Radical Michigan Imam Calls for Muslims to Wage Jihad in US

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: KrustyKrab

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: KrustyKrab
a reply to: quintessentone

I've already researched this topic and I am correct in how their Bible is interpreted and misinterpreted to fit certain narratives

Really you’ve researched this? Then it shouldn’t be a problem with you giving us some interpretations. I’ll wait why you google away. If you’ve researched anything about the Quran, which I highly doubt, you’d know it’s not called a Bible🙄

It's their Bible, also known as an authoritative book on a particular subject, it still applies so let your pettiness slip through your fingers like water.

I've already offered what I know previously in this thread. Go back a reread it if you really want to know.

No it’s not their Bible, they don’t have a Bible. It’s like calling a cat a dog. So you don’t know about their so called interpretations, got it.

Let it go man, you are making yourself look a fool.

That’s rich🤣 You keep doing you boo.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2


I know. My emotional-support-badger is one of the retired Guantamo Badgers.

a reply to: Irishhaf
I agree but also I'm very shocked any American would take up for this inman guy they must just hate America so much they can't stand it.

originally posted by: Opossum19
a reply to: Irishhaf
I agree but also I'm very shocked any American would take up for this inman guy they must just hate America so much they can't stand it.

Nobody on this thread is taking up for this Imam, everyone here thinks he should be jailed and silenced. The fact that he can hide behind his constitution rights is the problem.

Well I think that we should all stop pretending that we have the power to figure any of this sort of thing out anymore. Let the badgers sort it out. They are God's beloved creature, and the badgerkind are wise in His ways. Has it not ever been so?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Opossum19
a reply to: Irishhaf
I agree but also I'm very shocked any American would take up for this inman guy they must just hate America so much they can't stand it.

Nobody on this thread is taking up for this Imam, everyone here thinks he should be jailed and silenced. The fact that he can hide behind his constitution rights is the problem.

It is funny how you change the meaning of words to obfuscate the discussion. Also, you don't see the unequil application of the laws you say protect this terrorist.

The Bible is the Bible. Jews have a Torah, Muslims have a Quran, Christians have a Bible. Bible is not a general term for holey book.

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Opossum19
a reply to: Irishhaf
I agree but also I'm very shocked any American would take up for this inman guy they must just hate America so much they can't stand it.

Nobody on this thread is taking up for this Imam, everyone here thinks he should be jailed and silenced. The fact that he can hide behind his constitution rights is the problem.

It is funny how you change the meaning of words to obfuscate the discussion. Also, you don't see the unequil application of the laws you say protect this terrorist

Actually I am one of the few rational discussers here that actually see how this Imam and other extremists in America can use their constitutional rights to get away with heinous acts which they know the laws will protect them.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Opossum19
a reply to: Irishhaf
I agree but also I'm very shocked any American would take up for this inman guy they must just hate America so much they can't stand it.

Nobody on this thread is taking up for this Imam, everyone here thinks he should be jailed and silenced. The fact that he can hide behind his constitution rights is the problem.

It is funny how you change the meaning of words to obfuscate the discussion. Also, you don't see the unequil application of the laws you say protect this terrorist

Actually I am one of the few rational discussers here that actually see how this Imam and other extremists in America can use their constitutional rights to get away with heinous acts which they know the laws will protect them.

You still don't see that it is not the laws but the law enforcers and judicial system being politicized that is the problem. Oh well, you see but are unable to comprehend.

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Opossum19
a reply to: Irishhaf
I agree but also I'm very shocked any American would take up for this inman guy they must just hate America so much they can't stand it.

Nobody on this thread is taking up for this Imam, everyone here thinks he should be jailed and silenced. The fact that he can hide behind his constitution rights is the problem.

It is funny how you change the meaning of words to obfuscate the discussion. Also, you don't see the unequil application of the laws you say protect this terrorist

Actually I am one of the few rational discussers here that actually see how this Imam and other extremists in America can use their constitutional rights to get away with heinous acts which they know the laws will protect them.

You still don't see that it is not the laws but the law enforcers and judicial system being politicized that is the problem. Oh well, you see but are unable to comprehend.

Supposedly the FBI is surveilling this guy, so the fact that they don't arrest him should tell us all that either they have nothing that will stand up in court or they need to keep this guy active to surveil others.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Opossum19
a reply to: Irishhaf
I agree but also I'm very shocked any American would take up for this inman guy they must just hate America so much they can't stand it.

Nobody on this thread is taking up for this Imam, everyone here thinks he should be jailed and silenced. The fact that he can hide behind his constitution rights is the problem.

It is funny how you change the meaning of words to obfuscate the discussion. Also, you don't see the unequil application of the laws you say protect this terrorist

Actually I am one of the few rational discussers here that actually see how this Imam and other extremists in America can use their constitutional rights to get away with heinous acts which they know the laws will protect them.

You still don't see that it is not the laws but the law enforcers and judicial system being politicized that is the problem. Oh well, you see but are unable to comprehend.

Supposedly the FBI is surveilling this guy, so the fact that they don't arrest him should tell us all that either they have nothing that will stand up in court or they need to keep this guy active to surveil others.

It tells me they can't find convencing evidence to make the charges stick in the current politicalized judicial system. Or, the FBI is just using him to justify their existance.without a threat. Why pay for the FBI if they don't have a threat to work with? Just like all the mass shooters that were under investigation before hand by the FBI.

Again corrupt system not bad laws.

originally posted by: quintessentoneThe fact that he can hide behind his constitution rights is the problem.

I don't know whether the Constitution guarantees any right to incite violence or treason.

Freedom of speech does not give people the right to conspire to kill people. Freedom of speech gives you the right to voice your opinion but not to incite violence against other Americans who are also citizens. This has been understood long ago when I was young, but somehow the liberals I think changed the definition of the law so they could cover up the actions of their demonstrations gone wild. But this protection from prosecution only seems to protect the liberals and progressives now.

originally posted by: Solvedit2

originally posted by: quintessentoneThe fact that he can hide behind his constitution rights is the problem.

I don't know whether the Constitution guarantees any right to incite violence or treason.

The FBI would know and since they have not arrested him, what do we make of that?

a reply to: quintessentone

The FBI in the present day also entrap people into shooting up schools, consider parents to be "potential terrorists", and routinely harass conservatives for speech, so their opinion and actions are irrelevant. They are political police first and foremost, which they have always been. Ask any civil rights leader from 60s.

originally posted by: quintessentone
if this Imam was responsible for inciting the beheading and the police knew it then this Imam would be arrested and jailed,.

Obviously not. The reports are that the Imam was the inspiration. The cops must have found the Imams crap on the perps laptop or someone told the cops the perp listened to him, something like that. The cops wouldn't just make it up out of thin air. Obviously there is something wrong with the justice system in this country. Why are you arguing for the Imam and refusing to accept that people listen to him and are inspired by him?

a reply to: quintessentone

As I stated previously, the majority of the Muslin community that do not follow the extremist interpretation of their Bible can silence him in many ways.

That shows a naive and poor understanding of Islamic teaching and culture.
The majority of Muslims quitely acquiesce to the teachings and instructions of their local Imam.

The very fact that local Muslims have not condemned him or deplatformed him must surely show you the influence and support these 'extremists' have in their communities.

a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

Pretty easy to hit those numbers when all you post is bs nonsense and then consistently attack other users for calling you out and making you look as dumb as you truly are.


But some users in here are content with defending the "rights" of terrorists to threaten the US, and we are not allowed to say anything about it. But, if it were the other way around and it was their way of life being threatened by some nut jub, they would be all up in arms about wanting him arrested or shot to make sure they are safe.

a reply to: quintessentone

Ah yes, the cries of someone who hates being challenged on things they only claim they did.


Defending terrorism must be a full time job for you.

www.ala.org...#:~:text=Only%20that%20expression%20that%20is,true%20threats%2C%20and%20fighting%20words.

The categories of unprotected speech include obscenity, child pornography, defamatory speech, false advertising, true threats, and fighting words.[/quote]


Seems this is not covered under freedom of speech. But continue on with whatever narrative or agenda you feel is worth looking a fool over.

a reply to: quintessentone

Now your behavior makes sense. You're taking the role of the one disagreeing with the rest, as so often and almost exclusively.

Man you can be proud standing up for terrorists, you're one devil of a tough guy righting the wrongs in this world.

/sarcastic applause

a reply to: FlyersFan

Another daft arsed b@w'bag trying to cause trouble to further his own obvious agenda and cause.

Most people of the Muslim persuasion in both our respective nations simply wish to get on with their day like the rest of us.

I hope he slips and falls on a rusty bacon-covered dil@o.