It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Congress can make law after law
Congress' failure to pass any meaningful immigration reform has stretched to more than two decades. Over and over, attempts have collapsed — including bipartisan efforts and those with strong presidential backing. Instead, most changes on immigration have been achieved only through funding bills, small provisions in other legislation, regulations and executive authority.
With Congress sitting on the sidelines, presidents are forced to turn to existing laws and their executive powers to cobble together something that works, said Tom Jawetz, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. They are also limited by how much money in existing budgets can be legally shifted because they'd need congressional action to boost spending or reassign dollars already designated for other purposes.
Troops need to be on the border. That's the responsibility of the POTUS ...
originally posted by: LeXoXeL
So because there's a "good chance" that a Mexican near the border is illegal, all Mexicans near the border are going to be asked for ID? What happens if they aren't near the border? If the assumption is illegals all hang out near the border after crossing it, then why does the whole state need new laws? Sounds like it's going to turn into a guilty until proven innocent, kinda a "driving while Mexican" as a reason to pull someone over thing.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Station27
It was his fault to begin with, so he's responsible for fixing the problem.
Please explain.
It wasn't Congress that undid all of Trump's laws, was it?
What laws? President don't make laws. They write executive orders.
And congress doesn't need to "change" the laws.
Congress writes laws. If you're unhappy with the law, that's on Congress.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Congress writes laws. If you're unhappy with the law, that's on Congress.
are you aware of the FACT that Biden reversed many of the working Trump policies as soon as he took over? Remain in Mexico sound like something you have heard before?
originally posted by: Station27
originally posted by: LeXoXeL
Ok, sure! You must be a Texan! I am curious though, how do YOU think these new laws will be enforced? Just how exactly is a state trooper going to determine whether someone is an "illegal" or not? Can you describe what an "illegal" looks like? What specific behaviors do "illegals" exhibit that would make them easy to target? Is there a field "legality" test they can administer?
I believe you're wrong on every count! That takes skill. I would say that the scenario you're proposing would be the least effective way of enforcing these new laws. It's my guess that with $40 million dollars to hire new state troopers, they'll probably more than likely be deployed right along the border - where the problem exists. Why put them anywhere else? Anywhere else would just allow some, (many, probably), to avoid being captured. If they stop them at the border, it will be quite easy to tell if they're legal citizens or not. Because I'm pretty sure that honest-to-goodness American citizens don't go wading across the Rio Grande all that often.
I'm unhappy because they're not being enforced.
It's not the job for congress to enforce the laws.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
"Congress' failure to pass any meaningful immigration reform has stretched to more than two decades.
originally posted by: LeXoXeL
So, state troopers are part of the US border patrol Rio Grande division? I learned something new today! I was under the impression that the local yokal state cops where not there to protect our borders, that is someone else's job. The average state trooper is Texas makes 58k -120k depending on experience. At 40 million is additional funding, that will gross roughly 540 troopers for 1 year @75k per year, 2 years gets ya only 280 new troopers, so on and so forth. The border of Texas and Mexico is roughly 1250 miles long. So 280 extra troopers is going to stop border crossings in 2 years?
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: LeXoXeL
Racism shouldn't hide in the shadows! What better way to make Texas white again than to make it illegal to be anything else.
That's absurd. This law helps protect Americans of all races. Illegals bring drugs and crime that harm Americans of all races. They flood hospitals and schools overwhelming them, burdening Americans of all races. And they are a drain upon the US taxpayers ... taxpayers of all races.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: LeXoXeL
Do you like the sex human trafficking that is going on at the border? do you like the child sex trafficking that is going on and making the US now number one on human trafficking?
Do you know that the biden admiration does not give two rat asses about children and human sex trafficking?
Do you know that the drug Cartel went for making millions on drugs and sex to making billions under biden?
Is that what you want and what you like?
What kind of person are you, are you defending the sex, drugs and child traffickers because that is what is going on at the border.
Never mind, no need to answer that one.
originally posted by: LeXoXeL
Sorry, I'm actually defending human beings who are not ALL DRUG TRAFFICKING AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING!
originally posted by: Station27
originally posted by: LeXoXeL
So, state troopers are part of the US border patrol Rio Grande division? I learned something new today! I was under the impression that the local yokal state cops where not there to protect our borders, that is someone else's job. The average state trooper is Texas makes 58k -120k depending on experience. At 40 million is additional funding, that will gross roughly 540 troopers for 1 year @75k per year, 2 years gets ya only 280 new troopers, so on and so forth. The border of Texas and Mexico is roughly 1250 miles long. So 280 extra troopers is going to stop border crossings in 2 years?
It doesn't sound like you actually read the OP. The answers to your questions (if you're actually looking for answers and are not just here to derail the thread), can be found in the OP. If Governor Abbott says he will use State Troopers for this job, and you don't like it, take it up with him. I don't have any authority to do anything about it. You were aware of that and not just trolling, right? I know you're not just trolling - you really care about this issue of illegal immigrants flooding into America. Amirite?
At an estimated total price tag of $116 billion annually, Jerome lists the welfare costs that result from those who illegally enter the United States:
Consider health care: More than seven in 10 illegal immigrants do not have health insurance. When they get sick, they frequently turn to emergency rooms, which legally cannot turn patients away. The cost of that care is ultimately passed on to government programs and everyone with a private insurance plan. Americans pay about $18 billion a year to provide free and subsidized health care for illegal immigrants.
The same goes for welfare and food assistance programs. Eighty-nine percent of households headed by illegal immigrant parents utilize at least one welfare program. These families draw nearly $6 billion in welfare benefits per year.
Children from illegal immigrant households also strain our public-school system. Nearly a quarter of students in U.S. public schools now speak a language other than English at home – that share has more than doubled since 1980. Taxpayers shell out roughly $1.6 billion a year to teach these kids English.
The 2022 SIPP indicates that 54 percent of households headed by immigrants — naturalized citizens, legal residents, and illegal immigrants — used one or more major welfare program. This compares to 39 percent for U.S.-born households.
he rate is 59 percent for non-citizen households (e.g. green card holders and illegal immigrants).
Compared to households headed by the U.S.-born, immigrant-headed households have especially high use of food programs (36 percent vs. 25 percent for the U.S.-born), Medicaid (37 percent vs. 25 percent for the U.S.-born), and the Earned Income Tax Credit (16 percent vs. 12 percent for the U.S.-born).
Our best estimate is that 59 percent of households headed by illegal immigrants, also called the undocumented, use at least one major program. We have no evidence this is due to fraud. Among legal immigrants we estimate the rate is 52 percent.
Most new legal immigrants are barred from most programs, as are illegal immigrants, but this has a modest impact primarily because: 1) Immigrants can receive benefits on behalf of U.S.-born children; 2) the bar does not apply to all programs, nor does it apply to non-citizen children in some cases; 3) most legal immigrants have lived here long enough to qualify for welfare; 4) some states provide welfare to otherwise ineligible immigrants on their own; 5) by naturalizing, immigrants gain full welfare eligibility.