Lets hate on Republicans

The NWO in alliance with U.S. Democrats are trying to establish special economic and political zones. Watch how they do it.

Here's one agency looting The Treasury with BS . . . ☠️


USAID Announces More Than $450 Million in Development Funding to Address Root Causes of Migration in Central America

a reply to: AlexandrosOMegas

Of ALLLL the countries out there who ask us for money, why has it got to be Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine!? Some corrupt nobody country!? Why is it that the one time we decide in history that we will take it upon ourselves to fund their entire war effort just happens to be the exact same nation who is just K OWN for money laundering and corruption!?

The answer is nuance.

I’ll answer your question with a question.

Why is it that many see Russias side more when they’re arguably the biggest ally of Iran who they’ll gladly point as one of the biggest threats?

Why is it that both parties are willing to combat terrorism into countries that have never been close to direct conflict with the US while omitting a whole chapter from the 9/11 commission report for an “ally”.

Why is it we refuse to leave the Middle East even though only 10%~ of our oil comes from there?

Sadly a lot of our policy is making good on old promises even if it’s at a cost to our current footing.

The Budapest memorandum was a deal to help prevent more countries acquiring nuclear arms. We still have a big presence in South Korea so they don’t get the itch to make nuclear weapons. We’re using money and arms instead of direct involvement so that all of our other relations don’t question the resolve of a deal.

How many countries would want nuclear weapons if they weren’t under umbrellas?

I'm in awe that we spent sixteen bucks for the wife and I to eat at Culvers today which included the senior discount. We felt a little guilty for spending that amount of money on lunch when we were out shopping today.

I guess I am old fashioned because I think budgeting money is important.

Isn't money worth anything to politicians these days? I suppose they will all want big raises for handing out so much money...such hard work.

"borders bill"

ha

a reply to: rickymouse

Ricky, while I hate to discount the real rise of inflation…

I have to implore you count your blessings, like readily access to Culver’s, but I’d be remissed if I excluded Jets as well.

And I must admit from my many MI visits, Jets is pricey. They force you to use their website to get deals, which is unfair for some consumers… but sometimes you can’t cut corners to get eight corners:

a reply to: JinMI

" Lets hate on Republicans "


Ah , Only the Bad Ones , Right ? *)

It's apparently DOA in the House:

I’ve seen enough. This bill is even worse than we expected, and won’t come close to ending the border catastrophe the President has created. As the lead Democrat negotiator proclaimed: Under this legislation, “the border never closes.”

If this bill reaches the House, it will be dead on arrival.

Mike Johnson, Speaker.

Both sides suck but biden is too far gone too even speak without instructions

originally posted by: JinMI
It's apparently DOA in the House:

I’ve seen enough. This bill is even worse than we expected, and won’t come close to ending the border catastrophe the President has created. As the lead Democrat negotiator proclaimed: Under this legislation, “the border never closes.”

If this bill reaches the House, it will be dead on arrival.

Mike Johnson, Speaker.

It's pretty simple, really. Just push separate bills for separate issues. Some states have constitutions that require this. It is one of the glaring shortfalls in our nations Constitution. Bills stand on their individual merit.

Glad Mr. Johnson is standing by his original 'separate funding' stance.

originally posted by: AlexandrosOMegas
QUIT THE GOD DAMN UKRAINE FUNDING DAMMIT! Obviously that guy is trying to get his obvious payoff if the bill makes it his way. This whole Ukraine crap is the most obvious theft I have ever seen. Of ALLLL the countries out there who ask us for money, why has it got to be Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine!? Some corrupt nobody country!? Why is it that the one time we decide in history that we will take it upon ourselves to fund their entire war effort just happens to be the exact same nation who is just K OWN for money laundering and corruption!? Why has it got to be the very nation our of 200 something whom the president has laundered millions through!? Because now they are laundering billions for him! Honestly, everyone is hinting to civil war. One more request for money from Ukraine and it is Civil War time in my book! They're up to taking what amounts to $35,000 per bullet. At least make it believable...

I dont think we (Eu+Us) should just stop the funding and deliver Ukraine to Russia after all the unjust atrocities they committed. We should first start talking talking to Russia again to get some form of an end resolution in sight.

I understand not wanting Russia to expand, and I understand not wanting Russia to take over Ukraine and that they are innocent victims of Russian aggression and all .... but those billions upon billions that we spent buying bullets for the Ukraines could have been spent on American elderly who don't have enough money to pay for rent and food, or it could have been spent on the 20% of American children who go to bed hungry at night ... instead of bullets to shoot Russians with on the other side of the planet.

I know, I know .... stopping Russia is a good thing.
But we aren't the only country in the world and it should not be us funding all this.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: JinMI

Biden could reverse the border crisis right now by ending the EO's he signed and reinstating Trumps.

Hey Doughy.
Got anything of actual value to add to the discussion other than pointing out the obvious?

Love how you just gloss over the fact the op mentioned both sides are screwing us over with some stupid catch all statement just geared to generate stars from the ATS seals...

Daddy Trump won't save you sport.


Side question.
How's the genocide going?

So this singular bill, if passed, would put every adult over 18 on the hook for $357 per person.

***This isn't counting the other $113 Billion that has gone to Ukraine last year, and another $3+ Billion per year to Israel***

Last year alone, that's accounting for $116 BILLION dollars to foreign nations (of which is at least on the books), which is an individual tax bill of $450 per person.

It's not that hard to see why so many people are saying F the IRS this year...

a reply to: FlyersFan

Not to mention all the Ukraine related corruption here and there. 😃

a reply to: DBCowboy

You know that they won't. Illegals crossing into the country benefits businesses by providing cheap labor. As long as big business provides campaign funds. You will never see that border close.

originally posted by: Halfswede

originally posted by: JinMI
It's apparently DOA in the House:

I’ve seen enough. This bill is even worse than we expected, and won’t come close to ending the border catastrophe the President has created. As the lead Democrat negotiator proclaimed: Under this legislation, “the border never closes.”

If this bill reaches the House, it will be dead on arrival.

Mike Johnson, Speaker.

It's pretty simple, really. Just push separate bills for separate issues. Some states have constitutions that require this. It is one of the glaring shortfalls in our nations Constitution. Bills stand on their individual merit.

Glad Mr. Johnson is standing by his original 'separate funding' stance.

That would be great.

Unfortunately, there is zero incentive for our representatives to do so.

originally posted by: pianopraze
I feel sorry for Republicans. They’ve been betrayed by their own party.

At least they complain about it.

Democrats seem to go along with their party’s insanity or be too scared to speak up. I think I’ve only met one in real life who will complain. Every Republican I know complains about their party.

Meanwhile almost every libertarian is too busy attacking other libertarians for not being libertarian enough.

World dun gon mads.

Not only apt, but it made me laugh.

Good analysis.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: JinMI

Wasn't Turnip a Reeeeeeeeepublican?

(apologies, I mistyped).

He used to be a democrat until he realized the DNC is a viper nest of anti constitutional white collar criminals obligated to their off shore accounts versus the interests of the american public.

Now he's a republican.

Eisenhower warned about this during his famous exit speech yet nobody listened (or forgot). Putting this in R or D context is simply for keeping the feeble-minded distracted