Israel to Flood Hamas Tunnels with Seawater

This is good news to all that have been very critical of Israel’s attacks.

Israel has assembled a system of large pumps it could use to flood Hamas’s vast network of tunnels under the Gaza Strip with seawater, a tactic that could destroy the tunnels and drive the fighters from their underground refuge but also threaten Gaza’s water supply, U.S. officials said.

Flooding

Oh. Neat.

Is this before or after the hostages are released/rescued?

a reply to: Xtrozero
First, I can't access the full article unless I sign up and pay the WSJ.... not happening.
Second, your title is a little missleading, the WSJ headline is...

Israel Weighs Plan to Flood Gaza Tunnels With Seawater

NOT that they are going to as per your thread title.
Finally, a question, why would this be

good news to all that have been very critical of Israel’s attacks.

?
Thank you
Rainbows
Jane

originally posted by: SteamyAmerican
Oh. Neat.

Is this before or after the hostages are released/rescued?

Are any still alive?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: SteamyAmerican
Oh. Neat.

Is this before or after the hostages are released/rescued?

Are any still alive?

Hard to say.

Kinda like “if a tree falls in the woods”.

But this time it’s “when Israel uses the Hadrian Doctrine….”

originally posted by: SteamyAmerican

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: SteamyAmerican
Oh. Neat.

Is this before or after the hostages are released/rescued?

Are any still alive?

Hard to say.

Kinda like “if a tree falls in the woods”.

But this time it’s “when Israel uses the Hadrian Doctrine….”

No, I mean, have the palestinians raped and killed them all.

a reply to: Xtrozero

So it would likely destroy gazas water supply too. Not genocide though.

originally posted by: Maybenexttime
a reply to: Xtrozero

So it would likely destroy gazas water supply too. Not genocide though.

If they surrender, then no damage.

Kinda easy-peasy.

Do rats swim?

originally posted by: Maybenexttime
So it would likely destroy gazas water supply too. Not genocide though.

The 'Palestinians" chose to put Hamas in charge.
The 'Palestinians' overwhelmingly support Hamas.
If their water supply gets screwed up because Israel is defending itself,
then that is the fault of the Palestinians themselves.
They chose it Hamas, therefore they chose the consequences.

a reply to: montybd

Do rats swim?

sadly they can swim like fish.

Exterminate the vermins, they have been hiding on tunnels like rats and cockroaches.

They need to be flushed out, no civilian will be living in hamas Dugged out tunnel unless they are terrorist.

I bet they will say that women and children were killed in the tunnel flooding.

a reply to: DBCowboy

If their hostages were alive before being drowned by Israel, I don't think the medical examiners would report that.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Not for long underwater, though?

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: DBCowboy

If their hostages were alive before being drowned by Israel, I don't think the medical examiners would report that.

If any of the hostages were still alive, the palestinians would have used them to get more palestinian criminals free and to prolong the cease-fire.

The hostages were divided, the ones that were released were the ones held by hamas, is still more hostages that are held by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

They are not in the tunnels, only hamas hostages were.

More than 40 of the hostages taken from Israel into Gaza on October 7 are not currently held by Hamas, the group that launched the attack, a diplomatic source briefed on the negotiations told CNN Monday.

That creates a complication in potentially extending the length of truce, because the agreement calls for Hamas to hand over the hostages in exchange for Palestinian detainees held by Israel – so Hamas must have the hostages to hand over.

CNN has previously reported that an estimated 40 to 50 of the hostages were held by Palestinian Islamic Jihad or other groups or individuals. That was before the handover of hostages began on Friday.

www.cnn.com...

I love getting real time play-by-plays that can and will be read and planned for accordingly by the opposing side.

This is why coaches cover their mouths while they talk during games and don't let announcers and reporters down there to question their next moves during games?

originally posted by: Maybenexttime
a reply to: Xtrozero

So it would likely destroy gazas water supply too. Not genocide though.

Ok, so no bombing and no flooding.

Ok, General Hamassy Pants, what should Israel do to get the murdering bastards?

People countering every Israeli move and then saying they don’t support Hamas are FOS.

originally posted by: NorthOS

originally posted by: Maybenexttime
a reply to: Xtrozero

So it would likely destroy gazas water supply too. Not genocide though.

Ok, so no bombing and no flooding.

Ok, General Hamassy Pants, what should Israel do to get the murdering bastards?

People countering every Israeli move and then saying they don’t support Hamas are FOS.

If Israel uses harsh language, the wrong pronouns, then all hamas will gather next to their comfort goats.

We load the comfort goats with C4.

originally posted by: angelchemuel
First, I can't access the full article unless I sign up and pay the WSJ.... not happening.

Well to bad then, but I'm not a member either.

Second, your title is a little missleading, the WSJ headline is...

Israel Weighs Plan to Flood Gaza Tunnels With Seawater

NOT that they are going to as per your thread title.

OK... They are literally putting in pumps as we talk about it.

Finally, a question, why would this be

good news to all that have been very critical of Israel’s attacks.

?

Well it beats blowing everything up starting from the top down, doesn't it? People are complaining that it is a war crime for Israel to attack the tunnels with civilians above in buildings, so they either flood them or use bunker busters, what do you think?