It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Because of its short lifetime, if methane emissions were cut today, atmospheric levels would drop off quickly. In a recent UN Environment Programme report on methane that Naik coauthored, researchers estimated that cutting methane emissions 45% today could reduce warming 0.28 ˚C by midcentury—keeping the world under the target of less than 1.5 ˚C of warming over preindustrial levels, as defined by the Paris agreement.
originally posted by: TheSkepticGuy23
a reply to: Annee
Same here, kind of. I have an older Ram 1500. It's only used to get lumber, straw/hay, and the occasional pallet of feed.
originally posted by: quintessentone
What's important now is to find solutions and not target activists who actually care about the Earth, saavy?
originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: quintessentone
Because I think the sun can absorb it. Its my opinion as I have nothing eslse to go on.
originally posted by: TheSkepticGuy23
originally posted by: quintessentone
What's important now is to find solutions and not target activists who actually care about the Earth, saavy?
I'm not certain the extremists you call activists are really concerned about more than virtue signaling.
Lots and lots of big coal pluming out of China, and gas in eastern Europe. What do we do about that? What can be done about that? Why aren't the activists focusing their efforts there?
originally posted by: quintessentone
China is not a democracy, remember that.
originally posted by: TheSkepticGuy23
originally posted by: quintessentone
China is not a democracy, remember that.
They have lots and lots of embassies in democracies. There were lots of protests at the embassies over the Uyghurs. I would think China's contribution to global emissions has an impact on a great many more people. Just sayin'
originally posted by: TheSkepticGuy23
Why aren't the activists focusing their efforts there?
originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: quintessentone
Personally I would still pursue that method as the sun is huge.
originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: quintessentone
Ok, and once again I a only going on my opinion. I could be way off.
originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: quintessentone
Thats why I mentioned rocket same into the sun. I read that decades ago but rockets were too costly. Could be different today.