It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That is true and by doing that they just watch when their religious brothers and sisters wage a holy war on every other religion.
Islam is law for them and one of these laws says you can not go after your fellow muslims but you are allowed to be insidious, lying, tricking infidels and people from other religions, if it helps the cause of Islam.
Read up on Islam and then try telling me what I wrote was not 100% correct.
Its hardly a peaceable person's job to intervene where ars@holes and religious zealots are concerned.
Im sure you dont go about trying to rehabilitate every Jesus freak you come across with a billboard telling us the end is nigh.
I don't seem to recall replying to you here in this thread or calling into question anything you wrote.
I dont need to read up on Islam or Muslims, i grew up with them, and the majority are just like you and me, simply paying lip service to a religion given to them by their parents.
But again they are a small minority as opposed to any sort of majority.
Oh it is, it is called civil courage. Why would I defend Jesus when I am not even Christian? Did you just assume my religion lol?
Why does that matter, do you have the exclusive right to reply to random people? Why even formulate a reply then?
The majority in your vincinity, in your western country. Have you been to places like Egypt yet? Or any other Muslim arabic country? Do you know how women are treated there?
Exactly my point: The majority stays silent because their religion tells them to put other Muslims before the rest of the infidels. It's built into the religion. So the majority always has the excuse to not act on their terrorist brothers and sisters, because religion is law for them.
That's what you need to understand. I am not talking about "lipservice Muslims". Did you just call the majority of Muslim doing lip service? That's ignorant AF.
We can agree to disagree.
originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Calling for aggression and death of others is not protected by free speech.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Calling for aggression and death of others is not protected by free speech.
Exactly
originally posted by: PorkChop96
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Calling for aggression and death of others is not protected by free speech.
Exactly
Thank you for finally realizing, and admitting, how wrong you were all day yesterday.
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
Wrong
You kept calling for his "community" to silence him, and saying that anyone else who wanted him silenced were infringing on his 1st amendment right, calling for him to be "de-platformed", and not condemning his action as a terroristic threat.
Never once did you say he needed to be jailed.
The only bias here is yours when it comes to being proven wrong by certain members here.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlongCameaSpider
Calling for aggression and death of others is not protected by free speech.
Exactly, so why is this Imam free to call for aggression and death of others? The FBI may be letting this guy remain active for a wider surveillance of homeland terrorism, I can't see any other explanation.
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
Since you still have yet to answer from yesterday when I asked you a million times, where is your proof that he was never arrested?
You are the only one that was defending him, everyone else here was condemning his actions. I'd say your transparency is the real issue here. But you don't want to see it so oh well
hiding behind his legal rights
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
Sure, keep avoiding the question you can't answer. We see you bud
Not trying to label anything, we all know who and what you are.
hiding behind his legal rights
There is no legal right to what he said, or did you completely skip over what I posted earlier. Wait, of course you did.