don’t think Putin should get a pass on anything.

But calling people who at least want to explore the full landscape traitors and fascists isn’t going to help the cause.

Just like when we were going into Iraq everyone who was opposing the idea were called anti patriotic or terrorist sympathizers.

You argue the warrants of your position and explain how the other position is wrong.

If people want to say that the west started this war, you note Russia did both invasions. If they want to say we have absolutely no business helping Ukraine you point to the Budapest Memorandum.

Calling people names is hyperbolic and no different than WIB calling everything they disagree with communist. It loses all value after a while.