It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: VulcanWerks
We used to lament the loss of hero's, great leaders, innovators, great minds and artists.
She was a politician.
Not to mention she was one of two senators representing the most populace state and 7th largest economy in the world. Absent for months on end. She was part of a committee that couldn’t move on issues in her absence.
Condolences to her family, but it’s hard for me to have potty for her when her last acts were defiance to so many Americans. Putting her “legacy” and perceived entitlement above their needs.
originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: AgarthaSeed
And it looks like she had a nice worth because of it. Guess it was her objectivism (Ayn Rand kind) that dealt with China.
Many make money off China.
Trump made a lot of extra profit choosing chinese steal over American made for his construction projects. A drop in the pail is the 4.5 million China has paid Him directly since becoming president (according to Forbes).
China PAYS EVERYONE.
EVERYONE takes china's money.
But if you want to say the late Senator helped normalize the "blind eye for China money" thing, that is absolutely fair.
originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: VulcanWerks
She presided over the California that went from Republican to Democrat. From Nixon through Bush Sr. California was a red state. It all changed the year she was elected to the Senate, 1992. And never went back.
She was at the forefront of shaping the democrat party into the one it is today. She will leave a legacy of spearheading several environmental regulations and gun control laws.