YouTube demonetizes Russell Brand citing his harmful ‘off-platform behavior'

... a legal breakdown..... of the mess




Basically hung, drawn and quartered without a fair trial........

Another woman has come forward that Brand exposed himself to her, she then informed management, but she nor her employer any took steps beyond that. Something needs to change.

A woman on Thursday accused British comedian, actor and social influencer Russell Brand of exposing himself to her in 2008, the latest in a series of accusations against him. The woman told CBS News partner network BBC News she was working in the same building where the BBC's Los Angeles office was when the incident occurred and that Brand went on to laugh about it moments later on his radio show.

The BBC story about the incident says it "raises serious questions for the BBC about how that part of the show, which was pre-recorded, was allowed to be broadcast days later."

"The woman never made a formal complaint," the BBC reported, adding that, "BBC management was informed about the incident in 2019, but no formal action was taken."

The woman told the BBC, "I feel ashamed, but more so, I wonder had something been done, perhaps there would have been fewer women he would have done horrible things to, which we're reading about in the papers now."

www.cbsnews.com...

a reply to: quintessentone

The BBC certainly comes out of this badly.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

The BBC certainly comes out of this badly.

Absolutely, and his other management company that looked the other way when he had that 16 yr. old school girl hanging around his workplace, enough so that management had to orchestrate a lie that she was his niece.

a reply to: quintessentone

Agreed.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Agreed.

If he was doing nothing wrong why the need to create that lie?

a reply to: quintessentone

Not sure he was "doing nothing wrong"?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Not sure he was "doing nothing wrong"?

I mean, really, after he exposed himself to her he actually admitted it on his show and laughed about it, and BBC thought that was okay - mind boggling.

a reply to: quintessentone

Yes, agreed?

a reply to: Saloon

You do realise that Brand is the very epitome of the Champagne Socialists that dominated UK public life in the Tony Bliar era don't you?

I agree that the government should not be forcing Rumble or anyone to demonetise or censor Brand.....but perhaps these platforms should feel morally obliged to whilst these allegations get investigated.
But at the end of the day it should be their choice.

As for 'speaking the truth'?
Well the jury's definitely out on that.

The man was an attention seeking media whore.
Rightly or wrongly the chickens have come home to roost, we reap what we sow.

a reply to: Freeborn

He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.

Not literally, of course.

Still wondering, with his apparent £16,000,000 net worth, why hasn't he gone legal?

a reply to: Freeborn

Champagne? More like crack, smack and the rest?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Freeborn

He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.

Not literally, of course.

Still wondering, with his apparent £16,000,000 net worth, why hasn't he gone legal?

Why hasn't he indeed.

a reply to: quintessentone

Who knows?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

Who knows?

Since most rape cases have no witnesses and the complainant always loses, perhaps he'll make his legal move after they are unable prove his guilt due to lack of witnesses ? Isn't that the way it works?

a reply to: quintessentone

I was thinking more like defamation or super injunction?

a reply to: Freeborn

You do realise that Brand is the very epitome of the Champagne Socialists that dominated UK public life in the Tony Bliar era don't you?

Tony Blair era, no I didn't know that. There's likely a lifetimes worth IDK
about Brands past. Nor do I see how it matters.

TextI agree that the government should not be forcing Rumble or anyone to demonetise or censor Brand.....but perhaps these platforms should feel morally obliged to whilst these allegations get investigated.
But at the end of the day it should be their choice.

How do the allogations get investigated anymore than they have been?
And why would they need to. They already got what they wanted.
He's silenced and it was so easy for them to do it. And the left is just fine with
that cause they're a cowardly pack of suck ups. And there isn't any jury either.

rumble.com...

The verdict is in and who ever wants to stay blue pilled to the end I
don't care. But don't be passing your kool aid my way I got people
I care about so I choose to see.

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: Freeborn

You do realise that Brand is the very epitome of the Champagne Socialists that dominated UK public life in the Tony Bliar era don't you?

Tony Blair era, no I didn't know that. There's likely a lifetimes worth IDK
about Brands past. Nor do I see how it matters.

TextI agree that the government should not be forcing Rumble or anyone to demonetise or censor Brand.....but perhaps these platforms should feel morally obliged to whilst these allegations get investigated.
But at the end of the day it should be their choice.

How do the allogations get investigated anymore than they have been?
And why would they need to. They already got what they wanted.
He's silenced and it was so easy for them to do it. And the left is just fine with
that cause they're a cowardly pack of suck ups. And there isn't any jury either.

rumble.com...

The verdict is in and who ever wants to stay blue pilled to the end I
don't care. But don't be passing your kool aid my way I got people
I care about so I choose to see.

The sheer amount of you people defending him is insane. Even after the story about basically grooming the 16yr old girl he openly referred to as “the child”.

All while addicted to heroin and crack.

You people are sick and disgusting. Women need protection because of people like you.

a reply to: fencesitter85

The hate coming off your post feels like a heat wave.

You think he has a lot of support here? You should check out his comments section.
MASSIVE! Some people just don't get it. lol

You people are sick and disgusting. Women need protection because of people like you.

Oh so Brand is guilty?

And you don;t believe in smear jobs right?

Most of the people against Brand and his supporters are likely
jealous or they're afraid that what he saying is true. This is an
obvious attack on an innocent man.

Never before have I witnessed such an obvious mass media assassination
attempt of an individual as this. This is just so mind blowingly obvious it’s
a highly targeted operation to try and take out a “threat”
Still no charges filed. Good luck with the lynching savages.

originally posted by: Saloon
a reply to: fencesitter85

The hate coming off your post feels like a heat wave.

You think he has a lot of support here? You should check out his comments section.
MASSIVE! Some people just don't get it. lol

You people are sick and disgusting. Women need protection because of people like you.

Oh so Brand is guilty?

And you don;t believe in smear jobs right?

Most of the people against Brand and his supporters are likely
jealous or they're afraid that what he saying is true. This is an
obvious attack on an innocent man.

Never before have I witnessed such an obvious mass media assassination
attempt of an individual as this. This is just so mind blowingly obvious it’s
a highly targeted operation to try and take out a “threat”
Still no charges filed. Good luck with the lynching savages.

See above. All believing a drug addict who groomed a barely-legal virgin, instead of multiple women. Disgusting.