D.C. Court of Appeals made a horrible ruling against Trump

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: RazorV66

If the standard of law being applied to Trump was applied to ALL politicians, I'd have zero problems.

It IS being applied equally to all Presidents who have ever been indicted for illegally attempting to stay in power by subverting the peaceful transfer of power after their term ended.

Turns out there's only one, and he's orange, if that gives you a hint.

Trump lost the election and complained about it. Al Gore did the same. Trump had a rally. Trump complained to the people at the rally. The people at the rally went to the capitol. A few people started some sh!t. Most if not all have been arrested. Other than complaining, and being president when the riot happened, how did Trump "illegally attempting to stay in power by subverting the peaceful transfer of power after their term ended"?

I know you won't answer, because you don't come back to threads you post in. But others here who are sure this is true can explain what actions Trump took to stay in power. Hint, he complained.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: WeMustCare

Even if SCOTUS takes up the case, we're still on schedule for the trial to start by August and wrap up in October.

There's also the possibility they choose to take up the case but don't issue a stay. A stay requires five justices voting in its favor, while voting to consider the case only requires four.

hopefully your side can get at least one corrupt court to rule Trump is a criminal before the election. I realize that's the only way the dems can beat him. You do as well it seems. And that's totally cool, no issues with using the court system to subvert democracy all while screaming the guy you are trying to put in prison for daring to run for office is trying to destroy democracy. Do you even realize how stupid you look right now?

a reply to: network dude

Do you even realize how stupid you look right now?

They have no clue how stupid they look.
Day after day, week after week, year after year……Orange Man is bad and orange. Over and over.

To realize they look stupid, they would have to have at least some self awareness to feel embarrassment.
Because they are a complete embarrassment to themselves.

I hear that Trump, besides interviewing attorneys for his defamation appeal, is going to need someone to appeal this ruling to the Supreme Court. I'm wonder how many posters who obtained their legal degrees by staying at the ATS Holiday Inn will take up this noble call of service?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

I hear that Trump, besides interviewing attorneys for his defamation appeal, is going to need someone to appeal this ruling to the Supreme Court. I'm wonder how many posters who obtained their legal degrees by staying at the ATS Holiday Inn will take up this noble call of service?

Check with the Liberal Cracker Jack “lawyers” here.

Here is where they got their law degrees.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

I hear that Trump, besides interviewing attorneys for his defamation appeal, is going to need someone to appeal this ruling to the Supreme Court. I'm wonder how many posters who obtained their legal degrees by staying at the ATS Holiday Inn will take up this noble call of service?

Working for Trump has got to be way better than having to bang Fani Willis for a paycheck.

originally posted by: RazorV66
Check with the Liberal Cracker Jack “lawyers” here.

What's your strategy for the appeal? On what grounds should the very unfairly persecuted Donald Trump ask the Supreme Court for relief?

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

I hear that Trump, besides interviewing attorneys for his defamation appeal, is going to need someone to appeal this ruling to the Supreme Court. I'm wonder how many posters who obtained their legal degrees by staying at the ATS Holiday Inn will take up this noble call of service?

Working for Trump has got to be way better than having to bang Fani Willis for a paycheck.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: RazorV66
Check with the Liberal Cracker Jack “lawyers” here.

What's your strategy for the appeal? On what grounds should the very unfairly persecuted Donald Trump ask the Supreme Court for relief?

Not my job and I really don’t care.
At some point the deluded Liberal’s case will probably fall apart on its own.
All of their other houses of cards have crumbled in the last 8 years trying to get Trump, why should I believe this will be any different?

originally posted by: RazorV66
At some point the deluded Liberal’s case will probably fall apart on its own.

It doesn't appear it's going to happen on this one. But we'll know more next week when the Supreme Court decides if the DC Court of Appeals is correct or the ATS Legal Beagles are correct.

a reply to: frogs453

You are wrong on every point.... impressive...

The fact you think semen is the the same as a life is just the highest form of duncery and thinking that roe was ever "settled law" flys in the face of every fact available over the last 40 years or so

originally posted by: neoholographicpart2


If Republican Lawyers were smart

They're not, and that's why Rudy Giuliani is now bankrupt.

Republican voters aren't very smart either, and that's why they keep voting for Trump.

This is how a country end's up when it values its corporate handouts above its educational system, lot's of stupid people and and a bunch of clowns on both sides of the Government!

originally posted by: Fdttaut

originally posted by: neoholographicpart2


If Republican Lawyers were smart

They're not, and that's why Rudy Giuliani is now bankrupt.

Republican voters aren't very smart either, and that's why they keep voting for Trump.

This is how a country end's up when it values its corporate handouts above its educational system, lot's of stupid people and and a bunch of clowns on both sides of the Government!

So? Why do democratic ran cities have such a low quality of education? Why such high dropout rates and low scores for inner city schools. Why is New York failing to recruit good candidates for police officers?

a reply to: Fdttaut

?
As pointed out by another poster…

With so many cases overturned, the Ninth Circuit faced an unusually high reversal rate of 94% for the October 2020 term. The Ninth’s average reversal rate since 2007 was just 79%. The last time the Ninth had a higher reversal rate was in 1985, when 25 of 26 cases were overturned.

www.pacificresearch.org...

originally posted by: Fdttaut

originally posted by: neoholographicpart2


If Republican Lawyers were smart

They're not, and that's why Rudy Giuliani is now bankrupt.

Republican voters aren't very smart either, and that's why they keep voting for Trump.

This is how a country end's up when it values its corporate handouts above its educational system, lot's of stupid people and and a bunch of clowns on both sides of the Government!

if only we would all embrace open borders, dumbing down education to the stupidest in the room, Sh1tting on those who served the nation in favor of those who break the law and come here illegally, fighting for a man's right to have a child pop out of his ass. Only then would we be enlightened. Only then would we understand the great vision the left has for destroying the country with dignity. I'm glad you were here today to provide this thought provoking post. You are a true asset.

a reply to: Lazy88

What does the Ninth Circuit have to do with the DC Circuit?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Lazy88

What does the Ninth Circuit have to do with the DC Circuit?

Look at the context to the reply to Fdttaut’s post.

a reply to: Lazy88

Here's the thing you need to remember, SCOTUS isn't taking up a case unless they know there's a good chance it's going to be overturned. SCOTUS gets hundreds, if not thousands of petitions, every year and all but a small handful get rejected.

Meaning the lower court's ruling stands in the vast majority of cases that petition the SCOTUS.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Lazy88

Here's the thing you need to remember, SCOTUS isn't taking up a case unless they know there's a good chance it's going to be overturned. SCOTUS gets hundreds, if not thousands of petitions, every year and all but a small handful get rejected.

Meaning the lower court's ruling stands in the vast majority of cases that petition the SCOTUS.

You don’t think it’s worthy of the SC to take up the case of a former POTUS?

The witch hunt cases against Trump by his political rivals are unprecedented in the history of our country.

a reply to: RazorV66

It could go either way. With the appellate judges being unanimous and so thorough in their ruling, SCOTUS may hold off in ruling on this matter until the full case works its way through the courts.