It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone
Then who those words comes from is of merit, no?
That's for the people of the jury to decide.
I'm not asking a jury, I'm asking you.
I would assume so because aren't witnesses ok'd by both parties lawyers? I'm not a lawyer, maybe ask OldCarpy.
Anyway, Donald lost another case and has to pay another $400,000 to 3 reporters.
www.cbc.ca...
Judges can dismiss people for bias. Judge eliminated all trump friendly jurors,in short NO ONE who was a peer of donald trump was on the jury.
Would they not have selector jurors who don't give a rats ass about politics?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone
Then who those words comes from is of merit, no?
That's for the people of the jury to decide.
I'm not asking a jury, I'm asking you.
I would assume so because aren't witnesses ok'd by both parties lawyers? I'm not a lawyer, maybe ask OldCarpy.
Anyway, Donald lost another case and has to pay another $400,000 to 3 reporters.
www.cbc.ca...
Judges can dismiss people for bias. Judge eliminated all trump friendly jurors,in short NO ONE who was a peer of donald trump was on the jury.
Would they not have selector jurors who don't give a rats ass about politics?
Isn’t this the group the judge said use a false name and never tell anyone you were on this jury?
But — some assume it was an internationally bias jury against Trump.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: yuppa
What does the jury process for Canada have to do with this?
originally posted by: JinMI
A video from a perspective that usually doesn't agree with my own.
12 minutes, pretty straight forward.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone
Did you watch the full video?
Because he covers that with Carroll's amended complaint......
The complaint was for rape. Rape was not found.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone
Did you watch the full video?
Because he covers that with Carroll's amended complaint......
The complaint was for rape. Rape was not found.
He lost credibility with me within the first the few seconds of the narration he gave.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone
Did you watch the full video?
Because he covers that with Carroll's amended complaint......
The complaint was for rape. Rape was not found.
He lost credibility with me within the first the few seconds of the narration he gave.
Speaking of credibility.......
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone
This dead horse sure seems to draw in folks who hold opinions that they can not articulate nor substantiate.
If this trend continues, I'm riding it all the way to the glue factory.
Do you not find it troubling that you hold opinions that contradict facts?
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone
Well, what can I say.
I'm glad to be on the side of facts and happy that you see that's where my position is....versus your opinions.
What a glorious post guy.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI
30 + pages of dead horse being flogged?
Opinions have been articulated, yet you just airbrush them.
Bored now. Again.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone
You may move on. Nothing is stopping you.
I think this is far from over myself.