Russell Brand denies 'serious criminal allegations' he claims are being made against him

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

"It's investigative journalism and I seriously doubt that they did not take extensive legal advice before going public."

Now you're referring to the latest allegations, I was referring to that specific case in 2014.

"Did they present any evidence!

By your logic you should be condemning them, too."

Spitting Image was satire, as you well know, hardly the same as investigative journalism.

"I haven't commented on that. I'm sure that Bastion is capable of speaking for himself?"

No but you jumped in to comment on my reply to Bastion, yet you say he is capable of speaking for himself. Hmm you're a slippery old fish aren't you?

a reply to: Kurokage

BUhahahaha! Why the hell would I apologize for a straight out lie?

The judge – who will soon become the first female Lord Chief Justice – concluded Ms Berki’s allegations appeared inconsistent and the couple were likely to prove her claims against them were false.

I'm sure your posting on this matter represents nothing but absolute btas as
part of an online lynch mob.

No charges filed and there won't be any so face the facts and
stop dancing in the dark. Or soon your little world will be falling
apart.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Slander? Defamation. Depends if it is untrue and there are various defences to defamation claims.

So far, Brand has not brought or intimated any such claim.

He might do yet, but

As I have said, many times, let's see if he even gets charged?

It's all speculation.

He will be taking advice from his lawyers while they look in into it , so like you said, let's see, it's all speculation.

a reply to: surfer_soul

Well, yes. Agreed?

After 3 Mod Notes...thread closed for review.