House Speaker Johnson wants to blur January 6 footage to protect Capitol rioters

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Sure, why not?

I mean if the J6 commission was permitted....

The Jan 6th Committee did no such thing.

The Speaker of the House is giving the appearance that obstruction of justice is a patriotic thing to do. I say "appearance" because we know that the DOJ already has these tapes. So, Mike Johnson is trying to make obstruction of justice cool!

originally posted by: Mahogani

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Mahogani

There was no " Riot " No Matter How Hard you Keep Crying about it like a Little Girl .......

Insurrection, rebellion, whatever you want to call it.

Yes, it absolutely didn't happen and that is why faces need to be blurred to protect all the insurrectionists, who, of course, weren't there.

Can you please define what the "insurrection" was, why it's considered an "insurrection", and why those whom are held without trial are being held?

ETA: I know this will be nitpicked to oblivion, so the first question is reliant on the following two.

originally posted by: Disgusted123
The Republican Party, the Party of Law and Order is no longer.

It's the Party of Trump and his criminals.

If you did nothing wrong, why in the world would you have to have your face covered Mr. Johnson?

Weren't these tapes supposed to show how everyone was obeying the law? WELL show me then.

But we all know, that won't happen, because I know what I saw the day it happened, and gaslighting only works on the weak minded.

Everyone here, enjoy denying your ignorance, while you wallow in it.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Sure, why not?

I mean if the J6 commission was permitted....

The Jan 6th Committee did no such thing.

The Speaker of the House is giving the appearance that obstruction of justice is a patriotic thing to do. I say "appearance" because we know that the DOJ already has these tapes. So, Mike Johnson is trying to make obstruction of justice cool!

No?

So the press for the thousands of hours of extra footage is only in the public's imagination?

Hilarious Sookie...even for you.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

There was no " Riot "

Then why does Mike Johnson need to blur faces?

Just stop it. We all know you support how every other rioter out there seems to wear face masks to conceal their identity. You just obsfucate it by saying they are protesters. Speaker Johnson is actually correct in this. You and the OP BOTH ignore a simple fact. No one is guilty till they have a trial and are proven guilty. Privacy laws and all that. But you approve of the political persecution of those of your opposition. In case you forgot it has only been during Trumps administration you approved of mask wearing rioting. It was the laziest rationale too, to protest during a quarantine. Never mind that was never approved of by anyone till it was a bludgeon against Trump.

a reply to: JinMI

No?

What?

So the press for the thousands of hours of extra footage is only in the public's imagination?

Who is pressing for thousands of extra hours of footage? I've seen enough. There's no amount of footage that's going erase the footage that's already out there.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

There was no " Riot "

Then why does Mike Johnson need to blur faces?

Then why did he not use the word riot?
Where did he say there was a riot?
Did the op lie and MJ not use the word riot?
Why would the op lie and say he did?
I have to admit I had never seen anything like it.
A million or more people picked up their own trash.
Can we verify this was coordinated in preceding correspondence that they would be so sinister in picking up all the trash in order to cover their tracks?
That's probably why they blurred their faces as that is obviously breaking the rules of the United Waste Disposal Union in D.C.

a reply to: hangedman13

Speaker Johnson is actually correct in this.

So you think the Speaker of the House telling the public that he intends to obstruct justice is the correct thing for him to do? No need to answer, it's a rhetorical question.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Who is pressing for thousands of extra hours of footage? I've seen enough. There's no amount of footage that's going erase the footage that's already out there.

Very well put. Very well put indeed.


No amount of fact will sway you from your truth.


Now put on your mask and vote blue, no matter who and thank you for your service.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Are you really asserting that there was no "rioting" done at the capitol on Jan 6th?

a reply to: JinMI

No amount of fact will sway you from your truth.

What truth is that?

All these types of events are filmed -- one way or another.

If anyone going to these types of events has an issue being filmed -- they should stay home.

It makes zero sense to blur faces in this crowd.

You're right -- who is he trying to protect?

a reply to: Disgusted123

The Republican Party, the Party of Law and Order is no longer. It's the Party of Trump and his criminals.

Are you aware that a huge slice of the Republican Party is anti-Trump? From former prez George W, to around 250 Republicans, at every level, from Congress to the judiciary. From current and former cabinet-level people, not to mention state governors and state congress people. So it's hardly "The Party of Trump".

But we all know, that won't happen, because I know what I saw the day it happened, and gaslighting only works on the weak minded.

Wasn't this a Jen Psaki talking point?



Not the Party of Trump

originally posted by: Annee
All these types of events are filmed -- one way or another.

If anyone going to these types of events has an issue being filmed -- they should stay home.

It makes zero sense to blur faces in this crowd.

You're right -- who is he trying to protect?

Johnson does not want us to see the faces of the people who initiated acts of violence against the building and against other human beings. It's likely the 200+ FBI "helpers" intentionally sparked the pockets of riots.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Mahogani

This is obviously a threat to democracy.

Someone needs to loot a few stores and burn down fast-food restaurants in peaceful protest.

Shhh, don't give them any ideas.

a reply to: WeMustCare

Ah, so Johnson is protecting the identity of the FBI agents who (allegedly) incited the riot in the first place. I see.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Are you really asserting that there was no "rioting" done at the capitol on Jan 6th?

I say for an absolute fact.
They picked up their trash.
If they had time to multitasking by rioting also I would have to at least be impressed.
But the facts are they actually did pick up all their trash.
I simply cannot explain that away.
They are just lucky they didn't pick up one of the pipe bombs kamala left for them.
Granted they were not live and assembled to where they would go off but can you imagine how bad that would have been if it was someone competent and skilled to do it?
That could have hurt someone. Can you imagine how that conversation went down at the pre-planning meeting?

Pelosi: who is going to place the pipe bombs.
Kamala: oh let me, I will do it.
It is really close to my living accommodations.

Pelosi: Uh, no. What if you did something stupid like actually arming them?

Kamala: I promise I will not do anything to them.
Let me, let me do it please.
I really want to wear my hoodie and face mask and all that spy looking stuff.
Imagine how it would look on camera.
I get to act like a man who is a woman who walks like a man.
They will never figure that out.
Let me, let me

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: WeMustCare

Ah, so Johnson is protecting the identity of the FBI agents who (allegedly) incited the riot in the first place. I see.

Possibly! I'm banned from Truth Social for awhile, so I don't know what the MAGA-world is thinking.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

A million people picked up their trash? They missed some things. I didn't include the photos of feces smeared on the walls, blood on statues, all the glass from the broken windows, broken doors, etc.

a reply to: WeMustCare

I'm banned from Truth Social for awhile

What?! Oh no! That's awful, Care! I'm really sorry to hear that.
DId you deserve it?