Biden interviewed for two days by prosecutor in classified documents probe

a reply to: JinMI

did he say i didn't take the documents "full stop" while reading the teleprompter?

I wonder how much sweets and treats and expensive meals Biden requisitioned for when the guy was there. They probably discussed the documents for twenty minutes, but had to make it appear a thorough investigation happened.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: HologramSimpleton432Hz




If you can't attribute a motive, how can you attribute murder and victims?

... Because there is a corpse? It doesn't have to be deliberate murder in this analogy, yet the dead bodies speak for themselves. Let's not get caught up in semantics and miss the forest for the trees.

a reply to: HologramSimpleton432Hz

Everything in law is semantics.


Missing the forest for the trees was essentially what I was offering to you based on your provided analogy.

I mean, we agree on the premise of "they" but only one of us went a step forward to provide some clarifying subjects.

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: HologramSimpleton432Hz

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: HologramSimpleton432Hz
a reply to: JinMI

It's cute that they think I'll believe this actually happened, and tragic that so many people can't see the theater for what it is.

Not directed at you of course.

OK then who is directing the theater, what are the motives and of course whats really happening behind the curtains...but hell if it was so easy for you to figure out, what are the next few scenes

I don't recall anybody knowing a strike from Hamas was imminent, or is this just domestic theater

I am not in the minds of the puppet masters, so I cannot provide you with the motive. It is a logical fallacy, however, to believe that because you can't fathom their motives that they must not be deceiving you. This is akin to standing at a murder scene, blood and victims everywhere, and stating that because you can't fathom the motive it must not have happened.

Where did I say, suggest, or infer that I can't fathom thier motives? It's all theater is a classic ATS trope FWIW. I always try and ask the same question to everyone when they say it's all theater

I wanted to hear your views you sound so sure once something happens yet no clue what's coming next. And

No, it's not "akin" to a murder scene at all, the evidence is clear, LOL if your theater theory was "akin" to said murder scene shouldn't the evidence be just as clear? It is not clear, we can speculate and make educated guesses and generalities aka they are going through the motions, stalling, and a little bit of the down low. Thats DC as usual.

Your obstinance is noted.

Also, it was inferred by none other than yourself that you cannot fathom their motives when you said "What are their motives?"

Is there anything else you would like me to tell you that you said?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: HologramSimpleton432Hz

Everything in law is semantics.


Missing the forest for the trees was essentially what I was offering to you based on your provided analogy.

I mean, we agree on the premise of "they" but only one of us went a step forward to provide some clarifying subjects.

Clarifying subjects based on the word of known liars is a lesson in futility. Look deeper than the superficial breadcrumbs fed to you by the machine.

a reply to: HologramSimpleton432Hz

I've a better idea.

Why don't you simply list "them?"

Then we can avoid all the semantics and barbs.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: HologramSimpleton432Hz

I've a better idea.

Why don't you simply list "them?"

Then we can avoid all the semantics and barbs.

I may have a new account but that doesn't mean that I haven't been an ardent follower of this website for many years. I believe we are approaching similar conclusions from different angles. I have respected your posts for years, and I myself grew up in the greater Seattle area, only recently having moved to Utah.

If you are asking for individual names, I'm afraid that I cannot supply you with much other than the traditionally bandied surnames. "They" are one with the shadows, as elusive as smoke inside an enclosed fist. Since the last major cataclysm they have emerged from the rubble with a near perfect plan, and we are seeing it come to fruition.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: putnam6

As with most things in gov't, timing is always evidence.


We'll see. At least someone got ahold of a record of it.

This was an inevitable bureaucratic early step in this process, it's how this goes.

Im completely open to the Illusion aspect, the misdirection, don't look behind the curtain angle, as you have said the record of what was said is the important part not the procedural issues in obtaining the record of the inquiry,

Was it biased window dressing? probably so, but damn thats DC's operational MO

a reply to: JinMI

I wonder how they kept biden from falling asleep, whispering and then screaming during the interview, darn I would have love listening to it.

Or perhaps they got a double to do the interview.

In a case like this, this interview will come at the end of the investigation. We may even have a report by the end of the year.

originally posted by: HologramSimpleton432Hz

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: HologramSimpleton432Hz

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: HologramSimpleton432Hz
a reply to: JinMI

It's cute that they think I'll believe this actually happened, and tragic that so many people can't see the theater for what it is.

Not directed at you of course.

OK then who is directing the theater, what are the motives and of course whats really happening behind the curtains...but hell if it was so easy for you to figure out, what are the next few scenes

I don't recall anybody knowing a strike from Hamas was imminent, or is this just domestic theater

I am not in the minds of the puppet masters, so I cannot provide you with the motive. It is a logical fallacy, however, to believe that because you can't fathom their motives that they must not be deceiving you. This is akin to standing at a murder scene, blood and victims everywhere, and stating that because you can't fathom the motive it must not have happened.

Where did I say, suggest, or infer that I can't fathom thier motives? It's all theater is a classic ATS trope FWIW. I always try and ask the same question to everyone when they say it's all theater

I wanted to hear your views you sound so sure once something happens yet no clue what's coming next. And

No, it's not "akin" to a murder scene at all, the evidence is clear, LOL if your theater theory was "akin" to said murder scene shouldn't the evidence be just as clear? It is not clear, we can speculate and make educated guesses and generalities aka they are going through the motions, stalling, and a little bit of the down low. Thats DC as usual.

Your obstinance is noted.

Also, it was inferred by none other than yourself that you cannot fathom their motives when you said "What are their motives?"

Is there anything else you would like me to tell you that you said?

Apologizes I thought you had something of substance behind the comment

Not gonna get drug into a back-and-forth suffice it to Im on a conspiracy site, since circa 2005 I think of dozens of political moves that are theater but in this instance, you were suggesting having Biden interview was theater. I don't think it is, it's just normal bureaucratic procedure adjusted for a decrepit ass President. The important part is we got hopefully what the decrepit ass President said on the record. No more no less, no directors or actors involved, no George Soros on the phone directing the interview must be done at the Whitehouse kind of clandestine BS for something so minor.

I did however think perhaps you have unique insight, thus prodding you to expand on your theory
but it seems you do not. Just the same old platitudes, "It's theater"

Simply it was an interview, how was it supposed to go down if it wasn't theater?

Sounds like you expected Biden to be strapped to a lie detector and the interview done live and on all the networks as he sits in a dark room with a bright light shined in his face.

originally posted by: HologramSimpleton432Hz

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: HologramSimpleton432Hz

I've a better idea.

Why don't you simply list "them?"

Then we can avoid all the semantics and barbs.

I may have a new account but that doesn't mean that I haven't been an ardent follower of this website for many years. I believe we are approaching similar conclusions from different angles. I have respected your posts for years, and I myself grew up in the greater Seattle area, only recently having moved to Utah.

If you are asking for individual names, I'm afraid that I cannot supply you with much other than the traditionally bandied surnames. "They" are one with the shadows, as elusive as smoke inside an enclosed fist. Since the last major cataclysm they have emerged from the rubble with a near perfect plan, and we are seeing it come to fruition.

originally posted by: Threadbare
In a case like this, this interview will come at the end of the investigation. We may even have a report by the end of the year.

Note Bidens demeanor this week.

a reply to: JinMI

Forgive my cynicism, but can you imagine spending 2 days interviewing a ventriloquist's dummy? 2 days means he went to the dementia ward of the old folks home (White House) and spent around 30 minutes with Joe each day getting their story straight. They might have had O' Bummer on speakerphone as well.

HUR gave Biden WEEKS to develop lies and alibis.

"The interview was scheduled weeks ago, and occurred Sunday and Monday."

Source: abc7chicago.com...

I'm sure HUNTER helped with concocting the lies and alibis. Joe had them written down and referred to them as Special Counsel HUR asked the questions.

I hope it was videotaped and we'll get to see it!

Code for they gave us the illusion that accountability was in play when in reality it all a con job! a reply to: JinMI

originally posted by: sirlancelot
Code for they gave us the illusion that accountability was in play when in reality it all a con job! a reply to: JinMI

Even absent of the current Israeli/Hamas conflict this looks like a red meat story.

They think we're beyond stupid.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: JinMI

Forgive my cynicism, but can you imagine spending 2 days interviewing a ventriloquist's dummy? 2 days means he went to the dementia ward of the old folks home (White House) and spent around 30 minutes with Joe each day getting their story straight. They might have had O' Bummer on speakerphone as well.

2 days.

I think that explains quite abit..

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: JinMI

Forgive my cynicism, but can you imagine spending 2 days interviewing a ventriloquist's dummy? 2 days means he went to the dementia ward of the old folks home (White House) and spent around 30 minutes with Joe each day getting their story straight. They might have had O' Bummer on speakerphone as well.

2 days.

I think that explains quite abit..

Clue me in Jin. What am I missing?