Trump's star witness...Michael Cohen?

a reply to: frogs453

I cannot wait to see footage of him on the stand.

a reply to: Threadbarer

You are Trying to Defend the Honor of a Scumbag Lying Lawyer , that's Rich !

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

And you're trying to defend the honor of a scumbag, lying, ex-President.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Threadbarer

You are Trying to Defend the Honor of a Scumbag Lying Lawyer , that's Rich !

Be careful who you're loyal to.

I personally commend Cohen in how he's handled himself "after-the-fact".

He was young, ambitious, and stupid. But hardly the only person duped by Trump a conman.

I'd love to see Cohen get pardoned and his lawyer license reinstated.

Yes, exactly. So when asked the question, "did Trump ever tell you to inflate or deflate a property value"?

the answer, the only answer that matters was "no".

a reply to: network dude

Does that mean Trump did not direct somebody else to inflate any numbers? I do not think so.

Does that mean that Trump did not deliver the inflated numbers to Cohen to submit? I do not think it does.

Was Cohen even his accountant? nope......

a reply to: Annee

Young? He was 40 when he started working for Trump.

originally posted by: Annee
Haven't several people who were originally "under Trump's thumb" and his provided lawyers done the same thing?

I personally don't think what Cohen did is unusual.

And with accumulation of others saying the same thing, it presents a pattern.

Cohen admitted during testimony that the former president did not ask him to inflate his finances on a personal financial statement.

That is Cohen most recently as per the op Annee

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Annee

Young? He was 40 when he started working for Trump.

I'm 77.

Maybe youngish. He seemed youngish to me to be a fixer at that level.

I did say he was ambitious and stupid

originally posted by: SourGrapes

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: blindmellojello

Yeah such a classic answer to point out case law supports what I'm saying when confronted by someone speaking about something they know nothing about.

What's your level of knowledge? Are you a law clerk, paralegal, an attorney?

Yes, yes and yes.
All at the same time.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

And you're trying to defend the honor of a scumbag, lying, ex-President.

Still better than a scumbag, lying, current president.

a reply to: RazorV66

So then, you will not be voting for Trump next year?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: RazorV66

So then, you will not be voting for Trump next year?

Who’s the current president?

a reply to: RazorV66

Who would be the current President if Trump wins next year?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: RazorV66

Who would be the current President if Trump wins next year?

You can play all the word games you want.

The fact of the matter is that Trump is light years better than the current scumbag, lying president.

You know it and everyone knows it but your hurt feelz have deadened your minds.

a reply to: RazorV66

Remind me again what President has had the worst average GDP growth since WWII.

a reply to: Threadbarer

The one who's term was attacked by the Chinese Democrat's bi0weapon...

originally posted by: 777Vader
a reply to: Threadbarer

The one who's term was attacked by the Chinese Democrat's bi0weapon...

Fact.

But these low IQ clowns don’t know what facts are.

a reply to: RazorV66

Yes Fact , as in ..............

1. something that has actual existence
2. an actual occurrence
3. a piece of information presented as having objective reality
4. the quality of being actual : ACTUALITY
5. a thing done: such as
a CRIME , accessory after the fact


If a " Thing " can Meet that Criteria , then Ergo , it's a FACT Jack.................

and once the appeal is won, along with the presidency, things will take a drastic turn against the left. New people installed, this exact same law being used to shut down most democratic run businesses. (tell me you can't look into just about anyone and find something like this)

a reply to: network dude LOL... and when it isn't? the election was rigged again and the judge and jury are corrupt?

These new people installed, will they be the best and brightest like the last time? They were all corrupt yes? This time will be different?

And here you are advocating for shutting down democratic run business? So you want to weaponize the Gov't? Are you not against that? you guys are confusing.

If anybody thinks Donald Trump winning the presidential election will be good for America has s couple screws loose.