Sidney Powell pleads guilty

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

It is the law. Prosecutors have to prove mens rea. They couldn't do that. As a result the case was dropped.

The server in the bathroom provides all the criminal mind required.


The case was dropped because then AG Loretta Lynch left the decision up to Comey who then made his "no reasonable prosecutor" declaration.

Nice try.

a reply to: Another_Nut

In general, every crime is composed of three elements, the actual act (actus rea,) the intent (mens rea,) and causation. If prosecutors cannot show all three then a crime did not occur.

Comey said they could not show mens rea.

a reply to: JinMI

She believed no crime was being committed by having the email server.

nm

a reply to: Threadbarer

If prosecutors cannot show all three then a crime did not occur.

false. if a prosecutor cant prove all three then she wont charge for the crime, and comey didnt even say a prosecutor couldnt charge...just that

“our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

She believed no crime was being committed by having the email server.

Doesn't matter.

Ignorance of the law doesn't absolve you of breaking it.

Having the server installed in an unsecure location meets mens rea. When the classified information followed, it only cemented that assertion.

Can we get back on topic? Please: Sidney Powell pleads guilty

Hillary only came into this when poster stated we should respect Sidney because of her past history.

I said read Hillary's bio history -- it doesn't stop posters from ripping her apart.

originally posted by: Annee
Can we get back on topic? Please: Sidney Powell pleads guilty

Hillary only came into this when poster stated we should respect Sidney because of her past history.

I said read Hillary's bio history -- it doesn't stop posters from ripping her apart.

But it sure does show the pattern of a very biased law system

a reply to: Annee

heh.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


You should probably just worry about your own posts......


Anyway, the fact that HRC was not charged and that DJT is, and the extent of each, spells out very clearly to the American people who is above the law...and who is not.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

heh.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


You should probably just worry about your own posts......


Anyway, the fact that HRC was not charged and that DJT is, and the extent of each, spells out very clearly to the American people who is above the law...and who is not.

That is not what this thread is about.

Hillary has a very respectable bio history -- did that keep posters from trashing her?

Should it keep posters from trashing Sidney -- that she had a respectable past?

a reply to: Annee

Sidney, like Clinton, made their very public beds.

Folks are going to have opinions.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Sidney, like Clinton, made their very public beds.

Folks are going to have opinions.

Yes.

But Clinton does have a respectable bio history -- which never stopped anyone from trashing her.

So, its not gonna fly that Sidney gets a pass.

a reply to: Annee

Respectable? Clinton?

I guess that's one perspective.

Are you going into dementia or alzheimer's?

As you seem to be repeating yourself....

Or perhaps you've run out of useful conversation.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Respectable? Clinton?

I guess that's one perspective.

Are you going into dementia or alzheimer's?

As you seem to be repeating yourself....

Or perhaps you've run out of useful conversation.

Have you read her bio history?

a reply to: Annee

I've lived through most of it......

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

I've lived through most of it......

Both Sidney and Hillary have a respectable bio history.

Both did stupid later in life.

Neither gets a pass from being trashed by posters on ATS.

Done -- this does not need to be dragged out any more than it has.

a reply to: Annee

Then stop talking about it maybe?


Anyway, Powell got a pretty good deal. I'm curious to what she'll testify to should the time come.

Also, I'd like to see HRC put on trial as well. Get to the mens rea behind her actions combined with her history of being a truly despicable person not only in politics but in her private life as well.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Respectable? Clinton?

I guess that's one perspective.

Are you going into dementia or alzheimer's?

As you seem to be repeating yourself....

Or perhaps you've run out of useful conversation.

Have you read her bio history?

Hitler, Mao, Stalin aĺl had better bio history than Clinton but all them and her had similar objectives

originally posted by: FarmerSimulation

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Respectable? Clinton?

I guess that's one perspective.

Are you going into dementia or alzheimer's?

As you seem to be repeating yourself....

Or perhaps you've run out of useful conversation.

Have you read her bio history?

Hitler, Mao, Stalin aĺl had better bio history than Clinton but all them and her had similar objectives

Don't care.

I live in the present.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Annee is a fan.

Globalism and authoritarians are her political ideals.


Does bring up an interesting question though. I wonder how much damage the Clintons can do out of office vs in....