It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Official Rosswell crash retrieval report from 1947

page: 2
11
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 21 2023 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: 1947boomer
It WAS a National Laboratory that was inside a military base .
The reason ?
As it was a highly classified base, just like many others,and the labs are situated inside a military base for security reasons.
Thus making you post irrelevant .



posted on Sep, 21 2023 @ 09:58 PM
link   
a reply to: 1947boomer

that's british classification not the U.S.'s. and it was also a intelligence gathering project headquartered at Bletchley Park/

besides i don't think that U.S intelligence documents would be using british intelligence classifications for internal inner agency reports. now if being shared with other nations, i could see they might add the classification with the U.S. classification, but not strike out the U.S.'s.


edit on 21-9-2023 by BernnieJGato because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2023 @ 04:52 AM
link   
Why is all this stuff getting rebunked again?

The MJ-12, Magik, Majestic... and whatever else you want to call them have been thoroughly debunked. Decades ago.

Firstly, there was a very real "Majestic" project created in 1951 as part of Emergency War Plans



The US Government would not use the same or similar name for another project to avoid confusion and more importantly for national security reasons.

FBI inquiries into whether there was a leak of classified information led them to the Air Force Office of Special Investigation. With AFOSI telling them the documents were hoaxes. Even though the AIr Force never provided any explanation as to how they arrived at this conclusion.

More spurious "Majestic" documents surfaced in the 1990s and even into the 2000s.

However, Jacques Vallee provides an interesting insight in his recent book Forbidden Science 5. Even naming the culprit of the hoax.



We also went over the definitive story of MJ-12: The whole charade started with Admiral Edward Burkhalter, then Chief of Naval Intelligence. His counter-intel staff doctored up authentic documents that referred to a project, indeed active (but classified) back in the fifties, to mislead the Soviets about technology developments, as Eric had already found out through his own contacts.

The doctored documents were leaked (reportedly through Rick Doty and his colleagues?) and dropped into the mailbox of an innocent ufologist who turned it into a major story, still a major source of bewilderment among the believers who treat it like gospel.



There's a lot more but I shall leave it there.



posted on Sep, 22 2023 @ 05:45 AM
link   
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

The part that triggered the Lost in Space robot to start shouting "Warning!" was using the word "interplanetary." It just seems to me that having an established group already and having it named that descriptive is not something the military would do, especially just after WW2.



posted on Sep, 22 2023 @ 07:45 AM
link   
a reply to: 1947boomer

Thank you, I did not know that. I worked there in the early 80s. Weird they called it a 'base'. Misnomer I guess.

My opinion of this document, however, remains the same.



posted on Sep, 22 2023 @ 07:48 AM
link   
a reply to: billxam

That was odd too.



posted on Sep, 22 2023 @ 07:58 AM
link   
Where did RedPanda, go?

Very little info in the OP. I got a warning on my very first thread for that from the mods.

Why haven't they come back to answer questions or defend criticism?



posted on Sep, 23 2023 @ 10:48 PM
link   
There's a lot of conflicting stuff in the OP from other proven sources with some truth mixed in. There WAS a survivor from the crash and it stayed at the YY-2 facility at Los Alamos until it died in 1952. They did bring the UFO to Los Alamos as well but they didn't store it there, most likely at Ft. Hachua (hope I spelled that correctly), so I know that part is correct. Little things like that so it's hard to say for sure if these are just a hoax or a different view point from another "covert team" inside a government entity.




top topics



 
11
<< 1   >>

log in

join