House Speaker Johnson wants to blur January 6 footage to protect Capitol rioters

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

In researching electors for another thread I realize how important a role Pence played and the fact Pence claimed before that day he was going to count the alternate set of electors from the States that had shown serious and massive election fraud.

I don't know what kind of research you've been doing, but according to Pence's book, Pence was not even going to show up on Jan 6th, which gives credence to the rumor that Grassley was going to preside. Then Pence's son convinced him to do his constitutional duty, because they both took the same oath.

He changed his mind after he surfaced from the rat tunnels they all went to hiding within.

Where are you getting this stuff?

Imo Pelosi who orchestrated the insurrection that day is guilty of seditious conspiracy.

Yeah? Okay. LOL

originally posted by: FarmerSimulation

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: worldstarcountry

It was when Nancy Pelosi was speaker. They would not even Acknowledge the federal courthouse attack, where people were actually committing property and violent crimes against a federal institution in Oakland. Now that Oakland federal courthouse attack, that was definitely a riot.

I believe you may have even supported those rioters back then and chastised POTUS Trump for deploying federal law enforcement to protect it.

I doubt that I commented on that incident. But I might have, as I am against using the military against US citizens. I never called for the military to be used against the Jan 6th protestors.

But I must ask, did Speaker Pelosi threaten to obstruct justice on behalf of said rioters? That's my issue with Johnson.

In researching electors for another thread I realize how important a role Pence played and the fact Pence claimed before that day he was going to reject the electors sent from the States that had shown serious and massive election fraud until a 10 day audit period was done.
He changed his mind after he surfaced from the rat tunnels they all went to hiding within.
Imo Pelosi who orchestrated the insurrection that day is guilty of seditious conspiracy.
You have to wonder what she said or did to sway Pence that day.
Traitors to the Republic they are.

Was Nancy Pelosi's laptop computer (stolen during the protest) ever found?

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: FarmerSimulation

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: worldstarcountry

It was when Nancy Pelosi was speaker. They would not even Acknowledge the federal courthouse attack, where people were actually committing property and violent crimes against a federal institution in Oakland. Now that Oakland federal courthouse attack, that was definitely a riot.

I believe you may have even supported those rioters back then and chastised POTUS Trump for deploying federal law enforcement to protect it.

I doubt that I commented on that incident. But I might have, as I am against using the military against US citizens. I never called for the military to be used against the Jan 6th protestors.

But I must ask, did Speaker Pelosi threaten to obstruct justice on behalf of said rioters? That's my issue with Johnson.

In researching electors for another thread I realize how important a role Pence played and the fact Pence claimed before that day he was going to reject the electors sent from the States that had shown serious and massive election fraud until a 10 day audit period was done.
He changed his mind after he surfaced from the rat tunnels they all went to hiding within.
Imo Pelosi who orchestrated the insurrection that day is guilty of seditious conspiracy.
You have to wonder what she said or did to sway Pence that day.
Traitors to the Republic they are.

Was Nancy Pelosi's laptop computer (stolen during the protest) ever found?

Not that I am aware of.
Unless you count the spaceforce seen possibly carrying it out of the capitol that day.
There was some strange counter story for it about some lady that was able to whisk it away all the way to Alaska.
But that story was so unbelievable I think it was given up on as a good way to explain it away

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

In researching electors for another thread I realize how important a role Pence played and the fact Pence claimed before that day he was going to count the alternate set of electors from the States that had shown serious and massive election fraud.

I don't know what kind of research you've been doing, but according to Pence's book, Pence was not even going to show up on Jan 6th, which gives credence to the rumor that Grassley was going to preside. Then Pence's son convinced him to do his constitutional duty, because they both took the same oath.

He changed his mind after he surfaced from the rat tunnels they all went to hiding within.

Where are you getting this stuff?

Imo Pelosi who orchestrated the insurrection that day is guilty of seditious conspiracy.

Yeah? Okay. LOL

Wow.
The traitor wrote a book you say.
Did anyone read it?
Is he going to be the next president?
Have you heard what Johnheretohelp, the whistle-blower has to say about Pence?

He was as much credibility to the American people as any other insurrectionist that once held power but now puts his hope in Nancy's Jan6 committee

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Wow.
The traitor wrote a book you say.
Did anyone read it?

It's all over the MSM. Talking heads are reading excerpts and lawyers and political science experts are discussing it. Pence is on a book tour and doing appearances and interviews.

Have you heard what Johnheretohelp, the whistle-blower has to say about Pence?

No, I haven't. Post it. Link it. Please

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

I prefer to hear what they have to say under oath. These books are as much fantasy and fiction as they are reality.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Wow.
The traitor wrote a book you say.
Did anyone read it?

It's all over the MSM. Talking heads are reading excerpts and lawyers and political science experts are discussing it. Pence is on a book tour and doing appearances and interviews.

Have you heard what Johnheretohelp, the whistle-blower has to say about Pence?

No, I haven't. Post it. Link it. Please

This will be just about the most flammable info you can ever read.
It is either the biggest and most complicated cointel pro operation I have ever seen to discredit the Jan 6 exposure movement or it is Intel.
He was prosecuted for "lying" about some really weird stuff about child trafficking when he was supposedly working undercover in a pornshop. He plead and admitted he made it all up in a plea deal.

But all the other stuff which includes Lin Wood and Stew Peter's never gets touched or prosecuted for?

Nothing makes sense about it.
The defamation lawsuits should be 490 pages full of claims and lawsuits.
The leads go very deep.
You can start here with maps and the Lin Wood transcripts.

politicalmoonshine.com...
Real or really deep fake.
You be the judge.
It sure doesn't paint Pence in a good light.
If it was Trump the defa.ation lawsuits would have happened

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

I prefer to hear what they have to say under oath. These books are as much fantasy and fiction as they are reality.

I agree 100%
Book deals in politics today are payoffs.
Nobody buys them and they get paid huge money upfront.
Ad credible as Hunter Biden selling artwork for millions.

Who believes that stuff is legitimate?