Donald Trump Followers Targeted by FBI as 2024 Election Nears

When they keep threatening civil war while sending death threats to judges, prosecutors, jurors, etc, what did they expect would happen?

originally posted by: Threadbare
When they keep threatening civil war while sending death threats to judges, prosecutors, jurors, etc, what did they expect would happen?

Like this you mean? www.washingtonpost.com...

a reply to: Threadbare

Wasn't this what the left and Democrats were saying when they said to the whole nations that

"Riots must continue and more riots will happen if "the rest" "allows" Trump to win election".

Weren't left and Democratic politicians as well as the media supporting the looting and "peaceful fires"?

Where was you outrage back then?

a reply to: TDDAgain

Do not forget the people that lost their lives trying to defend their minority business, democrats did not give a darn crap about who died during the riots in minority communities.

2 billion in damage and 25 people dead, meanwhile the BLM were all living the lives with all the donation that idiots send to them.

And now the useless weaponized FBI wants to harassed real patriots int he nation, because American can never be great again, hell not, no under democrats, they will not have any of it.

a reply to: JinMI

Operative definitional language has changed: from your link:

Right after January 6, the FBI co-authored a restricted report ("Domestic Violent Extremists Emboldened in Aftermath of Capitol Breach, Elevated Domestic Terrorism Threat of Violence Likely Amid Political Transitions and Beyond") in which it shifted the definition of AGAAVE ("anti-government, anti-authority violent extremism") from "furtherance of ideological agendas" to "furtherance of political and/or social agendas." For the first time, such groups could be so labeled because of their politics.

It was a subtle change, little noticed, but a gigantic departure for the Bureau. Trump and his army of supporters were acknowledged as a distinct category of domestic violent extremists, even as the FBI was saying publicly that political views were never part of its criteria to investigate or prevent domestic terrorism.

That's chilling!

Good. Associating with any other known terrorist would get the same response, why should this terrorist be any different?

a reply to: Degradation33

The conspiracies are religiously believed. They're being persecuted for the truth by a tyrannical government. It hits more religious than political notes.

So is it Saint Julian Assange now? As least where he is he ain't another on the Clinton body count yet.

With how the FBI handled the last election issues and burying things like the Hunter laptop, watching MAGA is is whee they are at on the political spectrum. Has been like that since Trump got elected and his ongoing impeachment dramas.

a reply to: JinMI

Follower, adherent, partisan refer to someone who demonstrates allegiance to a person, a doctrine, a cause, or the like. Follower often has an implication of personal relationship or of slavish acquiescence. Adherent, a more formal word, has implications of active championship of a person or a point of view.
www.dictionary.com...

Indeed.

Hmmm
Political affiliation now needs fbi approval?

Well done dems…..
Own it

originally posted by: Threadbare
When they keep threatening civil war while sending death threats to judges, prosecutors, jurors, etc, what did they expect would happen?

Oh, I see.


Speech is categorically worse than actions.


Even though, we've a right to speech, while they decline to enforce statutes.


Perfect then, right?

Sound logic.

a reply to: Degradation33

There are plenty of gun photos on the left. Who clearly aren't republicans. Pretty big gun culture in certain popular music, not usually associated with conservatives or rednecks.

Tons. Mostly held sideways all wrong tho'.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Threadbare
When they keep threatening civil war while sending death threats to judges, prosecutors, jurors, etc, what did they expect would happen?

Oh, I see.


Speech is categorically worse than actions.


Even though, we've a right to speech, while they decline to enforce statutes.


Perfect then, right?

Sound logic.

Speech is not a crime

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Degradation33

There are plenty of gun photos on the left. Who clearly aren't republicans. Pretty big gun culture in certain popular music, not usually associated with conservatives or rednecks.

Tons. Mostly held sideways all wrong tho'.

that's how it come out of the box yo.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Tell that to Abigail Jo Shry.

Texas Woman Charged With Threatening to Kill Judge in Trump Election Case

a reply to: network dude

Tooo funny....

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

Tell that to Abigail Jo Shry.

Texas Woman Charged With Threatening to Kill Judge in Trump Election Case

Got any links that aren’t paywalled?
I will wait…..

a reply to: shooterbrody

Charging Document

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

Charging Document

So, pretty much an empty threat from a pissed off blowhard...

Stupid? Very. Especially doing it from your own cell phone.

Is she dangerous? That is laughable.

Shouldn't be too hard. Just look for the frothed-up whiners on social media. You know...the ones can simply cannot STFU about politics, JB, DJT. BHO, HRC. NP and guns

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: shooterbrody

Charging Document

Oh
This part of the government scam that just got an injunction SHUTTING DOWN THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROGRAM?
www.foxnews.com...

A federal court ordered an injunction on a top agency within the Department of Homeland Security after finding that it likely violated the First Amendment by coordinating with social media companies to effectively censor "election-related speech."

On Tuesday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals extended the scope of an injunction in place that limits the Biden administration's communication with big tech companies to include the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) within the Department of Homeland Security. According to GOP Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, who is leading the litigation against the Biden administration, CISA is the "nerve center" of the White House's "vast censorship enterprise" and "the very entity that worked with the FBI to silence the Hunter Biden laptop story." "CISA was created to protect Americans from foreign attack, and now it has begun targeting its own citizens," Bailey told Fox News Digital.

Speech is constitutionally protected from exactly these jackasses.