It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

page: 31
18
<< 28  29  30    32  33  34 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2024 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Then who those words comes from is of merit, no?


That's for the people of the jury to decide.


I'm not asking a jury, I'm asking you.


I would assume so because aren't witnesses ok'd by both parties lawyers? I'm not a lawyer, maybe ask OldCarpy.

Anyway, Donald lost another case and has to pay another $400,000 to 3 reporters.

www.cbc.ca...


Judges can dismiss people for bias. Judge eliminated all trump friendly jurors,in short NO ONE who was a peer of donald trump was on the jury.


Would they not have selector jurors who don't give a rats ass about politics?


Isn’t this the group the judge said use a false name and never tell anyone you were on this jury?

But — some assume it was an internationally bias jury against Trump.



posted on Jan, 31 2024 @ 05:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Then who those words comes from is of merit, no?


That's for the people of the jury to decide.


I'm not asking a jury, I'm asking you.


I would assume so because aren't witnesses ok'd by both parties lawyers? I'm not a lawyer, maybe ask OldCarpy.

Anyway, Donald lost another case and has to pay another $400,000 to 3 reporters.

www.cbc.ca...


Judges can dismiss people for bias. Judge eliminated all trump friendly jurors,in short NO ONE who was a peer of donald trump was on the jury.


Would they not have selector jurors who don't give a rats ass about politics?


Isn’t this the group the judge said use a false name and never tell anyone you were on this jury?

But — some assume it was an internationally bias jury against Trump.



Yes, I just read that recently. Scary stuff.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:56 AM
link   



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 06:04 AM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

What does the jury process for Canada have to do with this?



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: yuppa

What does the jury process for Canada have to do with this?


Apparently its the SAME in america. So way to go champ.

people.howstuffworks.com...#:~:text=Each%20side%27s%20lawyers%20can%20reject%20a%20number%20of,of%20case%20%5Bsource%3A%20C ornell%20University%20Law%20School%20%5D.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

LOL. Did you just link a cruddy article titled 'Why Do Some People Get Called for Jury Duty More Than Others?' and try to pass that off as explaining the voir dire process?

AHAHAHAHA.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:29 PM
link   
A video from a perspective that usually doesn't agree with my own.

12 minutes, pretty straight forward.




posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
A video from a perspective that usually doesn't agree with my own.

12 minutes, pretty straight forward.



Listen to the guy right at the beginning how the facts are twisted; he only uses the word assaulted when there is clear and definitive distinctions that the words rape and sexual assault were both used and are not one in the same thing.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: quintessentone

Did you watch the full video?

Because he covers that with Carroll's amended complaint......

The complaint was for rape. Rape was not found.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Did you watch the full video?

Because he covers that with Carroll's amended complaint......

The complaint was for rape. Rape was not found.


He lost credibility with me within the first the few seconds of the narration he gave.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Did you watch the full video?

Because he covers that with Carroll's amended complaint......

The complaint was for rape. Rape was not found.


He lost credibility with me within the first the few seconds of the narration he gave.



Speaking of credibility.......



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Did you watch the full video?

Because he covers that with Carroll's amended complaint......

The complaint was for rape. Rape was not found.


He lost credibility with me within the first the few seconds of the narration he gave.



Speaking of credibility.......




Beating another dead horse again? Where is it getting you?

edit on q00000056229America/Chicago3636America/Chicago2 by quintessentone because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 03:59 PM
link   
a reply to: quintessentone


This dead horse sure seems to draw in folks who hold opinions that they can not articulate nor substantiate.


If this trend continues, I'm riding it all the way to the glue factory.


Do you not find it troubling that you hold opinions that contradict facts?



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 04:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone


This dead horse sure seems to draw in folks who hold opinions that they can not articulate nor substantiate.


If this trend continues, I'm riding it all the way to the glue factory.


Do you not find it troubling that you hold opinions that contradict facts?


I find that my and others' opinions about this specific topic only contradict your facts and 'no' it is not troubling at all, but it should be to you.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 04:05 PM
link   
a reply to: quintessentone

Well, what can I say.


I'm glad to be on the side of facts and happy that you see that's where my position is....versus your opinions.

What a glorious post guy.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 04:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

Well, what can I say.


I'm glad to be on the side of facts and happy that you see that's where my position is....versus your opinions.

What a glorious post guy.


If you are happy with your position then it's all good and we all can move on.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

30 + pages of dead horse being flogged?

Opinions have been articulated, yet you just airbrush them.

Bored now. Again.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: quintessentone

You may move on. Nothing is stopping you.


I think this is far from over myself.



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

30 + pages of dead horse being flogged?

Opinions have been articulated, yet you just airbrush them.

Bored now. Again.


Thanks for stopping in again after your 3 time of stomping off. Appreciate it.


..so does my dead horse.



Did you watch the video above? Wanna talk about it?



posted on Feb, 1 2024 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: quintessentone

You may move on. Nothing is stopping you.


I think this is far from over myself.


Well I'll stick around and watch you post desperate videos that do nothing to make your case.




top topics



 
18
<< 28  29  30    32  33  34 >>

log in

join