House Speaker Johnson wants to blur January 6 footage to protect Capitol rioters

a reply to: worldstarcountry

It was when Nancy Pelosi was speaker. They would not even Acknowledge the federal courthouse attack, where people were actually committing property and violent crimes against a federal institution in Oakland. Now that Oakland federal courthouse attack, that was definitely a riot.

I believe you may have even supported those rioters back then and chastised POTUS Trump for deploying federal law enforcement to protect it.

I doubt that I commented on that incident. But I might have, as I am against using the military against US citizens. I never called for the military to be used against the Jan 6th protestors.

But I must ask, did Speaker Pelosi threaten to obstruct justice on behalf of said rioters? That's my issue with Johnson.

a reply to: Sookiechacha
Possibly. Does ordering city attorneys to not prosecute, and having their mayor order the police to stand down, does any of that qualify??

a reply to: worldstarcountry

Does ordering city attorneys to not prosecute, and having their mayor order the police to stand down, does any of that qualify??

Do you have a link? I'm not educated on that event, Pelosi's response or your assertion that she obstructed justice.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

There was no " Riot "

Then why does Mike Johnson need to blur faces?

To protec the liberal provacateurs and make sure the election irregularities were never challenged?

a reply to: Sookiechacha
Well she was a California rep withh lots of power. I cannot say for certain because I need to find that thread. I remember her certainly commenting on the mattter.

a reply to: worldstarcountry

TextI cannot say for certain because I need to find that thread. I remember her certainly commenting on the mattter.

Right. I don't remember the thread at all. But I found these:

www.foxnews.com...
abc7news.com...
www.courthousenews.com...
www.ktvu.com...

But I can't find anything on any comments made by Pelosi.

Makes sense...

The bamn people have shown they are willing to do anything and everything to further their agenda, why allow regular people to out citizens that either did nothing, or most likely already dealt with the fed over what they did.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Annee

You're filmed everywhere you go, unless your House blows up and sends you into the Stratosphere. Did they ever find the guy who blew his Virginia house up last night? I saw him go up, but not come down.

This was a political event.

Unless you want to claim they were just walking down the street to get some air.

Political event or not, the cameras at the U.S. Capitol are always running. Same with the White House. That's why the FBI and Secret Service are LYING when they say "We don't know who brought the COCAINE into the White House...Honest!"

Which has what to do with this thread?

Confirming your statement that cameras are everywhere.

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

There was no " Riot "

Then why does Mike Johnson need to blur faces?

To protec the liberal provacateurs and make sure the election irregularities were never challenged?

We'll see the first vestiges of violence and the faces behind it. The FBI is under enough heat. They wouldn't hesitate to tell Johnson to blur the faces, or else.

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

There was no " Riot "

Then why does Mike Johnson need to blur faces?

To protec the liberal provacateurs and make sure the election irregularities were never challenged?

We'll see the first vestiges of violence and the faces behind it. The FBI is under enough heat. They wouldn't hesitate to tell Johnson to blur the faces, or else.

When diplomats like Rosa can spy for another country for 40 years without getting caught you know the system is rigged. No matter how many times politicians like Pelosi, Clinton, VP Biden got caught their were never any consequences.
With the HOBBS act and RICO any politician is susceptable to be blackballed if they don't follow the political 'plan' and Trump has served as an example to politicians everywhere; 'you will not cross the line or our alphabet agencies will destroy you'.
J6 brought on new methods of control for the American citizens; none of them were millionaires that could afford to fight Big Government, and Trump was/is an example of how our lives will be destroyed and how we will be punished for supporting a non-sanctioned candidate.
Sadly, I think the loopholes that allowed Trump to win have been closed.

SPAM

a reply to: Mahogani

This guy obviously doesnt have control of his "Johnson". What a frigging lunitic yet why did the Democrats vote him in the 1st place? For fodder?

Same as Trump who isnt in control of his joy stick.


IMO the FBI raided Trumps Mar A Largo to secure Trumps Joy Stick as he has a lift and I aint talking shoes. I can only imagine if Iran got ahold of it as it would be a "prepare to launch moment"

originally posted by: Mahogani
“We’re going through a methodical process of releasing them as quickly as we can,” Johnson said. “As you know, we have to blur some of the faces of persons who participated in events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ and to have other, you know, concerns and problems.”

Yeah, that's a big problem, because it will make identifying the identities of all of the cops and feds that were instigating the criminal acts that occurred that day.

Thanks for bringing this to our attention.

I would have left an extra (smelly) thing for her!!!


a reply to: FarmerSimulation

This really stinks to high heavens, makes me instantly not trust Johnson. Since these tapes have been combed through by the FBI already the only reason to blur faces is so some online detectives cant do a basic check of who got arrested and who didnt from the identifiable faces and then see if they can spot some agents. The same way Gateway pundit did.

a reply to: 777Vader

What authority will investigate and confirm this to be the case? The more years pass, the smaller the chance of finding evidence of our government setting up violence on 1.6.2021.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: worldstarcountry

It was when Nancy Pelosi was speaker. They would not even Acknowledge the federal courthouse attack, where people were actually committing property and violent crimes against a federal institution in Oakland. Now that Oakland federal courthouse attack, that was definitely a riot.

I believe you may have even supported those rioters back then and chastised POTUS Trump for deploying federal law enforcement to protect it.

I doubt that I commented on that incident. But I might have, as I am against using the military against US citizens. I never called for the military to be used against the Jan 6th protestors.

But I must ask, did Speaker Pelosi threaten to obstruct justice on behalf of said rioters? That's my issue with Johnson.

In researching electors for another thread I realize how important a role Pence played and the fact Pence claimed before that day he was going to reject the electors sent from the States that had shown serious and massive election fraud until a 10 day audit period was done.
He changed his mind after he surfaced from the rat tunnels they all went to hiding within.
Imo Pelosi who orchestrated the insurrection that day is guilty of seditious conspiracy.
You have to wonder what she said or did to sway Pence that day.
Traitors to the Republic they are.

originally posted by: FarmerSimulation
the fact Pence claimed before that day he was going to count the alternate set of electors from the States that had shown serious and massive election fraud.

Do you have a link to that claim?

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: FarmerSimulation
the fact Pence claimed before that day he was going to count the alternate set of electors from the States that had shown serious and massive election fraud.

Do you have a link to that claim?

Certainly.
I refined my claim a little in an edit to be honest and fair here.
I may have mistaken a little implying too much.

www.npr.org... prml&f=139482413