Jellyfish UFO in 2018 over Iraq

There's a second video from two days ago I just saw on Reddit. The same timeline and location as the first video.

It's included from JC's Youtube : WEAPONIZED : EPISODE #47 : THE "JELLYFISH" UFO - How It Happened & What It Means

The quality is even worse than the first and there's really nothing to see. I haven't watched the whole video, so I don't know what they have to say about this one.

Is it the same thing, something different or just more bird crap...? If the latter, those Iraqi birds sure need a change of diet.

the second video clip starts at 00:27:54.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: Encia22


I guess no one sees a head swivel and possibly two "eyes" come into view. The video is such poor quality that it is probably just artifacts, but, I find it very odd...

You mean something possibly like this?

👽

Personally I see one eye, or the side eye of a big eyed individual:

TMZ:


Enhanced:

a reply to: pianopraze




I see the side profile head …….of a being ….that is riding on a gravitic articulated tripod gear vehicle.

There’s a semi-wraparound panel at it’s head that may also incorporate a headrest.

There is a control/display panel near its left side elbow.

The being is in a seated position and presumably it’s legs are enclosed while seated.

Both hands and forearms are exposed.

The propulsion unit is centered and just behind the being’s rear.

The tripod subsystem is arranged with two forward articulated legs and articulated land pads….the longer third articulated leg and articulated landing pad is centered at the rear just under the rear propulsion unit.

👽

a reply to: pianopraze

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

That's a nice rendering, but it is made with an AI resolution upscaler. As such, the missing pixels in the original image are literally guessed and added. That enhancement could be done by a host of different AI image tools and you would get a variety of outputs. It’s like giving the grainy image to an artist who paints in the missing bits according to his/her interpretation.

Unfortunately, we're dealing with an IR video transmission, outputted to a TV/PC monitor, recorded from a certain distance with a digital camera (1st compression), uploaded to J.C.'s YT page (2nd compression) and then grabbed by people and manipulated and re-uploaded to various sites (3rd compression).

However, having said that, I think there’s something more to the original video than just bird poop. I’d be curious to see how the same AI enhancement engine would interpret an image of a bird deposit.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

….the longer third articulated leg and articulated landing pad is centered at the rear just under the rear propulsion unit.

Propulsion unit?

If the complete lack of ANY UFO applicable observable traits isn't enough- this vid. comes from the guy with the most thoroughly debunked UFO videos in modern memory.

Where's your critical thinking?


This acts exactly like some balloons/decorations tied together.

a reply to: BeardensBeard

Thank you for saying balloons and decorations. This was my very first thought which I stated on YT where I first saw this. At some points I can even make out a heart shape.

That said, balloons wouldn't go under water.
That said, we only have a man's words for that and we know people can and will lie for whatever reasons.

There seems no movement by itself, it just drifts.

I think we can now add Jeremy Corbell as just another UFO Grifter if he wasn't already on the list.

It's a bunch of Balloons just drifting out to sea. If indeed they are anywhere near the Sea.

originally posted by: BeardensBeard

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

….the longer third articulated leg and articulated landing pad is centered at the rear just under the rear propulsion unit.

Propulsion unit?

If the complete lack of ANY UFO applicable observable traits isn't enough- this vid. comes from the guy with the most thoroughly debunked UFO videos in modern memory.

Where's your critical thinking?


This acts exactly like some balloons/decorations tied together.

Now that you mentioned balloons and decorations, all I see are balloon shapes with streamers.

a reply to: quintessentone

Wont let me upload to ATS but someone suggested Eid Balloons/Streamers and posted a few examples of the crescent moon and stars available.

ibb.co...

Chances are it was taken within the pre requisite holiday time frame but why bother to check dates given the lack of UAP observables?- in all likelihood it's another Corbell mis-identification of the prosaic.

originally posted by: BeardensBeard

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

….the longer third articulated leg and articulated landing pad is centered at the rear just under the rear propulsion unit.

Propulsion unit?

If the complete lack of ANY UFO applicable observable traits isn't enough- this vid. comes from the guy with the most thoroughly debunked UFO videos in modern memory.

Where's your critical thinking?

This acts exactly like some balloons/decorations tied together.

Critical Thinking?

Everything presented in this thread is speculative “What If’s”.

Ask pianopraze….where he got the “enhanced” rendition shown on this page. I just built off of that…with what if’s. Also, Look at the artist, what if, rendition by Olof Rockner on page 3 of this thread.

Even your stating the object are balloons tied to together is a “what if”.

If you listen to Corbell (and I’m definitely not his biggest fan) ……..he states that the object was “invisible” to the naked eye…..to the personnel there at the base. The only way it was seen ….was by the sensor cameras…I.e. thermal….the object wasn’t even viewable by the mobile NV goggles given to the personal to search for the thing.

What balloons are invisible to the naked eye even at night….surely at least an outline of it should be seen even if they were clear balloons.

As for balloons/decorations tied together……I suppose it’s as good as any speculation so far……

But if that’s your conclusion….fine….we all have opinions.

So if it is balloons/decorations……….then it should be testable by repeatability? True?

Go buy some balloons/decorations…tie them together and duplicate what the video shows.

Should be simple critical thinking….right?

Remember that this object floated, drifted……for quite a few minutes……in a low altitude horizontal trajectory…not to mention that they also submerged in water for about 17 according to Corbell, and then rose from the water only to increase in altitude, vertically, in roughly a 45 degree angle.

So back to proving your balloon theory……once you have your balloons/decorations (possibly streamers) …..all tied together…….with your camera at the ready……release them into the air and video record it taking off…….

Now just as seen in the Corbell video… for your test purposes…you going to need a horizontal wind for some lengths of minutes….

Do we know what the winds were at the base…..we do not, not that I’m aware of.

Pretty much you’ll find that when you release your helium filled test balloons…..they will float, drift vertically, perhaps at some angle….but rise vertically…they will. Not horizontally for a length of time like the object in the video….I’ll bet

Imo…..critically thinking……balloons they are not.

Horizontally Propelled invisible balloons being pushed by a propulsion unit (source)….

Now there’s another what if…..😉

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Relax Ophi....I've questioned your critical thinking before and you werent half as uppity lol.
Fortunately Mick West seems to have an explanation that seems more likely than ID jellyfish propulsion units.

originally posted by: BeardensBeard
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Relax Ophi....I've questioned your critical thinking before and you werent half as uppity lol.
Fortunately Mick West seems to have an explanation that seems more likely than ID jellyfish propulsion units.

You’ve questioned me before?

Judging by your stats…..what was your username before the Oct…ATS Matrix Glitch that booted off alot of members?

I haven’t had my morning Latte yet….

Mick West goes South sometimes…..for instance (and he may have removed it out of embarrassment) he initially presented the jellyfish UAP as the chandelier UAP for his followers to dissect before the UFO Revolution aired…..he went off of the trailer…..that’s how meticulous he isn’t. What a goof 😆

He’s going to be one of the first ones taken when the alien invasion happens 😆

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

LySergic posted it in one of my threads. I thought I attributed in this thread but I guess it was another ATS jellyfish thread.

At any rate, I found the exact second of the released video for comparison. A split second before or after, the screen shot I took it is better rendered but was unable to capture it on my iPad. this the image LySergic had. I’m not on my laptop or Mac and my video shuttle cock is packed and probably sent to the Philippines.

As to bird poop. That is ridiculous. There are three videos (two released) with the camera panning around and moving in and out to different focal lengths. Definitely not bird poop.

Balloons is possible but unlikely as there is a video of it going into and out of the water. They can get a lock on balloons according to operators, and according to all testimony they could not get a lock on this object and even took the equipment apart looking for fault because they could not lock, so unlikely (but remotely possible) it is balloons.

I went through every second of both released videos as close to frame by frame as I could and the above post has the best contrast results and clearest image I could acquire.

Yes other systems and artists might render it different but this one is a faithful and honest. Compare to the video in TMZ. I purposefully posted the exact second in the screen shot. Go look for yourself. This represents the clearest and best of all renderings I’ve seen. Got better shot? Wonderful! Let’s see it. Almost all of us on ATS are working in good faith analyzing this.

We are going on 3rd hand accounts and doing the best we can. The debunkers on this one are the ones operating in the worst faith. My initial was bird poop until I spent HOURs going through frame by frame. This is best I could find, present yours.

a reply to: pianopraze

In case anyone is interested, I found a source for the enhanced image on Reddit. The redditer doesn't say how it was done.

www.reddit.com...

Also, there have been other attempts. Again, from Reddit, this time with an explanation.



www.reddit.com...

a reply to: pianopraze

I’m in agreement with this ….

Almost all of us on ATS are working in good faith analyzing this. We are going on 3rd hand accounts and doing the best we can.

🍻
👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
Pretty much you’ll find that when you release your helium filled test balloons…..they will float, drift vertically, perhaps at some angle….but rise vertically…they will. Not horizontally for a length of time like the object in the video….I’ll bet

The buoyancy of a group of balloon depends on the density of the whole group, so even if one helium balloon will go up, a bunch of balloons with some things attached may not.

If there's a horizontal wind (most winds close to the ground are horizontal) then the group of balloons will move horizontally for as long as the wind remains and as long as the density of the group of balloons as a whole and the density of the air around it are more or less the same.

PS: think of hot air balloons, they can go up, horizontally and down by adjusting the density of the whole system.

a reply to: ArMaP

If third video is real it went into water for 17 minutes, came out and shot off at a high rate of speed.

That would make it impossible to be balloon.

So would multiple testimonies that the system could not get a lock on this object.

So far every video that Jeremy has said he has was real. So until proven otherwise I will trust his statement that there is 3rd video of it entering and exiting water.

I understand how and why others would not.

a reply to: Encia22

That mostly lines up with LySergic’ s.

I thought it was one eye drone like thing when I first saw it.

I can see LySergic’s could be profile view which would make it almost identical to this Reddit post. Looks like two arms and a face on both.

originally posted by: pianopraze

So far every video that Jeremy has said he has was real.

Does the fact he sat on an obvious video of flares (without attempting verification)- then released it as a UFO video not undermine your confidence somewhat?

a reply to: pianopraze

I'm not saying it was a group of balloons, I am saying that a group of balloons can do what we see in this video.

Edited to add a video that, supposedly, shows the object over the water, starting at the 2 minutes mark.