Mike Lindell Promises to 'Expose Everything' After Huge Ruling From Judge

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: Boomer1947

Risk limiting audits can be easily compromised, as we saw from the Maricopa County forensic audit results, and ultimately, Georgia decided against doing a full forensic audit sometime around the time Harrison Deal died in a fiery car crash.

Here's just some of the evidence that was discovered in Georgia:

WHAT WE FOUND IN GEORGIA
Six sworn affidavits of Fulton counterfeit ballots; (10s of thousands est.)
17,724 more votes than in person recount ballot images required to tabulate votes in Fulton
Drop box video surveillance representing 181,507 ballots destroyed in 102 counties
Improper Chain of Custody forms for 107,000 ballots statewide
Estimated Chain of Custody forms missing for 355,000 ballots statewide
(Georgia Star) 86,860 voters in 2020 have false registration date prior to 2017 but were not on 2017 history file
Over 1.7 million original ballot images are lost or destroyed in 70 counties despite state, federal law

1. The U.S. District Court found on Oct 11th, 2020 the Dominion Voting System that was used in the November 2020 election is unverifiable to the voter and in violation of two Georgia statues
2. There are six sworn affidavits of counterfeit mail-in ballots in Fulton Co. election results scaling into the tens of thousands
3. State Farm Arena video shows at least four violations of Georgia election law
4. Approximately 43,000 DeKalb Co. drop box ballots have no chain of custody forms to authenticate them
5. Tru-Vote Geo tracking showed evidence of ballot harvesting teams driving repeatedly to drop boxes in Fulton and DeKalb
6. All 350,000+ original in-person ballot images in Fulton are missing in violation of federal, state retention law
7. All 393,000+ original ballot images in Cobb are missing in violation of federal, state retention law
8. At least 17,720 certified in person recount votes have no ballot images in Fulton
9. 18,325 voters had vacant residential addresses according to U.S. Post Office
10. 904 voters were registered at a P.O. Box address, which is illegal
11. All or large parts of 2,000,000 original ballot images from 70+ Georgia counties are missing
12. Failure to make mandatory check of ballot envelope signature to signature on file resulted in a 2020 absentee bllot rejection rate drop from 3.47% (in 2018) to 0.34%, which translates to the acceptance and inclusion of approximately 4,400 dubious Fulton County mail-in ballots
13. The U.S. District Court found Secretary of State’s office “not credible” on August 16th, 2019 [pg. 70]
14. A report compiled by Matt Braynard and his team at Look Ahead America provided specific, verifiable evidence that likely illegal ballots exceed the margin of victory in the Presidential race
15. Statistical abnormalities identified in many GA counties by former Army Intelligence Captain, Seth Keschel, show that it is implausible that the election results are correct.

VoterGA.org

I would add the GBI investigation of the State Farm Arena incident as evidence of piss poor investigating at best, and possibly evidence of a cover-up.

Oh and last I heard, Georgia doesn't even plan on updating their vulnerable Dominion software to meet basic security compliance for the 2024 election.

Georgia is one of the last States that should be used as an example of election integrity, as they have become one of the worst.

This post stopped everyone from wanting proof of mass voter election fraud

a reply to: IndieA

I find it highly coincidental that GBI (Georgia Bureau of Investigations) and GBI Strategies out of Tennessee that were instrumental in the Michigan election fraud cover up are so similar in name.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

All I'm saying is there is no evidence that supports your narrative and you have failed to provide any whenever asked.

Edit to refocus attention to details about election fraud.
Jinme and IndieA have begun to set the narrative straight

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

All I'm asking is for you to post any evidence that supports your fanciful claims. If it's as abundant as you claim it should be easy for you to provide evidence there's a "military investigation."

I think the '20 election was corrupt AF, and I can see Mike's frustration trying to expose this using what wealth and connections he's accumulated, but maybe he should tone it down or refocus?

All I know is I've never found a better pillow for me and how I sleep, it's like its getting better the more I sleep on it. I've gone through a ton of pillows and they are either short-lived, or crunchy, or hot and sweaty, or smell bizarre, or make my skin freak out. Toss some high thread counts on it and I'm sleeping well. With today's nasty azz politics, that's something.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

All I'm asking is for you to post any evidence that supports your fanciful claims. If it's as abundant as you claim it should be easy for you to provide evidence there's a "military investigation."

Fair enough

thedocuments.info...

Trump and the military put together a 7 year plan to counter the deepstate 16 year plan
rumble.com...

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

The ramblings of someone that doesn't understand the documents he's citing and then makes crazy jumps in logic is not evidence.

How about this, provide the document you believe is the strongest evidence that there's a "military investigation."

a reply to: Threadbarer

" Earlier this month, District Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama appointee, issued a ruling that granted a bench trial for a long-running lawsuit seeking to rid Georgia of its electronic voting machines in favor of hand-marked paper ballots. "


In 50 Words or Less , Please tell me Why this is Not a Good Thing in your Opinion.......

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

The ramblings of someone that doesn't understand the documents he's citing and then makes crazy jumps in logic is not evidence.

How about this, provide the document you believe is the strongest evidence that there's a "military investigation."

How about you do it.
You are only trolling.
You have no intent in grasping any details.
You are looking for arguments and wasting people's time.
I provided the source for the documents you asked for.
A trove of them mostly being legal.
All the receipts you asked for are right there.
Why do you think you are credible?
I have asked that from you and I have no documents showing me why yet from you.
All I get from you are the ramblings of someone that doesn't understand the documents provided them and all you do is .are jumps in logic hoping others will do the work for them.

What makes you credible and not just a troll?
You do not seem to be able to grasp the concepts presented to you.
Go through the documents and pick out what you want to address

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

I have no opinion one way or another. I'm not a resident of Georgia.

I still fail to see what it has to do with a military investigation into the 2020 election led by Trump because he's actually still the Commander in Chief like another user is trying to claim.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

How can I provide documents for a military investigation that doesn't exist?

Earlier in this thread I asked you what you think EO13848 actually does and you were completely wrong. I asked you to point out what part of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 dissolves the country and grants ownership back to England. You didn't respond.

Have you actually read any of the primary sources this nutcase cites or do you simply take him at his word?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

How can I provide documents for a military investigation that doesn't exist?

Earlier in this thread I asked you what you think EO13848 actually does and you were completely wrong. I asked you to point out what part of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 dissolves the country and grants ownership back to England. You didn't respond.

Have you actually read any of the primary sources this nutcase cites or do you simply take him at his word?

I answered and you do not seem to be able to grasp the information you cited.
So of course you think I am wrong.
What makes you credible whare you discount others that do the work?
Most of the things you are asking about you just learned about today.
And the first Google you find that appeals to you becomes something that you feel makes you an expert.
Your sources are garbage.
That's why you cannot understand anything.
But you expect me to jump through hoops even though you predetermined and presupposed you are right and I am wrong.
Do some work man.
I have nothing more to do with you.
You are too lazy

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

My sources are the primary documents, the laws and EOs, you keep citing. All I'm asking for you is to cite the sections that sort your narrative. If you're the expert you claim you are then it should be a simple feat to point me to a paragraph or section.

However, if you've never actually read these documents and are simply relying on another person's interpretation then we might see a scenario where people keep asking you to provide evidence and instead you keep telling people to read the scrawlings of a conspiracy theorist.

Many of these state-specific election cases are appealed up to the Supreme Court, where they get shot down by CORRUPT/COMPROMISED Chief Justice, John Roberts.

Attorney Lin Wood had a really ironclad case proving Georgia election fraud in 2020. But, like ALL THE OTHERS, the Supreme Court (JOHN ROBERTS) refused to hear it/them.

Source: www.law.com...

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

My sources are the primary documents, the laws and EOs, you keep citing. All I'm asking for you is to cite the sections that sort your narrative. If you're the expert you claim you are then it should be a simple feat to point me to a paragraph or section.

However, if you've never actually read these documents and are simply relying on another person's interpretation then we might see a scenario where people keep asking you to provide evidence and instead you keep telling people to read the scrawlings of a conspiracy theorist.

You did nothing of the sort.
And I simply gave you condensed info from verified sources that provides a concise synopsis.
You spend all your time in every thread you entire attempting to make others the topic.

Do some work man.
You are lazy

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

You're the one that seems to keep deflecting whenever someone asks you to prove your claims.

Just quote one line from any of those documents Johnson cites that you think is proof that Trump is controlling the military and they are investigating the 2020 election which will culminate in military tribunals in the next year.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

You're the one that seems to keep deflecting whenever someone asks you to prove your claims.

Just quote one line from any of those documents Johnson cites that you think is proof that Trump is controlling the military and they are investigating the 2020 election which will culminate in military tribunals in the next year.

Since it's a test I will quote one from memory.

Under a state of National emergency the national guard was activated and under presidents orders and control.
They have yet to return to the individual states and under the control of CIC.
They may have returned a few months back but I do not believe that is so.
Do you remember the National Guard stationed around the white house and Capitol with constantune wire fences on the capitol with it strung on the inside as if to keep people in as well as out?

Are they still serving abroad?
That would be still under CIC and only the acting CIC can end their service away from the States they were under after being activated for federal duty under state of emergency.
Biden does not have the authority to do so.
Prove me wrong and show me when Biden ended their service abroad.
Only CIC CAN.
Now do the work man, you lazy bum

Also, you lazy tart.
In regards to EO13848 show me, cite me your contentious claims and tell me why Biden extended it past the time it would have expired on its own.
You claim I am wrong but only gave your opinion but not what or why.
Do the work man

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

You say you quote it from memory, but what official document are you quoting?

In regards to EO13848, why wouldn't Biden renew an EO that sets a policy that routs out foreign influence on our elections and establishes a method to sanction the foreign entities that seek to influence our elections?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

You say you quote it from memory, but what official document are you quoting?

In regards to EO13848, why wouldn't Biden renew an EO that sets a policy that routs out foreign influence on our elections and establishes a method to sanction the foreign entities that seek to influence our elections?

Sanction?
Confiscate and impound all assets and freeze all bank accounts and absorb them into Treasury?
That's a sanction?
And it is from the Law of War Manual.
What the military would be governing themselves by under the Stafford Act and Continuation of Government during a National State of Emergency.

See, if you just do some of the work the discussion can move forward.
Good job man.

a reply to: Allaroundya4k

If you'd like to see what, I recommend that you watch the Moment Of Truth Summit that he hosted in August of 2022. Just go to Rumble and search 'Mike Lindell Moment Of Truth Summit'. The Right Side network covered it in its entirety. Representatives from every state sharing the particulars of that state's election system. I posted links to it in this thread, in a post just up the page from the one you replied to.