The Impeachment Inquiry of U.S. President Joseph R. Biden - Charges and Developments.

a reply to: dragonridr

It's been explained many times. James and Hunter founded investment firms that focused on investing in companies that were looking to break into Western markets. When those companies turned a profit, their firms would get a return on investment.

a reply to: Threadbarer


Did he get 2 billion or did someone invest 2 billion in an equity firm? Pretty sure there were no offshore accounts either. There is a big difference.

Jared was buying billion dollar properties before he knew Ivanka. You know his dad and yes I know who pardoned him.

I do not see the comparison. Kushner did not need Trump. Hunter has always needed the Big Guy.

originally posted by: peter_kandra

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Vermilion

And yet with all of this supposed "evidence", Comer has no evidence of any high crimes to take it to an impeachment vote against Joe Biden. 15 months later, and according to Comer, not likely any time in the near future. You enjoy him riling you up for nothing?

Do you actually think their performance art will change any votes? Even Fox jumped ship at the repetitive hearings with nothing new or any actual evidence to impeach.

While I may somewhat agree with you about not having any direct evidence, why was the laptop suppressed so hard during the 2020 election? Polls afterwards indicate that it would absolutely swayed enough people to change the outcome. It's really hard to win when you're playing against a stacked deck.

A laptop drive of unknown providence, which according to Lev was apparently obtained by the FSB and then ended up in Rudy's hands, full of pics of drugs and hookers of the adult son of the candidate really would have made a difference? The committee has access to the same info and there is no crime found. So why should it have hurt Biden if info was released?

If the fact that the other candidates sons stole money from charity and the candidate himself stated vile things about women, made sexual comments about his daughter, cheated on all wives, including a pregnant one with a hooker and is considered the "savior" of the nation, some drugs and hookers of a drug addicted relative of another candidate shouldn't mean much, you think?

a reply to: frogs453

10% for the big guy.

That’s kind of a big deal. If you’re honest.

a reply to: Vermilion

Yet if you've paid attention, there is no proof that any deal was done that gave 10% to Dad. If they had it, they would move forward instead of continuing the same old re-hashed stuff, while other claims crumble down among them.

a reply to: frogs453

You’re trying to say the laptop wasn’t hunters nor would it have made a difference.
You’re wrong. If you’re honest.
10% for the big guy.
Can’t deny it.

a reply to: Vermilion

It's very easy to deny. Where's the paper trail showing payments made to Joe?

a reply to: Vermilion

I never said it wasn't Hunter's drive. I stated how it miraculously ended up in Rudy's hands, similar to the fake 1023, again from Rudy, it causes normal people to pause. I said as there is no criminal activity found,so besides embarrassment, what purpose does this serve?

a reply to: Threadbarer

Mr Raskin is that you? All it proves is that they are very good at hiding money. Cash. Maybe they are like Fani and her man.

Again, if you think that Joe Biden, who was a Senator and VP for almost 40 years was never used to help is brother or both sons you are in denial. Now. The 200k check is the one most referred to. The one for a loan repayment. OK.

There are other investigations into Hunter as well as Joes brother found things. The Biden Business.

Link

Chairman Comer recently revealed how Joe Biden received $40,000 in laundered money from the account of his brother, James Biden, and his sister-in-law, Sara Biden, in the form of a personal check. The money that landed in Joe Biden’s bank account was funded by a complex web of financial transactions that began with the initial $5 million funding from Northern International Capital Holdings. On August 8, 2017, Northern International Capital sent $5 million to Hudson West III. That same day, Hudson West III sent $400,000 to Owasco, P.C. On August 14, 2017, Hunter Biden wired $150,000 to Lion Hall Group, LLC, a company owned by President Biden’s brother James and sister-in-law Sara Biden. On August 28, 2017, Sara Biden withdrew $50,000 in cash from Lion Hall Group and then deposited the money into her and James Biden’s personal checking account on the same day. On September 3, 2017, Sara Biden cut a check to Joe Biden for $40,000 for a “loan repayment.”

Joe loans a lot of money to people who are very very wealthy. That does not seem odd to you?

Oversight document

This email means nothing also....right?

Email

I mean, this is not influence peddling either right?

Link

Joe Biden’s brother told executives at a healthcare firm that the former vice president’s cancer initiative would promote their business, according to a participant in the conversation, who said the promise came as part of a pitch on behalf of potential investors in the firm. The allegation is the latest of many times Biden’s relatives have invoked the former vice president and his political clout to further their private business dealings. It is the first that involves the Biden Cancer Initiative, a project Joe Biden made the centerpiece of his post-White House life following the death of his son Beau.

They are criminals.

a reply to: matafuchs

You have loan repayments from his brother and his son. They total about $50,000 and we're made after Joe was out of office.

Last time I checked that's not even 10% of a million, let alone multi-millions. It's also not prolonged payments over the course of his political career.

So, once again, where's the crime?

a reply to: matafuchs

Did you miss "former President" and "post WH"? Not like he he took in 7.8M from foreign entities while President.

We should definitely not elect Trump again then with his partnership with Saudi Arabia, right? I mean being a former President and all. Perhaps we should dig into some emails there right?

It's certainly not like some unannounced until later back door nuclear deals with SA and the Prince telling others that he recieved classified info and then 2 billion invested into his son in laws business after office

a reply to: matafuchs

a project Joe Biden made the centerpiece of his post-White House life following the death of his son Beau.

James, Hunter, etc can pitch whatever they want to their clients. If they want to name drop Joe, there's no law that says they can't.

It only becomes a crime once it can be shown that Joe is dictating government policy in a way that is intentionally done to enrichen him and his family.

Where's that policy? Where's those payments?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

I never said Joe wasn't a politician. I don't see anything in those 16 year old articles that are inconsistent with what every other politician does.

I commend you on being honest. Yes, likely all of them, or at least a lot of them do it. Just as in Hollywood, many do a little coke every now and then, or when that hot girl passes out at the party, and a few boys have some fun with her, yea it happened, but it was still wrong.

And currently, the guy who is president is being looked at for it. It's looking like that was his grift, and he was good at it. Had the whole family in on it. Again, this doesn't have to be a crime for what is being said. Joe just lies about it a lot, and folks like you cover for him, even when, as you seem to admit, he's is doing it, or at least did it in the past.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: matafuchs

a project Joe Biden made the centerpiece of his post-White House life following the death of his son Beau.

James, Hunter, etc can pitch whatever they want to their clients. If they want to name drop Joe, there's no law that says they can't.

It only becomes a crime once it can be shown that Joe is dictating government policy in a way that is intentionally done to enrichen him and his family.

Where's that policy? Where's those payments?

who benefits from a push to EV's in a time when the infrastructure is not ready, nor the EV's themselves ready for winter in the northland? CHINA? And who was paying Hunter millions? CHINA. That's not proof of anything, but it's a direction to look. And being totally honest, nobody will find the smoking gun proof before Joe dies, so it's pointless, other than to remove Joe from office via election and bring in someone who isn't compromised.

a reply to: network dude

Well one of the Dem congress people stated they definitely hope to work with the GOP to establish some boundaries around influence peddling as it happens even at their level. Maybe they will do something about hundreds of thousands worth of gifts to SCOTUS judges by people who have interests in certain rulings as well. We can hope.

But again in this situation, they cannot find any laws broken.

a reply to: network dude

I can tell you that working in the US corporate automotive world, it's not just China pushing it. Behind the scenes they are also pushing for the infrastructure, the battery recycling, etc too.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: dragonridr

It's been explained many times. James and Hunter founded investment firms that focused on investing in companies that were looking to break into Western markets. When those companies turned a profit, their firms would get a return on investment.

There is a deeper paper trail then you appear to be aware of.

oversight.house.gov...

a reply to: dragonridr

A few payments to Joe totaling $50,000 made when Joe was out of office. The committee also has financial documents showing that Joe did transfer money to Hunter and James for the same amount that was paid back.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Just a few payments just like a few documents right?