Being Banned From A States Ballot

a reply to: JinMI

What was the start date of Davis' trial?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Where is running for President mentioned in either of those Amendments?

They're baiting you threadbarer. They understand all of this even if they cant accept it.

Best thing would be to just stop posting abvout this until higher courts confirm it. But even then, they'll find some excuse how even higher court doesnt know what they doing. No court, no law, no constitution is good enough if it goes against King Trump.

Resistance if futile. I'm beginning to get this. Not a lot of reason here.

a reply to: elevatedone

I did answer you with my first two posts. If a person does not meet the requirements to hold an office, then a state has obligation to include on a ballot. In fact it is their obligation to omit that person from the ballot.

originally posted by: matafuchs

This is where we are at on this argument. On one side....those who believe the Progressive Media. On the other, those who do not. It is soooo easy to see. Go to MSNBC.com. There will be 8 to 9 bylines for Trump. One article talking about how great Biden is.

Donald Trump did not lead an insurrection. If he was a dictator he would have taken over the House. The House stopped longer when the dude pulled the fire alarm than it did on 1/6. The certification did not happen on 1/7...or 1/10....it happened within hours of calling for it.

Are you all ready for COVID 24?

When all these illegal attempts at removing Trump from the ballots fail, they will fall back on Covid 24 for sure.
After all, Covid 19 worked flawlessly for them to commit election fraud the last time.

originally posted by: SharpyMoyron

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Where is running for President mentioned in either of those Amendments?

They're baiting you threadbarer. They understand all of this even if they cant accept it.

Best thing would be to just stop posting abvout this until higher courts confirm it. But even then, they'll find some excuse how even higher court doesnt know what they doing. No court, no law, no constitution is good enough if it goes against King Trump.

Resistance if futile. I'm beginning to get this. Not a lot of reason here.

That won’t be the end , when the Supreme Court strikes it down you’ll be crying still

originally posted by: Enduro

originally posted by: SharpyMoyron

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Where is running for President mentioned in either of those Amendments?

They're baiting you threadbarer. They understand all of this even if they cant accept it.

Best thing would be to just stop posting abvout this until higher courts confirm it. But even then, they'll find some excuse how even higher court doesnt know what they doing. No court, no law, no constitution is good enough if it goes against King Trump.

Resistance if futile. I'm beginning to get this. Not a lot of reason here.

That won’t be the end , when the Supreme Court strikes it down you’ll be crying still

Sure thing. Keep telling yourself that.

a reply to: Threadbarer

No,

Let's pretend this isn't about Trump and Biden.

The candidate meets all requirements to be on the Ballot, the other party just wants them off.

Go.

originally posted by: SharpyMoyron

originally posted by: Enduro

originally posted by: SharpyMoyron

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Where is running for President mentioned in either of those Amendments?

They're baiting you threadbarer. They understand all of this even if they cant accept it.

Best thing would be to just stop posting abvout this until higher courts confirm it. But even then, they'll find some excuse how even higher court doesnt know what they doing. No court, no law, no constitution is good enough if it goes against King Trump.

Resistance if futile. I'm beginning to get this. Not a lot of reason here.

That won’t be the end , when the Supreme Court strikes it down you’ll be crying still

Sure thing. Keep telling yourself that.

Will you come back and apologize when Trump gets elected or will you leave the country with all the other hurt feelz Liberals that are threatening to leave when it happens?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

What was the start date of Davis' trial?

Indicted May 8th, 1866
Arraigned May 13th 1867
Trial postponed until March 1868 due to Justice Chase travel (who would assume a seat on SCOTUS later)

a reply to: JinMI

Running for office is a privilege, not a right. If it was a right, how could it be denied because of age or location of birth?

a reply to: SharpyMoyron

Resistance if futile. I'm beginning to get this. Not a lot of reason here.

I've given you a few opportunities to back up your bluster with tangible proof.


You've chosen not to, therefore we are to regard your attacks as nothing more as projection....

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Running for office is a privilege, not a right. If it was a right, how could it be denied because of age or location of birth?

Now you're trying to change the argument.

Liberty, not right.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Running for office is a privilege, not a right. If it was a right, how could it be denied because of age or location of birth?

Owning a firearm is a right. f it was a right, how could it be denied because of age?

a reply to: Enduro

There's a very good chance it gets struck down. But it's not going to be struck down on the grounds all of you seem to assume. It's ultimately going to come down to a question of states' rights. Do states have the right to disqualify a person running for federal office?

a reply to: Threadbarer

sent you a pm

a reply to: JinMI

Define liberty.

2 Faced Irony

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

Where in the 14th Amendment does it say a conviction is required?

Due process under the 5th Amendment is required. 😃

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

Define liberty.

Thank you so much for asking, not that it will change your mind but will provide a through line for many folks trying to understand this

The term “liberty” appears in the due process clauses of both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. As used in the Constitution, liberty means freedom from arbitrary and unreasonable restraint upon an individual. Freedom from restraint refers to more than just physical restraint, but also the freedom to act according to one's own will. On numerous occasions the Supreme Court has sought to explain what liberty means and what it encompasses. For example:

Wex

I do enjoy it when you ask the questions that tank your own positions.

a reply to: elevatedone

A political ideology is attempting to infringe on the rights of another political ideology to run for office.