Harvard Diversity Officer Accused of 40 Counts of Plagiarism

a reply to: FlyersFan

It's specifically about a POC in an elitist position at Harvard involved with DEI no less where an anonymous complaint was made against her. Same thing happened with another POC in an elitist position there - same MO. It's suspect FF and why aren't you pulling up any other examples from other universities where persons not of color are also going through the same experiences? Because persons not of color involved with DEI aren't getting anonymous complaints against them.

a reply to: quintessentone

Congratulations. You’ve fooled these guys for ten pages. Apparently they’ve never seen a wrestling match or a Harlem Globetrotters game.
Personally, I was heartbroken when I saw Hulk Hogan and the Iron Sheik drinking and laughing together. But in my defense, I was only ten.

originally posted by: Myhandle
a reply to: quintessentone

Congratulations. You’ve fooled these guys for ten pages. Apparently they’ve never seen a wrestling match or a Harlem Globetrotters game.
Personally, I was heartbroken when I saw Hulk Hogan and the Iron Sheik drinking and laughing together. But in my defense, I was only ten.

Isn't there a law?

a reply to: quintessentone

Probably; there’s too many laws if you ask me. What? You care about child safety now?

originally posted by: quintessentone
why aren't you pulling up any other examples from other universities where persons not of color are also going through the same experiences?

Harvard was in the spotlight because of antisemitism. It had to testify in front of congress. It failed miserably. The people at Harvard are going to be checked on after that. Your insinuation that this is all because she's black or female is wrong. The fact is, this is a situation of her own making. And she shouldn't be allowed to get away with it because she's black and female.

originally posted by: BernnieJGato

IMO, it all boils down to greed. they are going after all the money that "Diversity" will bring in. they could give a rat's ass about DEI. If they have to lie, cheat and cover their chosen ones so be it.

Greed runs the world, that is for sure, especially when prestigious universities and colleges are taking millions of foreign monies from countries that are not friendly to the US and our policies, like whores they will cater to their biggest money giving interest.

All these colleges need to be scrutinizer and investigated; they are turning the word prestigious into a dirty word with their dirty employees.

a reply to: quintessentone

Hopefully all the dirty deceiving liars will be exposed and taken off their prestigious positions within Harvard, is just incredible that such an entity is full of trash.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
why aren't you pulling up any other examples from other universities where persons not of color are also going through the same experiences?

Harvard was in the spotlight because of antisemitism. It had to testify in front of congress. It failed miserably. The people at Harvard are going to be checked on after that. Your insinuation that this is all because she's black or female is wrong. The fact is, this is a situation of her own making. And she shouldn't be allowed to get away with it because she's black and female.

“We have lawmakers getting intimately involved in trying to dictate governance on campus, and this seems unacceptable,” said Melani Cammett, a professor of international affairs who helped organize the petition. Harvard needs to reckon with campus polarization, she added, but “that’s not something that should be controlled by external actors.”

www.pbs.org...

If she is proven innocent what then will she be getting away with?

For a conspiracy site it's telling that nobody sees the conspiracy here. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone

Her diversity and skin color is not an excuse for her deplorable behavior on stealing other people's intellectual properties.

Should it really be viewed as their property though? (I'm not defending plagiarism)

“You Received Free, Give Free”

“YOU received free, give free.” (Matthew 10:8) Jesus issued that instruction to his apostles when he sent them forth to preach the good news. Did the apostles obey this directive? Yes, and they continued to do so even after Jesus departed from the earth.

For instance, when the former sorcerer Simon saw the miraculous powers possessed by the apostles Peter and John, he offered to pay them to impart that power to him. But Peter rebuked Simon, saying: “May your silver perish with you, because you thought through money to get possession of the free gift of God.”​—Acts 8:18-20.

The apostle Paul displayed a spirit similar to Peter’s. Paul could have allowed himself to be a financial burden to his Christian brothers in Corinth. However, he worked with his own hands to support himself. (Acts 18:1-3) Thus, he could say with confidence that he had preached the good news to the Corinthians “without cost.”​—1 Corinthians 4:12; 9:18.

Sad to say, many who claim to be followers of Christ have not shown the same willingness to “give free.” Indeed, many of the religious leaders in Christendom will “instruct just for a price.” (Micah 3:11) Some religious leaders have even become wealthy from money collected from their flocks. In 1989, one U.S. evangelist was sentenced to a jail term of 45 years. The reason? He had been “defrauding supporters of millions of dollars and using some of the money to buy homes, cars, holidays and even an air-conditioned dog kennel.”​—People’s Daily Graphic, October 7, 1989.

In Ghana, according to the Ghanaian Times of March 31, 1990, a Roman Catholic priest took money that had been collected during one church service and hurled it back at the congregation. “His reason,” says the paper, “was that, as adults, they were expected to contribute in higher denominations.” Not surprisingly, many churches even try to appeal to greed in its members, actively promoting gambling activities and other schemes in order to raise money.

...

2 Corinthians 2:14-17:

But thanks be to God, who always leads us in a triumphal procession in company with the Christ and through us spreads the fragrance of the knowledge of him in every place! 15 For to God we are a sweet fragrance of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing; 16 to the latter ones an odor of death leading to death, to the former ones a fragrance of life leading to life. And who is adequately qualified for these things? 17 We are, for we are not peddlers of the word of God as many men are, but we speak in all sincerity as sent from God, yes, in the sight of God and in company with Christ.

2 Timothy 3:16,17:

All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be fully competent, completely equipped for every good work.

How satisfyingly delightful the inspired Scriptures are! What an amazing fund of true knowledge they provide! They are indeed “the very knowledge of God” that has been sought after and treasured by lovers of righteousness in all ages.​—Prov. 2:5.

Solomon, a king and educator in ancient times, evaluated godly wisdom in these words: “Having it as gain is better than having silver as gain and having it as produce than gold itself. It is more precious than corals, and all other delights of yours cannot be made equal to it.”​—Prov. 3:14, 15. Verse 13 says: “Happy is the man who finds wisdom and the man who acquires discernment” (more details about discernment can be found in my previous commentary as well as the article linked in my signature).

a reply to: quintessentone

Sorry, I wasn't aware you were a mod.....oh that's right you're not.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: network dude

If you wish to call everyone who disagrees with you a racist, that's your right, but any reputation you might have here will be forever tainted with that slant. And someone might even make it their signature. If they enjoyed pulling your sting and watching your squawk that is.

I never called anyone a racist, that's misreprentation but my reputation doesn't hinge on you and you know who else. So it's all good. Continue your back and forth flip flopping on first she is guilty and now she may not be guilty squawking as it entertains many here.

You kind of need to go back and read what you wrote. I sensed your intent was to call me a racist. And intent is everything.

I didn't flip flop, I stated a fact. In fact, I stated the same fact you did earlier. That the investigation hasn't happened yet, and they may find her innocent. If that's wrong, just bring a coherent argument as to why. You aren't batting 1000 in that department thus far, but who knows, you might surprise us. And you are totally 100% correct in that my opinion of you means nothing. That comes from everyone who opens this thread and reads your pages and pages of strange words. I think you are super.

All I said was you all seem to hate diversity - that was it, nothing else. The rest of you filled in your own blanks. FF thinks it has only to do with racism and sexism. Well I don't.

And you do flip flop as it suits your misrepresenting people on this site.

I think you are close to what I personally believe, but unless "the right" is a monolith, just as "the left" is, then you are incorrect with labeling everyone with your broad brush.

I think a system based on merit (like the military used to be and professional sports currently is) is the best way to run things. When you hire based on skin color and ignore who is most qualified, you miss many good or great people who might help advance your cause. case in point, the current VP. Joetatoe made the statement before she was even announced, that he was going to pick a woman of color for his VP. that eliminated anyone who wasn't a black woman (there I go again, I hope I hear this new rule soon) from a very important position. Now that isn't to say that a black woman wouldn't make the cut, just that if you only pick from that pool, you have limited your options.

If you run a business and you feel that hiring from a diversity pool is better than hiring from a meritocracy position, then that's on you. You can base your decision against other businesses that hired based on merit and see who's business does better. Perhaps yours will win. But you don't strike me as the "be your own boss" kind of person.

a reply to: network dude

Again, that's not for anyone to decide but the university.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Sorry, I wasn't aware you were a mod.....oh that's right you're not.

Off topic as always.

a reply to: whereislogic

I am sure the prestigious diversity officer will follow the same path as Gay.

Sadly to point out, they are both females and black.

No a good picture for those that see these persons as role models, it is the desirable intent after all for Harvard to fill their staff with prestigious positions that will be role models for students.

a reply to: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Now that's a topic that I can overlook.

originally posted by: FlyersFan
And she shouldn't be allowed to get away with it because she's black and female.

that's kind of the crux of all this.

Does the poster who opposes this thread believe that because a person is both black and female, that she is immune from wrongdoing?

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: whereislogic

I am sure the prestigious diversity officer will follow the same path as Gay.

Sadly to point out, they are both females and black.

No a good picture for those that see these persons as role models, it is the desirable intent after all for Harvard to fill their staff with prestigious positions that will be role models for students.

The same path as Gay would mean that she was shown to have made insignificant citing mistakes and she got so pissed that she quit. Is that what you mean?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: FlyersFan
And she shouldn't be allowed to get away with it because she's black and female.

that's kind of the crux of all this.

Does the poster who opposes this thread believe that because a person is both black and female, that she is immune from wrongdoing?

Shouldn't you be asking the poster who you think opposes this thread speak for themselves? Oh wait, no that's not how it goes.

originally posted by: FlyersFan


Harvard was in the spotlight because of antisemitism. It had to testify in front of congress. It failed miserably.

No only that but siding with terrorist groups also, glorifying the dead of all the people during October 10 attack on Israel. Including rape and murder.

Any University that support this type of behavior and actions by groups within their ranks needs to be investigated and Tax payer funds withheld.