Jan 6th lies, and some data erased by Sham Committee

a reply to: chr0naut

Actually, if you take the time to read some of your posts, you find gems like this....

Adding to the sense of uncertainty, the General Services Administration held off on formally beginning the transition, preventing Biden’s teams from gaining access to federal agencies. An agency spokesperson said late Monday that an “ascertainment” on the winner of the election had not yet been made. Citing what the agency did during the extended 2000 electoral recount, it signaled that it may not do so until Trump concedes or the Electoral College meets next month.

Looks like the GSA, not Trump, did not start the transition process but the winner was not yet declared. Hmm.....

Also, you cannot have an insurrection against yourself. Trump was the sitting President on 1/6.

The vote to approve the electoral college was postponed a few hours. Nothing was stopped. It all moved forward.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: chr0naut

speaking of nothing burgers, here are two questions for you.

question 1:
What date was Joe Biden supposed to be sworn in as the 46th president?

20th January at 12:00 noon.

Question 2:
What date did Joe Biden ACTUALLY swear in and move into the white house?

20th January at 11:48 am.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: chr0naut

speaking of nothing burgers, here are two questions for you.

question 1:
What date was Joe Biden supposed to be sworn in as the 46th president?

20th January at 12:00 noon.

Question 2:
What date did Joe Biden ACTUALLY swear in and move into the white house?

20th January at 11:48 am.

that's odd. And you claimed Trump was going to lock himself in the oval office crapper and never come out. Sounds like you are full of what goes in the crapper.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: chr0naut

Actually, if you take the time to read some of your posts, you find gems like this....

Adding to the sense of uncertainty, the General Services Administration held off on formally beginning the transition, preventing Biden’s teams from gaining access to federal agencies. An agency spokesperson said late Monday that an “ascertainment” on the winner of the election had not yet been made. Citing what the agency did during the extended 2000 electoral recount, it signaled that it may not do so until Trump concedes or the Electoral College meets next month.

Looks like the GSA, not Trump, did not start the transition process but the winner was not yet declared. Hmm.....

Also, you cannot have an insurrection against yourself. Trump was the sitting President on 1/6.

The vote to approve the electoral college was postponed a few hours. Nothing was stopped. It all moved forward.

So, it's the GSA's fault that they couldn't move forward until Trump conceded, or the EC met again?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: chr0naut

speaking of nothing burgers, here are two questions for you.

question 1:
What date was Joe Biden supposed to be sworn in as the 46th president?

20th January at 12:00 noon.

Question 2:
What date did Joe Biden ACTUALLY swear in and move into the white house?

20th January at 11:48 am.

that's odd. And you claimed Trump was going to lock himself in the oval office crapper and never come out. Sounds like you are full of what goes in the crapper.

That isn't my claim, it was Trump's. Another thing that he said, but that he didn't follow through.

What a w(h)inner!

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
a reply to: chr0naut

Ted Cruz was speaking to convince the proceedings to follow an historical precedent to take a 10 day tiger team into looking into the accusations of election problems.

This 10 days could have gone a long way to clearing up the controversy and convincing the American public what went on.

As it was, the riot broke out, and nobody ever brought up the 10-day Congressional tiger team approach again, and anyone wanting to look into the problems was shouted down and labelled an 'election denier'.

So yes, team Donkey had a reason to start a false flag insurrection.

But they had no time to plan, organize, and get everyone on-board.

You consistently attribute incredible capability on the Democrats, and portray Team Turnip as bumbling and ineffectual, outwitted at every turn, and oh so persecuted.

The excuses are becoming quite weak and unfeasible.

Face it, neither side are capable. They screw up because they are screw-ups.

a reply to: chr0naut

When Trump tweeted out his 'come to DC, it will be wild' was a stupid stupid thing to do.

So stupid I wonder if he isn't in on the illusion, like professional wrestling. One grand kabuki dance.

Pelosi had plenty of time to make some calls.

a reply to: chr0naut

Just pointing out a independent government agency was stating that they should wait. They started the transition on November 27th but it was not Trump who stopped the transition which is what we always hear about.

a reply to: chr0naut


4 DAYS after the election these swing states were called for BIden.

Arizona
Wisconsin
Michigan
Pennsylvania
Nevada

Georgia was never even called.

4 days....and no one should be questioning it. I know i went to bed on November 3rd and knew I was going to wake up to a Trump second term.

The house took over almost 2 weeks to call for the Republicans...

Please. The DNC, or the Progressive Movement in the US has been led by the same people since the late 1800's and Woodrow's New Freedom sealed this countries fate over 100 years ago.

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
Ted Cruz was speaking to convince the proceedings to follow an historical precedent to take a 10 day tiger team into looking into the accusations of election problems.

Where does the Constitution state that the losers can take 10 days to investigate the elections run by the states?

The accusations of cheating were already looked into, over 60 court cases, with no evidence of cheating.

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
Ted Cruz was speaking to convince the proceedings to follow an historical precedent to take a 10 day tiger team into looking into the accusations of election problems.

Where does the Constitution state that the losers can take 10 days to investigate the elections run by the states?

The accusations of cheating were already looked into, over 60 court cases, with no evidence of cheating.

You must be pretty young not to remember Democrat Al Gore holding up the 2000 election for over a month.
And all the Democrat election deniers crying.

And you would have to be stupid not to see all the irregularities in the 2020 election.

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
Ted Cruz was speaking to convince the proceedings to follow an historical precedent to take a 10 day tiger team into looking into the accusations of election problems.

Where does the Constitution state that the losers can take 10 days to investigate the elections run by the states?

The accusations of cheating were already looked into, over 60 court cases, with no evidence of cheating.

The constitution doesn't say you can't lie a lot like you just did. Claim there's no evidence when everyone saw mountains of it on election night and the next days after. All it took was for millions of dollars to change hands, payoff the judges, News companies are already in their pockets, no need to bribe them, threaten some families, by any means necessary to keep the orange away.

People that parrot "there's no evidence" like zombies just don't look intelligent at all, and like whiny kids.

"Whaaa! You lost, there's no evidence!" LOL

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
Ted Cruz was speaking to convince the proceedings to follow an historical precedent to take a 10 day tiger team into looking into the accusations of election problems.

Where does the Constitution state that the losers can take 10 days to investigate the elections run by the states?

The accusations of cheating were already looked into, over 60 court cases, with no evidence of cheating.

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
Ted Cruz was speaking to convince the proceedings to follow an historical precedent to take a 10 day tiger team into looking into the accusations of election problems.

Where does the Constitution state that the losers can take 10 days to investigate the elections run by the states?

The accusations of cheating were already looked into, over 60 court cases, with no evidence of cheating.

Tell me you drank all the MSM kool aid without telling me you drank all the MSM kool aid....

a reply to: chr0naut

What will happen is those lawyers for the plaintiffs will tell the world if any exculpatory video evidence was kept from them and not turned over.
There will be a lot of eyes going over all the footage and timeliness.
And a lot of it from paid investigators for the plaintiffs lawyers.

It is plain and simple. Everyone who has been made a pawn to this bull shyte game between intelligence, Congress, intelligence etc. and locked away with zero due process needs to be immediately released, even those called "guilty of" something, handed a cheque for two million dollars, and let life go on. I can't even imagine the anger building up oin many of us watching our poor countrymen made into chess pieces for the entertainment of the rich and ruling classes...

Oh and more than anything, screw to hell and back every last judge in the United States at the appropriate level. Superior court judges I think?? As well as all of the Supreme courts of this country. It could not be more obvious that for any Trump accusations, for anything they can twist to make it LOOK like some illegal activity supported by trump, etc. they already have just the right judges picked out to preside over these cases when the sole way to make such cases legal and unbiased would be for some random lottery to choose the judge. Imagine if Republicans went after Democrats for all their BS...their transing children, their pushing to legalize pedophilia, their going after political opposition with the law, etc. and every last one of their cases were being heard by a republican judge who made all the comments on earth about how they will ruin X Y and Z SOMEHOW, you just watch! We would have the most embarrassing and loud nation of crybabies throwing tantrums in unison and it would never fly. But sure, people are presiding over our trials after spending years promising they don't know how, but they'll get him with something no matter what they gotta make up.

The fact that a fellow judge hasn't publicly called this out and filed whatever motion one must to suggest the trial workers are biased and already have kinds made up....to point out that Jan 6 tapes have already been selectively destroyed and without having ALL those tapes as evidence, you simply can no longer try anyone when selected scenes have been cut out and destroyed. Shame on ALL of them AND the Supreme Courts of applicable states and the US for being such charlatans and turning their backs on complete and utter unfair zero due process unconstitutional filthy rotten people working in the system, and not saying crap and allowing this fiasco to continue makes THEM JUST as filthy and rotten!

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
Ted Cruz was speaking to convince the proceedings to follow an historical precedent to take a 10 day tiger team into looking into the accusations of election problems.

Where does the Constitution state that the losers can take 10 days to investigate the elections run by the states?

The accusations of cheating were already looked into, over 60 court cases, with no evidence of cheating.

You must be pretty young not to remember Democrat Al Gore holding up the 2000 election for over a month.
And all the Democrat election deniers crying.

And you would have to be stupid not to see all the irregularities in the 2020 election.

Gore won the popular vote but Bush won the electoral college vote, and therefore the Presidency.

Gore contested the vote in Florida, due to the 'hanging chads' issue of the voting cards used in the now defunct 'voting machines'.

Gore finally conceded defeat to Bush on 13 Dec 2001, 35 days after election day (November 7, 2000) and 5 days after the 'December 8' statutory 'safe harbor' limitation date on legal challenges to the vote.

In comparison, Trump finally conceded defeat to Biden on 7 January 2021, 65 days after election day (November 3rd, 2020), and 30 days after the 'December 8' statutory 'safe harbor' limitation date on legal challenges to the vote.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
Ted Cruz was speaking to convince the proceedings to follow an historical precedent to take a 10 day tiger team into looking into the accusations of election problems.

Where does the Constitution state that the losers can take 10 days to investigate the elections run by the states?

The accusations of cheating were already looked into, over 60 court cases, with no evidence of cheating.

You must be pretty young not to remember Democrat Al Gore holding up the 2000 election for over a month.
And all the Democrat election deniers crying.

And you would have to be stupid not to see all the irregularities in the 2020 election.

Gore won the popular vote but Bush won the electoral college vote, and therefore the Presidency.

Gore contested the vote in Florida, due to the 'hanging chads' issue of the voting cards used in the now defunct 'voting machines'.

Gore finally conceded defeat to Bush on 13 Dec 2001, 35 days after election day (November 7, 2000) and 5 days after the 'December 8' statutory 'safe harbor' limitation date on legal challenges to the vote.

In comparison, Trump finally conceded defeat to Biden on 7 January 2021, 65 days after election day (November 3rd, 2020), and 30 days after the 'December 8' statutory 'safe harbor' limitation date on legal challenges to the vote.

Yeah? So what?

That would be equal application of the law!

What are you a monster!

a reply to: RazorV66